Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd (CO023May20; 2014Nov0688) [2020] ZACT 102 (18 May 2020)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd. Faurecia admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(ii) and (iii) of the Competition Act by engaging in market division and collusive tendering with Eberspacher in respect of a Daimler AG tender. The Tribunal found that the consent agreement, including Faurecia's undertakings to cooperate, implement compliance measures, and pay an administrative penalty of R66,885.66, was appropriate and in accordance with the Act. The order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Faurecia in respect of the investigation under case number 2014Nov0688.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Proceedings between the Commission and Faurecia concluded.

Orders

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Faurecia shall pay an administrative penalty of R66,885.66 to the Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the order.
  • Faurecia shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
  • Faurecia shall circulate a summary of the consent agreement to its employees, managers, and directors within 14 days.
  • Faurecia shall cooperate with the Commission in the prosecution of the remaining respondent.
  • All compliance reports and proof of payment shall be forwarded to the Commission.
  • This order constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission's investigation into Faurecia under case number 2014Nov0688.

02

Material facts

Parties

The Competition Commission

Applicant Counsel: Tembinkosi Bonakele

Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Sabine Reoule

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 66,885.66

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that Faurecia, together with Eberspacher, engaged in market division and collusive tendering in respect of a Daimler AG tender for motor vehicle exhaust systems for the Mercedes Benz C-Class W204 platform in 2003. The Commission submitted that Faurecia focused only on the diesel portions of the RFQ, while Eberspacher focused on the gasoline portions, resulting in both parties being awarded separate portions of the tender. This conduct contravened section 4(1)(b)(ii) and (iii) of the Competition Act. The Commission sought confirmation of the consent agreement, including Faurecia's admission, cooperation undertakings, future compliance measures, and the agreed administrative penalty.
Respondent
Faurecia admitted to engaging in prohibited practices as described by the Commission, specifically market division and collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(ii) and (iii) of the Competition Act. Faurecia agreed to cooperate fully with the Commission in its prosecution of the remaining respondent, to implement a competition law compliance programme, and to pay an administrative penalty of R66,885.66 within 30 days of confirmation of the consent agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act prohibits agreements between competitors involving price fixing, market division, and collusive tendering.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Section 49D allows the Commission to enter into consent agreements with respondents in respect of prohibited practices, subject to confirmation by the Tribunal.

  3. 03

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Section 58(1)(a)(iii) and 58(1)(b) empower the Tribunal to confirm consent agreements and impose administrative penalties.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd. Faurecia admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(ii) and (iii) of the Competition Act by engaging in market division and collusive tendering with Eberspacher in respect of a Daimler AG tender. The Tribunal found that the consent agreement, including Faurecia's undertakings to cooperate, implement compliance measures, and pay an administrative penalty of R66,885.66, was appropriate and in accordance with the Act. The order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Faurecia in respect of the investigation under case number 2014Nov0688.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal notes the importance of compliance programmes in preventing future contraventions of competition law.
  • The cooperation of respondents in investigations is encouraged and may be considered in determining appropriate penalties.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Proceedings between the Commission and Faurecia concluded.

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Faurecia shall pay an administrative penalty of R66,885.66 to the Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the order.
  • Faurecia shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
  • Faurecia shall circulate a summary of the consent agreement to its employees, managers, and directors within 14 days.
  • Faurecia shall cooperate with the Commission in the prosecution of the remaining respondent.
  • All compliance reports and proof of payment shall be forwarded to the Commission.
  • This order constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission's investigation into Faurecia under case number 2014Nov0688.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2020] ZACT 102

SAFLII Note:Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law andSAFLII Policy

SAFLII Note:

Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and

SAFLII Policy

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC

OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: CO023May20

In the matter between:

The Competition CommissionApplicant

Applicant

Faurecia Emissions ControlRespondent

Respondent

Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Panel

: E Daniels (Presiding Member)

: I Valodia (Tribunal Member)

: T Vilakazi (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 18 May 2020

Decided on : 18 May 2020

CONSENT

AGREEMENT

The Tribunal hereby confirms the consent agreement as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd annexed hereto.

Signed by: Enver Daniels

Signed at: 2020-05-18 13:58:42 +02:00

Reason: I approve this document

Presiding Member

Date

Mr Enver Daniels

18 May 2020

Concurring: Prof. Imraan Valodia and Dr. Thando Vilakazi

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF

SOUTH AFRICA (HELD IN PRETORIA)

CT Case No:

CC Case No: 2014Nov0688

THE

COMPETITION COMMISSION

Applicant

FAURECIA

EMISSIONS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES Respondent

SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD

CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D AS READ WITH SECTIONS 58(1)(a)(iii) and 58(1) (b) OF THECOMPETITION ACT, 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED, BETWEEN

THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND FAURECIA EMISSIONS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD, IN RESPECT

OF CONTRAVENTIONS OF SECTION 4(1)(b) (i), (ii) AND (iii) OF THECOMPETITION ACT, 1998.

COMPETITION ACT, 89 OF 1998

COMPETITION ACT, 1998

Preamble

The Competition Commission and Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd hereby agree that application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms ofsection 49Dread withsection 58(1)(a)(iii)and58(1)(b) of the Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, as amended, in respect of contraventions of section 4(1)(b) (i), (ii) and (iii) of the Act, on the terms set out below.

section 49D

section 58(1)(a)(iii)

1. Definitions

For the purposes of this Consent Agreement, the following definitions shall apply:

1.1"Act"means theCompetition Act, No. 89 of 1998, as amended;

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

1.2"Commission"means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 7[...] M[...] Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;

"Commission"

1.3"Commissioner"means the Commissioner of the Commission, appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act;

"Commissioner"

1.4"Complaint"means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner in terms of section 498(1) of the Act under case number 2014Nov0688;

"Complaint"

1.5"Consent Agreement"means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Faurecia;

"Consent Agreement"

1.6"Eberspacher"means Eberspacher Exhaust Technology GmbH & Co KG, company incorporated under the laws of Germany with its address at E[...] 2[...], 7[...] E[...] a[...] N[...], Germany.

"Eberspacher"

1.7"Faurecia"means Faurecia SE, a company incorporated under the laws of France with its address at 2[...]-2[...] avenue d[...] C[...] P[...], Nanterre, France. Faurecia owns Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd, a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at Ascot Office Park, [...] A[...] Road, 6[...], Port Elizabeth;

"Faurecia"

1.8"Parties"means the Commission and Faurecia;

"Parties"

1.9"Respondents"means Eberspacher and Faurecia;

"Respondents"

1.10"RFQ"means Request for Quotation;

1.11"Tribunal"means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at Mulayo building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 7[...] M[...] Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

"Tribunal"

2. COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION ANO FINDINGS

2.1 On 26 November 2014, the Commissioner initiated a complaint against a number of motor vehicle exhaust system manufacturers, in terms of section 49(8)(1) of the Act for alleged price fixing, market division and collusive tendering in the market for the supply of motor vehicle exhaust systems to Original Equipment Manufacturers worldwide, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i), (ii) and (iii) of the Act.

2.2 The Commission's investigation against Eberspacher and Faurecia revealed the following:

2.2.1 During on or about 2003, Eberspaher and Faurecia had an agreement and/or engaged in a concerted practice to divide markets by allocating specific types of goods and tender collusively in respect of a tender issued by Daimler AG for the manufacture and supply of motor vehicle exhaust systems for the Mercedes Benz C-Class W204 platform.

2.2.2 During on or about 2003, Daimler AG issued a tender for the manufacture and supply of motor vehicle exhaust systems for the Mercedes Benz C-Class W204 platform. Eberspacher and Faurecia were invited to submit bids. Daimler AG required exhaust systems for both gasoline and diesel engines.

2.2.3 The Respondents agreed that, in responding to the RFQ for the W204 platform in 2003, Eberspacher would focus only on the gasoline portions of the RFQ, whileaurecia would focus only on the diesel portions. Ultimately, Faurecia was awarded the diesel (OM646) portion of the RFQ, and Eberspacher was awarded the gasoline (M271 and M272) portions by Daimler AG.

2.2.4 The above conduct contravened section 4(1)(b) (ii) and (iii) of the Act.

3.

ADMISSION

Faurecia admits that it engaged in prohibited practices in contravention of section 4(1)(b) (ii) and (iii) of the Act in relation to the conduct described in paragraph 2 above.

4. CO-OPERATION

4.1 Faurecia agrees to fully cooperate with the Commission in its prosecution of the remaining respondent in the Commission's complaint referral. This cooperation includes, but is not limited to:

4.1.1 To the extent that it is in existence, the provision of evidence, written or otherwise, which is in the possession of Faurecia or under Faurecia's control, concerning the alleged prohibited practices set out in this Consent Agreement.

4.1.2 Testifying during the hearing of the complaint referral, in respect of the prohibited practices set out in this Consent Agreement.

5.

FUTURE CONDUCT

Faurecia agrees to:

5.1 prepare and circulate a statement summarizing the contents of this Consent Agreement to its employees, managers and directors within fourteen (14) days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal;

5.2 refrain from engaging in conduct in contravention of section 4 (1)(b) of the Act in future;

5.3 develop, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that its employees, management, directors and agents do not engage in future contraventions of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme should include mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring of any contravention of the Act;

5.4 submit a copy of such compliance programme to the Commission within sixty (60) days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order by the Tribunal; and

5.5 undertakes henceforth to engage in competitive practices.

6.

ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY

6.1 Faurecia agrees and undertakes to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R66 885, 66 (Sixty-six thousand eight hundred and eighty five rands and sixty six cents). This amount does not exceed 10% of Faurecia's turnover in the Republic of South Africa for the financial year ended February 2013.

Sixty-six thousand eight hundred and eighty five rands and sixty six cents

6.2 Faurecia shall pay the full amount of the administrative penalty, being R66 885, 66 (Sixty-six thousand eight hundred and eighty-five rands and sixty cents) to the Commission within 30 days of the confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

Sixty-six thousand eight hundred and eighty-five rands and sixty cents

6.3 The administrative penalty must be paid into the Commission's bank account which is as follows:

Name: The Competition Commission Bank: Absa Bank, Pretoria

Account Number: 4[...]

Branch Code: 6[...]

Ref: 2[...]

6.4 The administrative penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with the provisions of section 59(4) of the Act.

7.

COMPLIANCE

All compliance reports and proof of payments relating to this matter shall be forwarded to the Commission at C[...].

8.

FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT

This agreement, upon confirmation as an order of the Tribunal, is entered into in full and final settlement in respect of the Commission's

investigation into the activities of Faurecia under case no. 2014Nov0688 and concludes all proceedings between the Commission and

Faurecia.

Dated and signed atCape Townon the10day ofApril 2020.

Dated and signed at

on the

day of

ForFaurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Name in Full: Sabine Reoule

Position: Country CFO

Dated and signed at on the day of 2020.

For theCommission

Commission

Tembinkosi Bonakele

Commissioner

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.