Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission of South Africa v Monnye and Khomo Construction CC (CO160Jan22; 2021FEB0014) [2022] ZACT 46; [2022] 1 CPLR 5 (CT) (27 January 2022)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Monnye and Khomo Construction CC as an order. Although Monnye did not admit liability, the Commission found sufficient evidence of collusive tendering in violation of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The Tribunal considered the respondent's small size, lack of previous contraventions, and cooperation with the Commission. The administrative penalty imposed does not exceed 10% of Monnye's annual turnover for the relevant financial year. Monnye is required to implement a competition law compliance programme and circulate its contents to all members and directors. The penalty is to be paid in two equal instalments within six months, and the Commission will transfer the funds to the National Revenue Fund. The agreement concludes all proceedings between the parties relating to the conduct under investigation.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Compliance programme required.

Orders

  • Monnye and Khomo Construction CC must pay an administrative penalty of R71,225 to the Commission in two equal instalments within six months of confirmation of the consent agreement.
  • Monnye must implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme and circulate its contents to all members and directors within 60 business days of confirmation.
  • Monnye must submit a copy of the compliance programme to the Commission within 60 calendar days of confirmation.
  • All reports and proof of payment must be submitted to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
  • The administrative penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Competition Act.
  • This consent agreement constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission's investigation under case number 2021FEB0014.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission of South Africa

Applicant

Monnye and Khomo Construction CC

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 71,225

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order / Confirmation of Consent Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission investigated a complaint from the Gauteng Provincial Treasury alleging collusion between Monnye and Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC in the submission of tender documents for the supply and delivery of groceries and toiletries. The Commission found evidence of collusive tendering, including similarities in bid documents and pricing, amounting to a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The Commission seeks confirmation of a consent agreement imposing an administrative penalty and compliance measures.
Respondent
Monnye and Khomo Construction CC does not admit liability or contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The respondent agrees to enter into the consent agreement without admission of liability, citing its small size, the minor value of the tender, lack of previous contraventions, and the fact that it did not win the tender. Monnye has cooperated fully with the Commission and undertakes to implement a compliance programme and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 89 of 1998, section 4(1)(b)(iii)

    Collusive tendering is prohibited under section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act, which forbids firms from engaging in practices that involve directly or indirectly fixing prices or trading conditions, or collusive bidding.

  2. 02

    Competition Act 89 of 1998, sections 49D and 58(1)(b)

    The Tribunal may confirm a consent agreement as an order in terms of section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act, provided the agreement is entered into voluntarily and addresses the contravention.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Monnye and Khomo Construction CC as an order. Although Monnye did not admit liability, the Commission found sufficient evidence of collusive tendering in violation of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The Tribunal considered the respondent's small size, lack of previous contraventions, and cooperation with the Commission. The administrative penalty imposed does not exceed 10% of Monnye's annual turnover for the relevant financial year. Monnye is required to implement a competition law compliance programme and circulate its contents to all members and directors. The penalty is to be paid in two equal instalments within six months, and the Commission will transfer the funds to the National Revenue Fund. The agreement concludes all proceedings between the parties relating to the conduct under investigation.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the importance of compliance programmes in preventing future anti-competitive conduct among small firms.
  • The Commission's willingness to settle without admission of liability reflects a pragmatic approach to enforcement where the value and impact of the contravention are limited.
  • The administrative penalty serves both punitive and deterrent purposes, even where the respondent did not win the tender.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Compliance programme required.

  • Monnye and Khomo Construction CC must pay an administrative penalty of R71,225 to the Commission in two equal instalments within six months of confirmation of the consent agreement.
  • Monnye must implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme and circulate its contents to all members and directors within 60 business days of confirmation.
  • Monnye must submit a copy of the compliance programme to the Commission within 60 calendar days of confirmation.
  • All reports and proof of payment must be submitted to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
  • The administrative penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Competition Act.
  • This consent agreement constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission's investigation under case number 2021FEB0014.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2022] ZACT 46

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: CO160Jan22

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission of South Africa Applicant

And

Monnye and Khomo Construction CC Respondent

Panel: AW Wessels (Presiding Member)

E Daniels (Tribunal Member)

L Mncube (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 27 January 2022

Decided on: 27 January 2022

CONSENT

AGREEMENT

The Tribunal hereby confirms, in terms of section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act,

Date: 27 January 2022

Presiding Member Mr Andreas Wessels

Concurring: Mr Enver Daniels and Dr. Liberty Mncube

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

CT CASE NO:

CC CASE NO: 2021FEB0014

COMPETITION

COMMISSION OF SA

Applicant

MONNYE

AND KHOMO CONSTRUCTION CC Respondent

CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D READ WITH SECTION 58(1) (b) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED, BETWEEN

THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND MONNYE AND KHOMO CONSTRUCTION CC, IN RESPECT OF A CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4(1)(b)(iii) OF THE COMPETITION ACT 89 OF 1998

Preamble

The Competition Commission (“Commission”) and Monnye Khomo Construction CC (“Monnye”) hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 49D read with section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act no. 89 of 1998, as amended (“the Act”), in respect of a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act.

