Competition Commission v Egoli Gas (Pty) Ltd (2009Jan4212) [2013] ZACT 20; [2013] 1 CPLR 73 (CT) (28 March 2013)
The Tribunal confirmed that the suite of agreements between Egoli Gas and Sasol Gas contained customer and territorial restraints amounting to market allocation, which is a prohibited practice under section 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Competition Act. The regulatory framework, including the Gas Licence By-Laws, did not authorise such market allocation or prevent competition between gas reticulators and distributors. Egoli Gas admitted the contravention and agreed to cancel the offending agreements, refrain from future market allocation, implement a compliance programme, and pay an administrative penalty. The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement as an order, including the undertakings and...
- Citation
- [2013] ZACT 20
- Parties
- Applicant: Competition Commission; Respondent: Egoli Gas (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2013
- Case Number
- 2009Jan4212
- Procedural Posture
- Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement
- Outcome
- Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Egoli Gas admitted contravention, agreed to compliance undertakings, and is liable for an administrative penalty.
- Judges
- N Manoim, M Mokuena, M Holden
- Legal Topics
- Market Allocation, Prohibited Practices, Administrative Penalty, Consent Agreement, Gas Distribution, Compliance Programme
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Competition Commission
Applicant
Egoli Gas (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suite of agreements between Egoli Gas and Sasol Gas constituted market allocation in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Competition Act.
- 2 Whether the regulatory framework permitted or prohibited such customer and territorial restraints.
- 3 Whether Egoli Gas is liable for an administrative penalty for the contravention.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed that the suite of agreements between Egoli Gas and Sasol Gas contained customer and territorial restraints amounting to market allocation, which is a prohibited practice under section 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Competition Act. The regulatory framework, including the Gas Licence By-Laws, did not authorise such market allocation or prevent competition between gas reticulators and distributors. Egoli Gas admitted the contravention and agreed to cancel the offending agreements, refrain from future market allocation, implement a compliance programme, and pay an administrative penalty. The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement as an order, including the undertakings and...
Court Disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Egoli Gas admitted contravention, agreed to compliance undertakings, and is liable for an administrative penalty.
Orders
- The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Egoli Gas (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Egoli Gas shall pay an administrative penalty of R1,627,910.76 to the Commission within thirty days of confirmation of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment