Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd (CR143Nov14/SA241Jan19) [2019] ZACT 8 (6 February 2019)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd admitted to engaging in collusive tendering, price fixing, and market division in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act. The respondent cooperated with the Commission, ceased the prohibited conduct, and undertook to implement compliance measures. The administrative penalty of R4,000,000, less than 10% of annual turnover, was deemed appropriate. The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement as an order, concluding all proceedings between the parties regarding the investigated conduct.

Court disposition

The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal, concluding all proceedings related to the investigated conduct.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement annexed as 'A' is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R4,000,000 to the Competition Commission in two instalments: R1,200,000 within 30 days and R2,800,000 on the anniversary of the confirmation date.
  • GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 90 days.
  • GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd shall circulate a summary of the settlement agreement to its managers and directors within 30 days.
  • All compliance reports and proof of payments shall be forwarded to the Commission.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant Counsel: Tembinkosi Bonakele

GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Geoffrey David Irons

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty Total: ZAR 4,000,000
  • First Instalment: ZAR 1,200,000
  • Second Instalment: ZAR 2,800,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd, together with Giuricich Brothers (Pty) Ltd, engaged in collusive tendering, price fixing, and market division in the construction industry, specifically relating to the BATSA Project. The Commission's investigation revealed that GD Irons received a cover price from Giuricich and was paid a losers fee, constituting a contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act. The Commission submitted that the settlement agreement, including the administrative penalty and undertakings for future compliance, should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
Respondent
GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd admitted to the conduct described by the Commission, acknowledged the contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act, and agreed to pay an administrative penalty of R4,000,000. GD Irons undertook to implement a competition law compliance programme, circulate the settlement agreement to its management, and submit compliance reports to the Commission. The respondent requested confirmation of the settlement agreement as a full and final settlement of all proceedings related to the conduct investigated.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, section 4(1)(b)

    Engaging in collusive tendering, price fixing, and market division constitutes a prohibited practice under section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act.

  2. 02

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, sections 490 and 58(1)(b)

    The Tribunal may confirm a consent agreement as an order under section 490 read with section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act.

  3. 03

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, sections 58(1)(a)(iii), 59(1)(a), 59(2), 59(3)

    An administrative penalty may be imposed for contraventions of section 4(1)(b), subject to the limitations in section 59.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd admitted to engaging in collusive tendering, price fixing, and market division in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act. The respondent cooperated with the Commission, ceased the prohibited conduct, and undertook to implement compliance measures. The administrative penalty of R4,000,000, less than 10% of annual turnover, was deemed appropriate. The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement as an order, concluding all proceedings between the parties regarding the investigated conduct.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal notes the importance of effective compliance programmes in preventing future contraventions of competition law.
  • The cooperation of GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd with the Commission is acknowledged and encouraged as a model for future settlements.

Court disposition

The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal, concluding all proceedings related to the investigated conduct.

  • The settlement agreement annexed as 'A' is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R4,000,000 to the Competition Commission in two instalments: R1,200,000 within 30 days and R2,800,000 on the anniversary of the confirmation date.
  • GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 90 days.
  • GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd shall circulate a summary of the settlement agreement to its managers and directors within 30 days.
  • All compliance reports and proof of payments shall be forwarded to the Commission.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2019] ZACT 8

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC

OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: CR143Nov14/SA241Jan19

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission

Applicant

And

GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Panel: Y Carrim (Presiding Member)

M Mazwai (Tribunal Member)

I Valodia (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 06 February 2019

Decided on: 06 February 2019

Settlement Agreement

The Tribunal hereby confirms the settlement agreement as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd annexed hereto marked "A".

Presiding Member Ms Yasmin Carrim

06 February 2019 Date

Concurring: Ms Mondo Mazwai and Prof. lmraan Valodia

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

(HELD IN PRETORIA)

CT CASE NO: CR143Nov14/020149 CC

CASE NO: 2009Sep4641

THE

COMPETITION

COMMISSION

Applicant

and

GD IRONS CONSTRUCTION (PTY)

LTD

Respondent

CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 490 READ WITH SECTION 58(1)(b) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND GD IRONS CONSTRUCTION (PTY) LTD, IN RESPECT OF A CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4(1)(b) (i) (ii) and (iii) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998

Preamble

The Competition Commission and GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 490 read with section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended, in respect of a contravention of section 4(1)(b) (i) (ii) and (iii).

1.

DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this consent agreement, the following definitions shall apply:

1.1 "Act" means the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended;

1.2 "BEE Company" means a company which meet the criteria set out in the Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 53 of 2003 and the codes of good practice thereunder;

1.3 "BATSA" means the British American Tobacco South Africa, a public company duly registered in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at Waterway House South, No 3 Dock Road, V&A Waterfront, Cape Town;

1.4 "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside. Pretoria, Gauteng;

1.5 "Consent Agreement" means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and GD Irons;

1.6 "CLP" means the Commission's Corporate Leniency Policy (Government Notice No. 628 of 23 May 2008, published in Government Gazette No.31064 of 23 May 2008);

1.7 "GD Irons" means GD Irons Construction (Pty) Ltd, a private company duly registered in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at 430 Skilder Street, Silvertondale, Pretoria, 0127;

1.8 "Giuricich" means Giuricich Brothers (Pty) Ltd, a private company duly registered in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at Cedarwood Office Park, Mount Lebanon Road, Off Western Service Road, Woodmead, Sandton;

1.9 "Parties" means the Commission and GD Irons collectively;

1.10 "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjles Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

2. THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS

2.1 On 01 September 2009, the Commissioner initiated a complaint against firms in the construction industry for collusive practices in

construction industry as regards price fixing, market division and collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1)(b) (i), (ii) and (iii) of the Act GD Irons and Giuricich are part of the respondents in this complaint

2.2 The Commission's investigation under Case No. 2009Sept4641 revealed that around November 2006 GD Irons entered into an agreement

with Guiricich to tender collusively. More specifically the investigation found that during November 2006, Giuricich provided a

cover price to GD Irons in respect of a tender issued in relation to the construction of a new distribution depot for British American

Tobacco South Africa ("BATSA Project") and, in return, during or about September 2007 Giuricich paid GD Irons a losers fee.

2.3 The Commission submits that this conduct is in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i), (ii) and (iii) of the Act.

3.

ADMISSION

GD Irons admits that it engaged in the conduct set out in clause 2 above in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i)(ii) and (iii) of the Act.

4. CO-OPERATION

Insofar as the Commission is aware, GD Irons:

4.1 has provided the Commission with truthful and timely disclosure, including information in its possession or under its control, relating to the prohibited practice:

4.2 has ceased engaging in the prohibited conduct set out in clause 2 above;

4.3 has not destroyed, falsified or concealed information, evidence and documents relating to the prohibited practice; and

4.4 has not misrepresented or made a wilful or negligent misrepresentation concerning the material fc1cts of any prohibited practice or otherwise acted dishonestly.

5.

FUTURE CONDUCT

GD Iron agrees and undertakes to:

5.1 refrain from engaging in conduct in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Act, and from engaging in any prohibited practice in future;

5.2 circulate a statement summarising the contents of this Consent Agreement to its managers and directors within 30 days (thirty) from the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement by the Tribunal;

5.3 to implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme. Such programme shall incorporate corporate governance designed to ensure the employees, management, directors and agents do not engage in future contraventions of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme will include mechanisms for the monitoring and detection of any contraventions of the Act;

5.4 as regards the competition law compliance programme referred to above, GD Irons undertakes to submit to the Commission a copy thereof within 90 days of confirmation of the Settlement Agreement as an Order of the Tribunal.

6.

ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY

6.1. Having regard to the provision of section 58(1)(a)(iii) as read with section 59(1)(a), 59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, GD Irons is Hable to pay an administrative penalty.

6.2. GD Irons agrees and undertakes to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R4 000 000 (Four Million Rand). This arnount is less than 10% of GD Iron's annual turnover in the Republic of South Africa for the financial year ended 2013.

6.3. GD Irons shall pay the abovementioned amount to the Commission in 2 (two) instalments. The first instalment equal to 30% of the administrative penalty in the amount of R1 200 000 (one million two hundred thousand rand) shall be paid within 30 days from the date of confirmation of this consent agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

6.4. The remaining instalment equal to 70% of the administrative penalty in the amount of R2 800 000 (two million eight hundred thousand rand) shall be paid in full on the anniversary of the confirmation date of this consent agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

6.5. GD Irons, in its current ownership and its current shareholders, are jointly and severally liable for payment of the administrative penalty.

6.6. The administrative penalty shall be paid into the Commission's bank account, details of which are as follows:

Bank name: Absa Bank

Branch name: Pretoria

Account holder: Competition Commission Fees Account

Account number: […]

Account type: Branch Code: Reference:

Current Account 632005

Case Number: 2009Sep4641/GD Irons

6.7. The penalty will then be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

7.

COMPLIANCE

7.1. All compliance reports and proof of payments relating to this matter shall be forwarded to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za;

8.

FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT

This Consent Agreement is entered into in full and final settlement of the Commission's investigation under Case No. 2009Sep4641 and upon confirmation as an order of the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and GD Irons relating to the conduct that is the subject of the Commission's investigation under Case No. 2009Sep4641, including the complaint referral under Competition Tribunal Case No. CR143Nov14/020149.

FOR GD IRONS CONSTRUCTION (PTY) LTD

Dated and signed at Pretoria on the 27th day of November 2018

_____

Full names: Geoffrey David Irons

Designation: Chief Executive Officer

FOR THE COMMISSION

Dated and signed at PRETORIA on the 19th day of December 2018

______

TEMBINKOSI

BONAKELE

Commissioner

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 53 of 2003

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.