Competition Commission v K.F Computers CC (CR010Apr19; SA134Dec21) [2021] ZACT 105 (8 December 2021)
- Citation
- [2021] ZACT 105
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, E Daniels, I Valodia
- Case number
- CR010Apr19/SA134Dec21
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, E Daniels, I Valodia
- Case number
- CR010Apr19/SA134Dec21
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC as an order. The Tribunal accepted the Commission’s findings that the conduct in question amounted to collusive tendering, but noted that K.F Computers CC did not admit liability. The Tribunal considered the respondent’s small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions as mitigating factors. The administrative penalty of R32,135 was found to be appropriate and within the statutory limit. The Tribunal further noted the undertakings by K.F Computers CC to implement a compliance programme and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct. The confirmation of the consent agreement concluded all proceedings between the parties relating to the conduct investigated.
Court disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; all proceedings between the parties relating to the investigated conduct concluded.
Orders
- The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- K.F Computers CC shall pay an administrative penalty of R32,135 to the Competition Commission in two equal monthly instalments.
- K.F Computers CC shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit proof thereof to the Commission within 60 calendar days.
- K.F Computers CC shall circulate a summary of the consent agreement to all its members and board of directors within 60 business days.
- All reports and proof of payment shall be submitted to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
- This consent agreement constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission’s investigation under case number 2016MAR0077.
02
Material facts
Parties
Competition Commission
ApplicantK.F Computers CC
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Administrative Penalty: ZAR 32,135
03
Procedural history
Posture
Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the conduct of K.F Computers CC and SAAB Grintek Defense (Pty) Ltd amounted to collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act.
- 02
Whether the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- 03
Whether the administrative penalty imposed is appropriate given the circumstances.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Competition Commission argued that its investigation found evidence of collusive tendering between K.F Computers CC and SAAB Grintek Defense (Pty) Ltd in relation to the SITA Tender for the South African Air Force’s Ground Command Control System and Current Intelligence System. The Commission submitted that SAAB assisted K.F Computers in completing its tender documents and intentionally priced its own tender higher to ensure K.F Computers would win. The Commission sought confirmation of the consent agreement, which included an administrative penalty and undertakings regarding future compliance.
- Respondent
- K.F Computers CC did not admit liability for contravening section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The respondent agreed to enter into the consent agreement without admission of liability, citing its small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions. K.F Computers CC undertook to cooperate fully, implement a competition law compliance programme, and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, section 4(1)(b)(iii)
Collusive tendering is prohibited under section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act, which forbids firms from engaging in practices that involve direct or indirect fixing of tender prices or manipulating tender outcomes.
- 02
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, sections 49D and 58(1)(b)
The Tribunal may confirm a consent agreement as an order in terms of section 49D read with section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act.
- 03
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, section 59(2)
An administrative penalty imposed for contravention of the Act must not exceed 10% of the firm’s annual turnover for the relevant financial year.
- 04
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998
The Commission may enter into a consent agreement without admission of liability, taking into account factors such as the size of the firm, the value of the tender, and prior conduct.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC as an order. The Tribunal accepted the Commission’s findings that the conduct in question amounted to collusive tendering, but noted that K.F Computers CC did not admit liability. The Tribunal considered the respondent’s small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions as mitigating factors. The administrative penalty of R32,135 was found to be appropriate and within the statutory limit. The Tribunal further noted the undertakings by K.F Computers CC to implement a compliance programme and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct. The confirmation of the consent agreement concluded all proceedings between the parties relating to the conduct investigated.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal encourages small firms to proactively implement competition law compliance programmes to prevent future contraventions.
- The Commission’s willingness to settle without admission of liability reflects a pragmatic approach to enforcement where the value of the tender and the size of the firm do not justify protracted litigation.
- The administrative penalty imposed serves as a deterrent while taking into account the respondent’s circumstances.
Court disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; all proceedings between the parties relating to the investigated conduct concluded.
- The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- K.F Computers CC shall pay an administrative penalty of R32,135 to the Competition Commission in two equal monthly instalments.
- K.F Computers CC shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit proof thereof to the Commission within 60 calendar days.
- K.F Computers CC shall circulate a summary of the consent agreement to all its members and board of directors within 60 business days.
- All reports and proof of payment shall be submitted to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
- This consent agreement constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission’s investigation under case number 2016MAR0077.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Order
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: CR010Apr19/SA134Dec21
In the matter between:
The Competition Commission Applicant
And
K.F Computers CC Respondent
Panel: Y Carrim (Presiding Member)
E Daniels (Tribunal Member)
I Valodia (Tribunal Member)
Heard on: 08 December 2021
Decided on: 08 December 2021
Settlement Agreement
The Tribunal hereby confirms the settlement agreement as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission And K.F Computers CC annexed hereto.
Presiding Member Ms Yasmin Carrim
Concurring: Mr Enver Daniels and Mr Imraan Valodia
Date: 08 December 2021
IN
THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
CT CASE NO: CR010APR19 CC
CASE NO: 2016MAR0077
COMPETITION
COMMISSION OF SA Applicant
K.F
COMPUTERS CC
Respondent
CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D READ WITH SECTION 58(1) (b) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND K.F COMPUTERS CC, IN RESPECT OF A CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4(1)(b)(iii) OF THE COMPETITION ACT 89 OF 1998
Preamble
The Competition Commission (“Commission”) and K.F Computers CC (“K.F Computers”) hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 49D read with section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act no. 89 of 1998, as amended (“the Act”), in respect of a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act.
1.
DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this consent agreement the following definitions shall apply
1.1. “Act” means the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended.
1.2. “K.F Computers CC” means a close corporation duly registered in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its registered place of business situated at 23 Le Mistral, Woodburn Road, Morningside, Sandton.
1.3. “SAAB Grintek Defense (Pty) Ltd” means a private company duly registered and incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at No. 1 Shelanti Avenue, Lyttelton Office Park, Sandton.
1.4. “Commission” means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.
1.5. “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of the Competition Commission (the Commissioner) in terms of section 24(1) of the Act.
1.6. “Consent Agreement” means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and K.F Computers.
1.7. “State Information Technology Agency” means a state-owned company duly registered in terms of the South African Company Laws, with its principal place of business at 459 Tsitsa Street, Erasmuskloof, Pretoria.
1.8. “SITA Tender” means tender issued by the State Information Technology Agency under tender number: RFB1366/2015 for the provision of services in support of the South African Air Force’s Ground Command Control System and the Current Intelligence System.
1.9. “Parties” means the Commission and K.F Computers.
1.10. “Tribunal” means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at the 1st Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.
2. COMMISSION’S INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS
2.1. On 4 March 2016, the Commission received a complaint from the State Information Technology Agency (“SITA”) in terms of section 49B(2)(b) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended (“the Act”). The SITA alleged that K.F Computers and SAAB colluded when tendering for the Ground Command and Control System (“GCCS”) and the Current Intelligence System (“CURIS”) Tender.
2.2. The SITA Tender was for the provision of services in support of the South African Air Force’s (“SAAF”) GCCS and CURIS.
2.3. This complaint was investigated under case number 2016MAR0077.
2.4. The Commission’s investigation found that on or about January 2016, SAAB assisted K.F Computers in completing its tender documents and in turn SAAB’s pricing for the tender was higher than K.F Computers in order to ensure that K.F Computers wins the tender.
2.5. The conduct between K.F Computers and SAAB amounts to collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act.
3.
ADMISSION
3.1. K.F Computers does not admit that it has acted in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act as described in paragraph 2 above.
3.2. The Commission has agreed to enter into the Consent Agreement without admission of liability with K.F Computers based on the following factors:
3.2.1 K.F Computers is a small firm;
3.2.2 Given the small size of K.F Computers as well as the small size of the tender, the Commission does not consider it worthy to engage in protracted and costly litigation with K.F Computers;
3.2.3 K.F Computers has never contravened the Act before.
4. CO-OPERATION
4.1. K.F Computers has provided full and expeditious co-operation to the Commission concerning the prohibited practice.
5.
AGREEMENT REGARDING FUTURE CONDUCT
5.1. K.F Computers undertakes to refrain from engaging in any anti-competitive conduct in contravention of the Act in future.
5.2. K.F Computers will develop, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that all its members and board of directors do not engage in future contraventions of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme will include mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring and detection of any contraventions of the Act.
5.3. K.F Computers shall circulate a statement summarising the contents of this Consent Agreement to all its members and board of directors within 60 (sixty) business days from the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement by the
6.
ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY
6.1. K.F Computers agrees that it is liable to pay an administrative penalty of R32 135 (Thirty-Two Thousand, One Hundred and Thirty-Five Rand). This amount does not exceed 10% of K.F Computer’s annual turnover for the financial year ending February 2016
6.2. K.F Computers will pay R32 135 (Thirty-Two Thousand, One Hundred and Thirty-Five Rand) to the Commission in two (2) equal monthly instalments after the confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.
6.3. The payment shall be made into the Commission’s bank account, details of which are as follows:
Bank name: [….]
Branch name: [….]
Account holder: [….]
Account number: [….]
Account type: [….]
Branch Code: [….]
Reference: [….]
6.4. The penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.
7.
MONITORING
7.1. K.F Computers undertakes to submit a copy of the compliance programme referred to in clause 5.2 to the Commission within 60 calendar days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order to the Tribunal.
7.2. All reports in relation to conditions set out in this agreement, including but not limited to compliance programmes, proof of payment(s) etc, shall be submitted to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
8.
FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT
8.1. This Consent Agreement is entered into in full and final settlement of the Commission’s investigation under case number: 2016MAR0077 and upon confirmation as an order of the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and K.F Computers relating to the conduct that is the subject of the Commission’s investigation under case number: 2016MAR0077.
Tembinkosi Bonakele
Commissioner
Dated and signed at PRETORIA on the 03 Day of December 2021
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.