Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2024] ZACT 22

Competition Commission v Mix Telematics International (Pty) Ltd (CR011Apr19/SA010Apr24)

Competition Commission v Mix Telematics International (Pty) Ltd (CR011Apr19/SA010Apr24) [2024] ZACT 22 (27 June 2024)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement resolving allegations of customer allocation and market division and imposed a R250,000 penalty.

  • Market Division
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B
  • Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2024] ZACT 6

Competition Commission v Pistorius N.O. and Others (CR150Oct13/SA 155Dec23)

Competition Commission v Pistorius N.O. and Others (CR150Oct13/SA 155Dec23) [2024] ZACT 6 (13 February 2024)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a settlement resolving allegations that H Pistorius & Co imposed minimum resale prices for agricultural lime, with payments and compliance undertakings ordered.

  • Resale Price Maintenance
  • Vertical Restrictions
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Section 5 2 Competition Act
  • Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 43

Competition Commission v Enviro Options (Pty) Ltd (CR205Mar21; SA014May23; CR206Mar21; SA013May23)

Competition Commission v Enviro Options (Pty) Ltd (CR205Mar21; SA014May23; CR206Mar21; SA013May23) [2023] ZACT 43; [2023] 3 CPLR 47 (CT) (4 August 2023)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a settlement over collusive tendering and market division involving Enviro Options, imposed a R745,000 penalty, and required compliance steps.

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Price Fixing
  • Market Division
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Competition Act Section 4
  • Compliance Programme
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 46

Competition Commission of South Africa v Monnye and Khomo Construction CC (CO160Jan22; 2021FEB0014)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Monnye and Khomo Construction CC (CO160Jan22; 2021FEB0014) [2022] ZACT 46; [2022] 1 CPLR 5 (CT) (27 January 2022)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement finding collusive tendering and imposed a R71,225 administrative penalty plus compliance obligations.

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B Iii
  • Compliance Programme
  • Collusive-tendering
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 44

Competition Commission of South Africa v Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC (CO159Jan22)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC (CO159Jan22) [2022] ZACT 44; [2022] 1 CPLR 4 (CT) (27 January 2022)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement for collusive tendering in a Gauteng Treasury procurement, imposing an R499,669 penalty and compliance undertakings.

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B Iii
  • Compliance Programme
  • Collusive-tendering
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 104

Competition Commission v SAAB Grintek Defence (Pty) Ltd (CR010Apr19; SA138Dec21)

Competition Commission v SAAB Grintek Defence (Pty) Ltd (CR010Apr19; SA138Dec21) [2021] ZACT 104 (8 December 2021)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a settlement between the Competition Commission and SAAB Grintek Defence over alleged collusive tendering, imposing a R2 million penalty and compliance undertakings.

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Enterprise Development
  • Section 4 1 B Iii
  • Consent Agreement
  • Compliance Programme
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 105

Competition Commission v K.F Computers CC (CR010Apr19; SA134Dec21)

Competition Commission v K.F Computers CC (CR010Apr19; SA134Dec21) [2021] ZACT 105 (8 December 2021)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement settling a collusive tendering complaint against K.F Computers CC and imposed a R32,135 administrative penalty.

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B Iii
  • Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 102

Competition Commission v BMS Medical CC (CO086Oct21)

Competition Commission v BMS Medical CC (CO086Oct21) [2021] ZACT 102; [2023] 1 CPLR 7 (CT) (12 October 2021)

The Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement settling a collusive tendering complaint against BMS Medical CC and imposed a R20,000 penalty and compliance measures.

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B Iii
  • Compliance Programme
  • Collusive-tendering
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 95

Competition Commission of South Africa v Jasco Security and Fire Solutions (Pty) Ltd (CR086Aug19; SA044Jul21)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Jasco Security and Fire Solutions (Pty) Ltd (CR086Aug19; SA044Jul21) [2021] ZACT 95 (16 September 2021)

The Tribunal confirmed a settlement between the Competition Commission and Jasco Fire over alleged market division, imposing a R300,000 penalty and compliance duties.

  • Market Division
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B Ii
  • Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 59

Competition Commission v MAHLE GmbH and Another (CO104Aug20)

Competition Commission v MAHLE GmbH and Another (CO104Aug20) [2020] ZACT 59 (14 September 2020)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement in a cartel matter, imposing a R1,622,106 penalty on MAHLE Behr for collusive conduct involving HVAC tenders.

  • Cartel Conduct
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Section 4 1 B Contravention
  • Consent Agreement
  • Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.