Competition Commission v African Oxygen Limited (019976) [2015] ZACT 38; [2015] 1 CPLR 143 (CT) (22 April 2015)
The Tribunal confirmed that the SCI Agreement and Air Products Agreements contained restraints that divided the market for carbon dioxide and urea, and precluded competition in contravention of sections 4(1)(b)(ii) and 5(1) of the Competition Act. The exclusivity provisions resulted in input foreclosure and substantial prevention and lessening of competition. Although African Oxygen Limited did not admit to the Commission's findings, it accepted that the restraints amounted to contraventions and agreed to amend the agreements and pay an administrative penalty. The Tribunal found the administrative penalty appropriate and confirmed the consent agreement as an order, thereby concluding all...
- Citation
- [2015] ZACT 38
- Parties
- Applicant: Competition Commission; Respondent: African Oxygen Limited
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2015
- Case Number
- 019976
- Procedural Posture
- Settlement Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement
- Outcome
- Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Proceedings between the Commission and African Oxygen Limited relating to the alleged contraventions are concluded.
- Judges
- N Manoim, Y Carrim, A Wessels
- Legal Topics
- Market Division, Vertical Agreements, Administrative Penalty, Input Foreclosure, Consent Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Competition Commission
Applicant
African Oxygen Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Settlement Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the SCI Agreement and Air Products Agreements contravene section 4(1)(b)(ii) and section 5(1) of the Competition Act by dividing markets and restricting competition.
- 2 Whether the exclusivity provisions in the agreements result in input foreclosure and substantial prevention or lessening of competition.
- 3 Whether the administrative penalty imposed is appropriate under the Competition Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed that the SCI Agreement and Air Products Agreements contained restraints that divided the market for carbon dioxide and urea, and precluded competition in contravention of sections 4(1)(b)(ii) and 5(1) of the Competition Act. The exclusivity provisions resulted in input foreclosure and substantial prevention and lessening of competition. Although African Oxygen Limited did not admit to the Commission's findings, it accepted that the restraints amounted to contraventions and agreed to amend the agreements and pay an administrative penalty. The Tribunal found the administrative penalty appropriate and confirmed the consent agreement as an order, thereby concluding all...
Court Disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Proceedings between the Commission and African Oxygen Limited relating to the alleged contraventions are concluded.
Orders
- The consent agreement as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and African Oxygen Limited is confirmed.
- African Oxygen Limited shall pay an administrative penalty of R3,269,865 to the Competition Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the consent agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment