Competition Commission of South Africa v Monnye and Khomo Construction CC (CO160Jan22; 2021FEB0014) [2022] ZACT 46; [2022] 1 CPLR 5 (CT) (27 January 2022)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Monnye and Khomo Construction CC (CO160Jan22; 2021FEB0014) [2022] ZACT 46; [2022] 1 CPLR 5 (CT) (27 January 2022)

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Monnye and Khomo Construction CC as an order. Although Monnye did not admit liability, the Commission found sufficient evidence of collusive tendering in violation of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The Tribunal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] ZACT 46
Parties
Applicant: Competition Commission of South Africa; Respondent: Monnye and Khomo Construction CC
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
CO160Jan22
Procedural Posture
Consent Order / Confirmation of Consent Agreement
Outcome
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Compliance programme required.
Judges
AW Wessels, E Daniels, L Mncube
Legal Topics
Collusive Tendering, Administrative Penalty, Consent Agreement, Section 4 1 B Iii, Compliance Programme
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Collusive Tendering Administrative Penalty Consent Agreement Section 4 1 B Iii Compliance Programme

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Competition Commission of South Africa

Applicant

Monnye and Khomo Construction CC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Consent Order / Confirmation of Consent Agreement

  1. 1 Whether Monnye and Khomo Construction CC contravened section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act by engaging in collusive tendering.
  2. 2 Whether the consent agreement should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal without admission of liability.
  3. 3 What administrative penalty and compliance measures are appropriate under the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Monnye and Khomo Construction CC as an order. Although Monnye did not admit liability, the Commission found sufficient evidence of collusive tendering in violation of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The Tribunal considered the respondent's small size, lack of previous contraventions, and cooperation with the Commission. The administrative penalty imposed does not exceed 10% of Monnye's annual turnover for the relevant financial year. Monnye is required to implement a competition law compliance programme and circulate its contents to all members and directors. The penalty is to be paid in two...

Court Disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Compliance programme required.

Orders

  • Monnye and Khomo Construction CC must pay an administrative penalty of R71,225 to the Commission in two equal instalments within six months of confirmation of the consent agreement.
  • Monnye must implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme and circulate its contents to all members and directors within 60 business days of confirmation.