Competition Commission v K.F Computers CC (CR010Apr19; SA134Dec21) [2021] ZACT 105 (8 December 2021)

Competition Commission v K.F Computers CC (CR010Apr19; SA134Dec21) [2021] ZACT 105 (8 December 2021)

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC as an order. The Tribunal accepted the Commission’s findings that the conduct in question amounted to collusive tendering, but noted that K.F Computers CC did not admit liability. The Tribunal considered the respondent’s small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions as mitigating factors. The administrative penalty of R32,135 was found to be appropriate and within the statutory limit. The Tribunal further noted the undertakings by K.F Computers CC to implement a compliance programme and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct. The confirmation of...

Citation
[2021] ZACT 105
Parties
Applicant: Competition Commission; Respondent: K.F Computers CC
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
8 December 2021
Case Number
CR010Apr19/SA134Dec21
Procedural Posture
Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation
Outcome
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; all proceedings between the parties relating to the investigated conduct concluded.
Judges
Y Carrim, E Daniels, I Valodia
Legal Topics
Collusive Tendering, Administrative Penalty, Consent Agreement, Section 4 1 B Iii, Compliance Programme

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant

K.F Computers CC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation

  1. 1 Whether the conduct of K.F Computers CC and SAAB Grintek Defense (Pty) Ltd amounted to collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act.
  2. 2 Whether the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  3. 3 Whether the administrative penalty imposed is appropriate given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC as an order. The Tribunal accepted the Commission’s findings that the conduct in question amounted to collusive tendering, but noted that K.F Computers CC did not admit liability. The Tribunal considered the respondent’s small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions as mitigating factors. The administrative penalty of R32,135 was found to be appropriate and within the statutory limit. The Tribunal further noted the undertakings by K.F Computers CC to implement a compliance programme and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct. The confirmation of...

Court Disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; all proceedings between the parties relating to the investigated conduct concluded.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • K.F Computers CC shall pay an administrative penalty of R32,135 to the Competition Commission in two equal monthly instalments.