Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd (CR025May12/SA113Aug15) [2015] ZACT 124; [2015] 2 CPLR 532 (CT) (16 September 2015)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd admitted to engaging in price fixing with its competitor, Maksal Tubes (Pty) Ltd, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The settlement agreement, which included an administrative penalty of R8,000,000.00 and undertakings regarding future compliance, was found to be consistent with the Act and in the public interest. The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and CTA relating to the alleged contravention.

Court disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Proceedings between the Commission and Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd are concluded.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R8,000,000.00 to the Competition Commission within one month of confirmation.
  • Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd must implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
  • Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd must circulate a summary of the settlement agreement to all management and operational staff within 60 days.
  • The administrative penalty must be paid into the Commission's designated bank account and will be transferred to the National Revenue Fund.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant Counsel: Tembinkosi Bonakele

Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: David Machet

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 8,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Settlement Confirmation / Settlement Agreement Confirmation and Order

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd, together with Maksal Tubes (Pty) Ltd, engaged in price fixing in the market for copper plumbing tubes from early 2006 until at least 2009, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The Commission submitted that the conduct was admitted by CTA and that the settlement agreement, including the administrative penalty, was appropriate and in line with the Act.
Respondent
Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act by agreeing with its competitor to fix the selling price of copper plumbing tube products. CTA agreed to desist from such conduct, implement a compliance programme, and pay the agreed administrative penalty. CTA accepted the terms of the settlement agreement and requested its confirmation as an order of the Tribunal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

    Section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act prohibits agreements between competitors to fix prices directly or indirectly.

  2. 02

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

    Section 58(1)(a)(iii) read with sections 59(1)(a), 59(2), and 59(3) of the Competition Act empowers the Tribunal to impose administrative penalties for prohibited practices.

  3. 03

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

    A settlement agreement may be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal if it is consistent with the Act and serves the public interest.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd admitted to engaging in price fixing with its competitor, Maksal Tubes (Pty) Ltd, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The settlement agreement, which included an administrative penalty of R8,000,000.00 and undertakings regarding future compliance, was found to be consistent with the Act and in the public interest. The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and CTA relating to the alleged contravention.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the importance of competition law compliance programmes in preventing future contraventions.
  • The Tribunal observed that the administrative penalty did not exceed the statutory maximum and was appropriate given the circumstances.
  • The Tribunal highlighted the role of corporate leniency policies in uncovering anti-competitive conduct.

Court disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Proceedings between the Commission and Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd are concluded.

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R8,000,000.00 to the Competition Commission within one month of confirmation.
  • Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd must implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
  • Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd must circulate a summary of the settlement agreement to all management and operational staff within 60 days.
  • The administrative penalty must be paid into the Commission's designated bank account and will be transferred to the National Revenue Fund.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2015] ZACT 124

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC

OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: CR025May12/SA113Aug15

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission Applicant

And

Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd Respondent

Panel

: M Mazwai (Presiding Member)

A Roskam (Tribunal Member)

A Ndoni (Tribunal Member)

Heard on

: 16 September 2015

Decided on

: 16 September 2015

Settlement Agreement

The Tribunal hereby confirms the settlement agreement as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd annexed hereto marked "A", read with the addendum marked "B".

16 September 2015

Date

______

Presiding Member

Ms M Mazwai

Concurring: Mr A Roskam and Ms A Ndoni

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

(HELOIN PRETORIA)

CT Case No: 56/CR/May 12

CC Case No: 2008 Nov4111

In the matter between

THE

COMPETITION

COMMISSION

Applicant

and

COPPER TUBING AFRICA (PTY) LTD Respondent

SETTLEMENT

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND COPPER TUBING AFRICA (PTY) TO IN REGARD TO AN ALLEGED

CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4(1)(B)(I) OF THECOMPETITION ACT NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED.

Preamble

The Competition Commission ("Commission") and Copper Tubing Africa (P1.y) Ltd ("CTA") hereby agree that an application

be made to the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal"} fur the confirmation of this Settlement Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 490 as read with seclions 58 (1)(a}{iii) and 59{1)(a} of the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended ("the Act"). on the terms set out below.

1. Definitions

For the purposes of this Consent Agreement the following definitions shall apply:

1.1. "Act" means the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended;

1.2. "Arkam" means Arkam Trading CC a close corporation duly incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business situated at 11Springbok Road, Longdale, Johannesburg.

1.3. "Commission" means tile Competition Commission of Soulh Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTl Campus, 77 Meintjles Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;

1.4. "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of !he Competition Commission, appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act;

1.5. "Complaint" means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner in temrs of section

49B( 1) of the Act under case number: 2008 Nov4111;

1.6. "CTA" means Copper Tubing Africa (Ply) Ltd, a company duly registered and incorporated in terms of the company laws of tile Republic of South Africa, having its principal place of business situated at 18 Cleveland Road, Cleveland, Johannesburg, Gauteng;

1.7. "Maksal" means Maksal Tubes (Ply) Ltd, a company duly reglslered and incorporated in terms of tile company laws of the Republic of South Africa, having its principal place of business situated at Industry Road, New Era, 1559 Springs, Gauteng;

1.8. "Parties" means the Commission and CTA;

1.9. "Respondent" means CTA;

1.10. "Settlement Agreement'' means this agreement duly signed and concluded between

the Commission and CTA;

1.11. "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body eslablished in terms of sec!lon 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business al Mulayo building (Block C), the DTI campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;and

1.12. “WHS” means Wholesale Housing Supplies (Pty) Ltd, a private company duly incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business situated at 2 Eton Road, Parktown, Johannesburg.

2. The Complaint and Complaint Investigation

2.1. On 03 April 2009, the Commissioner inl!iated a complaint in terms of section 498 (1) of the Act against Maksal, CTA, WHS and Arkam for possible contravenlion of section 4(1)(b)(i), 4(1)(b)(ii) and 5(1) of the Act The complaint was initiated pursuant to the investigation of a third party complaint which was lodged with the Commission but was later withdrawn.

2.2. On 14 March 2012, following receipt of a leniency appl cation by Maksal dated 23 November :moo in terms of the Commission's Corporate Leniency Pol cy ("CLP"). The Commissioner amended the initiation statement of 3 April 2009.

2.3. In its CLP application, Maksal submitted that it and CTA had engaged in price fixing and market division in the market for the manufacture and supply of copper plumbing tubes in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Act.

2.4. During the course of l!s investigation, the Applicant found that the section 4(1)(b)(ii) contravention i.e market division, had ceased in 2000 which is more than three years prior to the Commission's initiation. The Commission therefore non-referred this aspect of the complaint as it had prescribed in terms of section 87(1) of the Act Regarding the alleged contravention of section 5(1) i.e restrictive vertical practices, the Commission took a decision not to refer a complaint wl!h regard to this alleged contravention on the basis of insufficient evidence.

2.5. The Commission's investigation however revealed that in the period from about early 2006 until al least 2009, CTA and Maksal agreed with each other in respect of price adjustments for copper plumbing lubes, as well as the liming to effect such adjustments.

3. The Complaint Referral

3.1. Following its investigation, the Commission concluded that the conduct by Maksal and CTA constituted a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act, in that they agreed, alternatively engaged in a concerted practice to directly or indirectly lix the purchase or selling price of copper plumbing tubes.

3.2. In light of its findings, the Commission decidedlo refer the complaint on 5 July 2012 to the Tribunalfor determination.

4. Statement of Conduct

CTA admits that it has contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act, In that from the period commencing early 2006 until at least 2000, it agreed with its competitor, Maksal,to f!X the selling price of an copper plumbing tube products.

5. Agreement concerningthe Respondent's future conduct

5.1. CTA agraesto:

5.1.1. the extent that it is in existence, provide evidence, written or otherwise, which is in its possession or under its control, concerning the alleged comraventions coritained in this Settlement Agreemem.

5.1.2. desist from the conduct deseribed above.

