Competition Commission v K.F Computers CC (CR010Apr19; SA134Dec21) [2021] ZACT 105 (8 December 2021)
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC as an order. The Tribunal accepted the Commission’s findings that the conduct in question amounted to collusive tendering, but noted that K.F Computers CC did not admit liability. The Tribunal considered the respondent’s small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions as mitigating factors. The administrative penalty of R32,135 was found to be appropriate and within the statutory limit. The Tribunal further noted the undertakings by K.F Computers CC to implement a compliance programme and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct. The confirmation of...
- Citation
- [2021] ZACT 105
- Parties
- Applicant: Competition Commission; Respondent: K.F Computers CC
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 2021
- Case Number
- CR010Apr19/SA134Dec21
- Procedural Posture
- Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation
- Outcome
- Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; all proceedings between the parties relating to the investigated conduct concluded.
- Judges
- Y Carrim, E Daniels, I Valodia
- Legal Topics
- Collusive Tendering, Administrative Penalty, Consent Agreement, Section 4 1 B Iii, Compliance Programme
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Competition Commission
Applicant
K.F Computers CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conduct of K.F Computers CC and SAAB Grintek Defense (Pty) Ltd amounted to collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act.
- 2 Whether the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- 3 Whether the administrative penalty imposed is appropriate given the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC as an order. The Tribunal accepted the Commission’s findings that the conduct in question amounted to collusive tendering, but noted that K.F Computers CC did not admit liability. The Tribunal considered the respondent’s small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions as mitigating factors. The administrative penalty of R32,135 was found to be appropriate and within the statutory limit. The Tribunal further noted the undertakings by K.F Computers CC to implement a compliance programme and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct. The confirmation of...
Court Disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; all proceedings between the parties relating to the investigated conduct concluded.
Orders
- The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- K.F Computers CC shall pay an administrative penalty of R32,135 to the Competition Commission in two equal monthly instalments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment