Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2024] ZACT 26

Bidshelf 93 Proprietary Limited (to be renamed Bidvest Automotive Holdings Proprietary Limited) v DEKRA Automotive Proprietary Limited (LM105Oct23)

Bidshelf 93 Proprietary Limited (to be renamed Bidvest Automotive Holdings Proprietary Limited) v DEKRA Automotive Proprietary Limited (LM105Oct23) [2024] ZACT 26 (18 July 2024)

The Tribunal conditionally approved Bidvest Auto's acquisition of DEKRA, addressing vertical foreclosure risks through procurement and information-barrier conditions.

  • Vertical Merger Assessment
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Hdp Ownership
  • Information Barriers
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2024] ZACT 3

Astron Energy (Pty) Limited v Vitol Emerald Bidco (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM196Mar23/INT123Nov23; LM196Mar23CNF135Nov23)

Astron Energy (Pty) Limited v Vitol Emerald Bidco (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM196Mar23/INT123Nov23; LM196Mar23CNF135Nov23) [2024] ZACT 3 (15 January 2024)

The Competition Tribunal granted Astron Energy leave to intervene in the Engen/Vitol merger proceedings, limited to specified foreclosure, employment, and merger-condition issues.

  • Intervention Rights
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Confidentiality In Merger Proceedings
  • Employment Impact
  • Merger Conditions
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 40

Sanlam Emerging Markets Proprietary Limited and Another v SAN JV (RF) Proprietary Limited (LM100Aug22)

Sanlam Emerging Markets Proprietary Limited and Another v SAN JV (RF) Proprietary Limited (LM100Aug22) [2023] ZACT 40; [2023] 3 CPLR 44 (CT) (17 August 2023)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved Sanlam and Allianz’s joint acquisition of SAN JV, imposing restrictions on South African activities and information sharing.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Vertical And Horizontal Overlap
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Black Economic Empowerment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 67

SABIC Agri-Nutrients Company v ETG Inputs Holdco Limited (LM 150Nov22)

SABIC Agri-Nutrients Company v ETG Inputs Holdco Limited (LM 150Nov22) [2023] ZACT 67 (5 May 2023)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved SABIC Agri-Nutrients Company’s acquisition of a 49% stake in ETG Inputs Holdco Limited.

  • Vertical Merger
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest
  • Spread Of Ownership
  • Vertical-merger
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 20

Clicks Retailers v H Mallach and Associates (LM183Feb23)

Clicks Retailers v H Mallach and Associates (LM183Feb23) [2023] ZACT 20 (12 April 2023)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Clicks Retailers’ acquisition of M-Kem Pharmacy, finding no substantial lessening of competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest Employment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 35

TLG Investments (Pty) Ltd v Tradekor Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM171Jan23)

TLG Investments (Pty) Ltd v Tradekor Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM171Jan23) [2023] ZACT 35 (27 March 2023)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved TLG Investments’ acquisition of sole control of Tradekor, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Vertical Relationships
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest
  • Hdp Shareholding
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 34

SPAR Group Ltd v SPAR Encore Ltd (LM133Oct22)

SPAR Group Ltd v SPAR Encore Ltd (LM133Oct22) [2023] ZACT 34 (27 February 2023)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved Spar Group’s acquisition of full control of Spar Encore, finding no competition harm and imposing public interest procurement conditions.

  • Vertical Merger
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Hdp Ownership
  • B Bbbee Compliance
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 103

ZA Online Store Proprietary Limited v Shock Proof Investment 202 Proprietary Limited (LM066JUL22)

ZA Online Store Proprietary Limited v Shock Proof Investment 202 Proprietary Limited (LM066JUL22) [2022] ZACT 103 (29 September 2022)

Competition Tribunal approved ZA Online’s acquisition of an additional 0.2% in Shock Proof unconditionally, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest Assessment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 31

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Bollore Africa Logistics SAS (LM012APR22)

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Bollore Africa Logistics SAS (LM012APR22) [2022] ZACT 31 (25 July 2022)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved MSC Group’s acquisition of Bolloré Africa Logistics SAS, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 9

A.P Moller-Maersk A/S v Senator International (LM135Dec21)

A.P Moller-Maersk A/S v Senator International (LM135Dec21) [2022] ZACT 9 (15 March 2022)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved A.P. Moller – Maersk A/S’s acquisition of Senator International, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest Assessment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.