5.1.3. develop, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme incorporallng corporate governance designed to ensure that its employees, management, directors and agents do not engage in future contraventions of the Act In particular, such compliance programme will Include the following:

5.1.3.1. a competition policy to be drafted and Implemented by CTA;

5.1.3.2. provide specific training on competition law aspects particularly relevant to CTA;

5.1.3.3. ensure that such training wiU be made available lo all new employees joining CTA. 'furthermore, CTA will update such training annually to ensure on an on-going basis that it and its members cannot engage in

any anti-compelltive actM!les.

5.1A To submit a copy of such compliance programme to the Commission within 00 days of the date of confirmation of the Settlement

Agreement as an order by the Competition Tribunal;

5.1.5. To circulate a statement summarising the contents of this Settlement Agreement to all management and operational staff employed at CTA within 00 days from the date of confirmation of this Settlement Agreement by the Tribunal;

6. Administrative Penalty

6.1. Having regard to the provisions of sections 58(1)(a)(Ul) as read with sections 59(1)(a),

59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, CTA accepts that it is liable to pay an administrative penalty.

6.2. The parties have agreed that CTA will pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R

8,000,000.00 (Eight million rand);

6.3. This amount does not exceed 10"At of CTA's total annual income in the Republic and its exports from the Republic for its 2008 financial year;

6.4. CTA will pay the amount set out in paragraph 6.2 above to the Commission within one month from the date of confirmation of this Settlement Agreement as an order by the Tribunal.

6.5. The penalty must be paid into the Commission's bank account which is as foftows:

Name:

The Competition Commission Fee Account

Bank:

Absa Bank, Pretoria

Account Number: […..........]

Branch Code: 323 345

Reference: CTA/ 2008 Nov4111

6.a. The penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with the provisions of section 59(4) of the Act.

7. Full and Final Settlement

This agreement, upon confirmation as an order by the Tribunal, is entered into in fulland final setllement and 0011ciudes aH proceedings

betwllen !he Commission and CTA relating to any alleged contravention of the Act by the respondent that is the subject of the Commission's

Investigation referred to the Tribunal under CT Case No. 2008 Nov4111.

Date and signed at Simonstown on the 17th day of August 2015

For Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd

________

David Machet (duly authorised)

Former CEO Of Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd

Dated and slgned at Pretoria on the 24th day of August 2015

For the Competition Commission

______

Tembinkosi Bonakele

Competition Commissioner

IN

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

(HELD AT PRETORIA)

CTCase No: CR025May121SA113Aug15

THE

COMPETITION COMMISSION Applicant

COPPER TUBING AFRICA (PTY) LTD Respondent

FILING

SHEET

BE PLEASED TO TAKE NOTICE that the applicant hereby files the addendum to the settlement agreement con.eluded between· the

Competition Commission and Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd.

Dated at PRETORIA on this the 16th day of September 2015.

_____

COMPETITION

COMMISSION

DTI Campus

77 Melnljies Street Sunnyside, Pretoria

Tel: 012 394 3335

Ref: K. Ayayee I J. Ngobeni

E-mail: korkoia@comocom .cocza /

jabulanin@compcom.co.za

To:

THE REGISTRAR

Competition Tribunal

3rd Floor, Mulayo

The DTI Campus

77 Meintjies Street

Sunnyside, Pretoria

Tel: (0.12) 394-3300/55

E-mail address: Leratom@comptrib.co.za

And to: FLUXMANS INC.

Respondent's Attorneys

30 Jellicoe Avenue, Rosebank Johannesburg; ·SouthAfrica. Tel: +27 11 328 1835

Ref: Andile Nikani

E-mail address anikani@fluxrnans.com

ADDENDUM

TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION. ANO COPPER TUBING AFRICA (PTY) LTD

The parties agree that the clause set ouihereunder shall replace clause 3.2 of the attached Settlement Agreement signed by the Competition

Commissioner dated 24 Augusf 2015.

3.2 In light of its findings, the Commission decided to refer the complaint on 22 May 2012 to the Tribunal. for determination.

Dated and signed at Rosebank on the 16th day of Sept 2015

____

Andile Nikani (authorised)

Attorney for Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd

Dated and signed at Rosebank on the 16th day of Sept 2015

Bukhosibakhe Majenge (duly authorised)

Chief Legal Counsel

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.