1.

DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this consent agreement the following definitions shall apply

1.1. “Act” means the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended.

1.2. “Monnye and Khomo Construction CC” means a close corporation duly registered in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its registered place of business situated at 12 Botana Office Park, Embankment Road, Centurion.

1.3. “Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC” means a close corporation duly registered in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its registered place of business situated at 12 Botana Office Park, Embankment Road, Centurion.

1.4. “Commission” means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

1.5. “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of the Competition Commission (the

Commissioner) in terms of section 24(1) of the Act.

1.6. “Consent Agreement” means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Monnye.

1.7. “Gauteng Provincial Treasury” means a Treasury Department for the Gauteng Province, with its principal place of business at 75 Fox Street, Imbumba, House, Johannesburg

1.8. “GPT Tender” means tender issued by the Gauteng Provincial Treasury under tender number: GT/GPT/069/2018 for the supply and delivery of groceries and toiletries to the Gauteng Provincial Government (“GPG”) Institutions and State Information Technology Agency (“SITA”).

1.9. “Parties” means the Commission and Monnye.

1.10. “Tribunal” means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at the 1st Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

2. COMMISSION’S INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS

2.1. On 24 February 2021, the Commission received a complaint from the Gauteng Provincial Treasury (“GPT”) in terms of section 49B(2)(b) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended (“the Act”). The GPT alleged that Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC (“Mokgatshelwa”) and Monnye colluded when tendering for the GPT Tender.

2.2. The GPT Tender was for the supply and delivery of groceries and toiletries to the GPG Institutions and SITA.

2.3. This complaint was investigated under case number 2016MAR0077.

2.4. The Commission’s investigation found that on or about February 2021, Mokgatshelwa and Monnye assisted each other when completing tender documents for GT/GPT/069/2018 Tender as evidenced by, inter alia, similarities in in their bid documents including pricing.

2.5. The conduct between Mokgatshelwa and Monnye amounts to collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act.

3.

ADMISSION

3.1. Monnye does not admit that it has acted in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act as described in paragraph 2 above.

3.2. The Commission has agreed to enter into the Consent Agreement without admission of liability with Monnye based on the following factors:

3.2.1 Monnye is a small firm;

3.2.2 Given the small size of Monnye as well as the small size of the tender, the Commission does not consider it worthy to engage in protracted and costly litigation with Monnye;

3.2.3 Monnye has not won the tender in question; and

3.2.4 Monnye has never contravene the Act before.

4. CO-OPERATION

4.1. Monnye has provided full and expeditious co-operation to the Commission concerning the prohibited practice.

5.

AGREEMENT REGARDING FUTURE CONDUCT

5.1. Monnye undertakes to refrain from engaging in any anti-competitive conduct in contravention of the Act in future.

5.2. Monnye will develop, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that all its members and board of directors do not engage in future contraventions of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme will include mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring and detection of any contraventions of the Act.

5.3. Monnye shall circulate a statement summarising the contents of this Consent Agreement to all its members and board of directors within 60 (sixty) business days from the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement by the Tribunal.

6.

ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY

6.1. Monnye agrees that it is liable to pay an administrative penalty of R71 225 (Seventy-One Thousand, Two Hundred and Twenty-Five Rand). This amount does not exceed 10% of Monnye’s annual turnover for the financial year ending February 2021

6.2. Monnye will pay R71 225 (Seventy-One Thousand, Two Hundred and Twenty- Five Rand) to the Commission within 6 months in two equal instalments after the confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal. The first payment to be made within 30 (thirty) days after confirmation of the settlement agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

6.3. The payment shall be made into the Commission’s bank account, details of which are as follows:

Bank name:

Absa Bank

Branch name:

Pretoria

Account holder:

Competition Commission Fees

Account Account number: [….]

Account type:

Current Account

Branch Code:

632005

Reference:

2021FEB0014/MONNYE

6.4. The penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

7.

MONITORING

7.1. Monnye undertakes to submit a copy of the compliance programme referred to in clause 5.2 to the Commission within 60 calendar days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order to the Tribunal.

7.2. All reports in relation to conditions set out in this agreement, including but not limited to compliance programmes, proof of payment(s) etc, shall be submitted to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.

8.

FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT

8.1. This Consent Agreement is entered into in full and final settlement of the Commission’s investigation under case number: 2021FEB0014 and upon confirmation as an order of the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Monnye relating to the conduct that is the subject of the Commission’s investigation under case number: 2021FEB0014.

Dated and signed at _Midrand on the _6th day of _December 2021.

FOR THE COMMISSION:

TEMBINKOSI

BONAKELE

Commissioner

Dated and signed at PRETORIA on the _14 day of _DECEMBER 2021.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 89 of 1998, sections 4(1)(b)(iii), 49B(2)(b), 49D, 58(1)(b), 59(4)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.