Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2024] ZACT 22

Competition Commission v Mix Telematics International (Pty) Ltd (CR011Apr19/SA010Apr24)

Competition Commission v Mix Telematics International (Pty) Ltd (CR011Apr19/SA010Apr24) [2024] ZACT 22 (27 June 2024)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement resolving allegations of customer allocation and market division and imposed a R250,000 penalty.

  • Market Division
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B
  • Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2024] ZACT 24

Streamlight FX (Pty) Ltd and Another v Genesis One Lighting (Pty) Ltd (IR029JUN2023)

Streamlight FX (Pty) Ltd and Another v Genesis One Lighting (Pty) Ltd (IR029JUN2023) [2024] ZACT 24 (18 June 2024)

The Competition Tribunal dismissed an interim relief application seeking to suspend a High Court restraint, holding compliance with the order was not a concerted practice.

  • Interim Relief
  • Market Division
  • Concerted Practice
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Interim-relief
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 43

Competition Commission v Enviro Options (Pty) Ltd (CR205Mar21; SA014May23; CR206Mar21; SA013May23)

Competition Commission v Enviro Options (Pty) Ltd (CR205Mar21; SA014May23; CR206Mar21; SA013May23) [2023] ZACT 43; [2023] 3 CPLR 47 (CT) (4 August 2023)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a settlement over collusive tendering and market division involving Enviro Options, imposed a R745,000 penalty, and required compliance steps.

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Price Fixing
  • Market Division
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Competition Act Section 4
  • Compliance Programme
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACAC 3

Life Wise (Pty) Ltd t/a Eldan Auto Body v Competition Commission of South Africa (197/CAC/Nov21)

Life Wise (Pty) Ltd t/a Eldan Auto Body v Competition Commission of South Africa (197/CAC/Nov21) [2022] ZACAC 3; [2022] 1 CPLR 3 (CAC) (8 April 2022)

The Competition Appeal Court upheld the refusal to vary a consent order to remove admissions of collusive conduct, finding no exceptional circumstances.

  • Consent Order Variation
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Collusive Tendering
  • Price Fixing
  • Market Division
  • Public Interest Remedies
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 114

Competition Commission of South Africa v ZTE Corporation South Africa (Pty) Ltd (CR015Apr16; SA043Jul21)

Competition Commission of South Africa v ZTE Corporation South Africa (Pty) Ltd (CR015Apr16; SA043Jul21) [2021] ZACT 114; [2023] 1 CPLR 6 (CT) (5 October 2021)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement resolving allegations that ZTE SA and ZTE Mzanzi divided customers in the telecommunications market.

  • Market Division
  • Consent Agreement
  • Settlement Amount
  • Section 4 1 B Ii Contravention
  • Competition Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 95

Competition Commission of South Africa v Jasco Security and Fire Solutions (Pty) Ltd (CR086Aug19; SA044Jul21)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Jasco Security and Fire Solutions (Pty) Ltd (CR086Aug19; SA044Jul21) [2021] ZACT 95 (16 September 2021)

The Tribunal confirmed a settlement between the Competition Commission and Jasco Fire over alleged market division, imposing a R300,000 penalty and compliance duties.

  • Market Division
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B Ii
  • Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 69

Competition Commission v T.RAD Company Limited (CO112Sep20)

Competition Commission v T.RAD Company Limited (CO112Sep20) [2020] ZACT 69 (21 September 2020)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement between the Competition Commission and T.RAD, imposing a R500,000 penalty and compliance undertakings.

  • Cartel Conduct
  • Price Fixing
  • Market Division
  • Collusive Tendering
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 63

Competition Commission v Panasonic Corporation (CO103Aug20)

Competition Commission v Panasonic Corporation (CO103Aug20) [2020] ZACT 63 (16 September 2020)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Panasonic Corporation, imposing a R537,980 penalty and compliance undertakings.

  • Cartel Conduct
  • Price Fixing
  • Market Division
  • Collusive Tendering
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 67

Competition Commission v Yazaki Corporation (CO079Aug20)

Competition Commission v Yazaki Corporation (CO079Aug20) [2020] ZACT 67 (21 August 2020)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Yazaki Corporation, imposed a penalty, and required compliance measures for alleged cartel conduct.

  • Cartel Conduct
  • Price Fixing
  • Market Division
  • Collusive Tendering
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Cartel-conduct
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 102

Competition Commission v Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd (CO023May20; 2014Nov0688)

Competition Commission v Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd (CO023May20; 2014Nov0688) [2020] ZACT 102 (18 May 2020)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement admitting market division and collusive tendering in a Daimler exhaust systems tender, and imposed an administrative penalty.

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Market Division
  • Price Fixing
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Collusive-tendering
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.