Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2019] ZACT 19

Competition Commission v Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd (CR087Mar10/SA253Feb19)

Competition Commission v Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd (CR087Mar10/SA253Feb19) [2019] ZACT 19 (13 March 2019)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a settlement in which Paramount Mills admitted price fixing in the white maize milling market and accepted an administrative penalty.

  • Price Fixing
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B I
  • Corporate Leniency Policy
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 59

Goodyear South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission, Continental Tyres South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission; In re: Competition Commission v Apollo Tyres South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (CR053Aug10/PIL225Sec16)

Goodyear South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission, Continental Tyres South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission; In re: Competition Commission v Apollo Tyres South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (CR053Aug10/PIL225Sec16) [2017] ZACT 59; [2017] 1 CPLR 460 (CT) (2 June 2017)

The Tribunal dismissed Goodyear and Continental’s in limine challenges to the Commission’s referral, finding the referral timely and technical service defects condonable.

  • Complaint Referral
  • Jurisdiction Of Tribunal
  • Filing And Service Requirements
  • Condonation Of Non Compliance
  • Section 4 1 B I
  • Tribunal Rules Interpretation
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2015] ZACT 124

Competition Commission v Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd (CR025May12/SA113Aug15)

Competition Commission v Copper Tubing Africa (Pty) Ltd (CR025May12/SA113Aug15) [2015] ZACT 124; [2015] 2 CPLR 532 (CT) (16 September 2015)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a settlement over copper tube price fixing, imposed a R8 million penalty, and ordered compliance measures.

  • Price Fixing
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B I
  • Corporate Leniency Policy
  • Price-fixing
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2015] ZACT 41

Competition Commission v Albatross Fishing & Cycling (Sole Proprietorship) (CR049Jul12/SA209Feb15 (020800))

Competition Commission v Albatross Fishing & Cycling (Sole Proprietorship) (CR049Jul12/SA209Feb15 (020800)) [2015] ZACT 41; [2015] 1 CPLR 152 (CT) (29 April 2015)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement finding Albatros Fishing & Cycling admitted cartel conduct under section 4(1)(b)(i) and undertook compliance measures.

  • Cartel Conduct
  • Price Fixing
  • Section 4 1 B I
  • Consent Agreement
  • Compliance Training
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2015] ZACT 39

Competition Commission v Albatros Fishing & Cycling (Sole Proprietorship) Previously named Winners Cycles (Pty) Ltd (CR049Jul12/SA209Feb15 (020800))

Competition Commission v Albatros Fishing & Cycling (Sole Proprietorship) Previously named Winners Cycles (Pty) Ltd (CR049Jul12/SA209Feb15 (020800)) [2015] ZACT 39 (29 April 2015)

The Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement resolving allegations that Albatros participated in cartel conduct and price fixing in the cycling sector.

  • Price Fixing
  • Cartel Conduct
  • Section 4 1 B I
  • Consent Agreement
  • Compliance Training
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2014] ZACT 27

Coolheat Cycle Agencies (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission; In Re: Competition Comission v Fritz Pienaar Cycles (Pty) Ltd and Others (73/CR/Jul12, 015438)

Coolheat Cycle Agencies (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission; In Re: Competition Comission v Fritz Pienaar Cycles (Pty) Ltd and Others (73/CR/Jul12, 015438) [2014] ZACT 27 (20 February 2014)

The Tribunal dismissed Coolheat’s second exception, holding the section 4(1)(b)(i) issue involved factual disputes about RRP pricing and should go to trial.

  • Horizontal Price Fixing
  • Recommended Retail Price
  • Exception Application
  • Section 4 1 B I
  • Concerted Practices
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2013] ZACT 79

Competition Commission v DBS Distributing CC ta Thule Car Rack Systems CC (016840)

Competition Commission v DBS Distributing CC ta Thule Car Rack Systems CC (016840) [2013] ZACT 79 (24 July 2013)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a settlement with Thule over alleged price-fixing conduct in the cycling sector and ordered compliance undertakings.

  • Price Fixing
  • Cartel Conduct
  • Section 4 1 B I
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Future Conduct Undertakings
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 38

Competition Commission v Singapore Airlines Ltd (45/CR/Apr12)

Competition Commission v Singapore Airlines Ltd (45/CR/Apr12) [2012] ZACT 38; [2012] 2 CPLR 245 (CT) (15 May 2012)

The Tribunal confirmed a consent order settling a cartel complaint against Singapore Airlines and imposed an administrative penalty of R25,106,692.

  • Cartel Conduct
  • Price Fixing
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Order
  • Section 4 1 B I
  • Corporate Leniency Policy
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2011] ZACT 68

Competition Commission v Overberg Agri Bedrywe (Pty) Ltd, In re: Competition Commission v Afgri Operations Ltd and Others (43/CR/Jun11)

Competition Commission v Overberg Agri Bedrywe (Pty) Ltd, In re: Competition Commission v Afgri Operations Ltd and Others (43/CR/Jun11) [2011] ZACT 68; [2011] 2 CPLR 280 (CT) (7 September 2011)

The Tribunal confirmed a consent agreement in which Overberg Agri Bedrywe admitted limited participation in tariff-setting for grain storage and agreed to a penalty and compliance measures.

  • Horizontal Price Fixing
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Consent Agreement
  • Section 4 1 B I
  • Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.