Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v K.F Computers CC (CR010Apr19; SA134Dec21) [2021] ZACT 105 (8 December 2021)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC as an order. The Tribunal accepted the Commission’s findings that the conduct in question amounted to collusive tendering, but noted that K.F Computers CC did not admit liability. The Tribunal considered the respondent’s small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions as mitigating factors. The administrative penalty of R32,135 was found to be appropriate and within the statutory limit. The Tribunal further noted the undertakings by K.F Computers CC to implement a compliance programme and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct. The confirmation of the consent agreement concluded all proceedings between the parties relating to the conduct investigated.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; all proceedings between the parties relating to the investigated conduct concluded.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • K.F Computers CC shall pay an administrative penalty of R32,135 to the Competition Commission in two equal monthly instalments.
  • K.F Computers CC shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit proof thereof to the Commission within 60 calendar days.
  • K.F Computers CC shall circulate a summary of the consent agreement to all its members and board of directors within 60 business days.
  • All reports and proof of payment shall be submitted to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
  • This consent agreement constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission’s investigation under case number 2016MAR0077.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant

K.F Computers CC

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 32,135

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that its investigation found evidence of collusive tendering between K.F Computers CC and SAAB Grintek Defense (Pty) Ltd in relation to the SITA Tender for the South African Air Force’s Ground Command Control System and Current Intelligence System. The Commission submitted that SAAB assisted K.F Computers in completing its tender documents and intentionally priced its own tender higher to ensure K.F Computers would win. The Commission sought confirmation of the consent agreement, which included an administrative penalty and undertakings regarding future compliance.
Respondent
K.F Computers CC did not admit liability for contravening section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The respondent agreed to enter into the consent agreement without admission of liability, citing its small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions. K.F Computers CC undertook to cooperate fully, implement a competition law compliance programme, and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, section 4(1)(b)(iii)

    Collusive tendering is prohibited under section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act, which forbids firms from engaging in practices that involve direct or indirect fixing of tender prices or manipulating tender outcomes.

  2. 02

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, sections 49D and 58(1)(b)

    The Tribunal may confirm a consent agreement as an order in terms of section 49D read with section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act.

  3. 03

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, section 59(2)

    An administrative penalty imposed for contravention of the Act must not exceed 10% of the firm’s annual turnover for the relevant financial year.

  4. 04

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

    The Commission may enter into a consent agreement without admission of liability, taking into account factors such as the size of the firm, the value of the tender, and prior conduct.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC as an order. The Tribunal accepted the Commission’s findings that the conduct in question amounted to collusive tendering, but noted that K.F Computers CC did not admit liability. The Tribunal considered the respondent’s small size, the limited value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions as mitigating factors. The administrative penalty of R32,135 was found to be appropriate and within the statutory limit. The Tribunal further noted the undertakings by K.F Computers CC to implement a compliance programme and refrain from future anti-competitive conduct. The confirmation of the consent agreement concluded all proceedings between the parties relating to the conduct investigated.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal encourages small firms to proactively implement competition law compliance programmes to prevent future contraventions.
  • The Commission’s willingness to settle without admission of liability reflects a pragmatic approach to enforcement where the value of the tender and the size of the firm do not justify protracted litigation.
  • The administrative penalty imposed serves as a deterrent while taking into account the respondent’s circumstances.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; all proceedings between the parties relating to the investigated conduct concluded.

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and K.F Computers CC is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • K.F Computers CC shall pay an administrative penalty of R32,135 to the Competition Commission in two equal monthly instalments.
  • K.F Computers CC shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit proof thereof to the Commission within 60 calendar days.
  • K.F Computers CC shall circulate a summary of the consent agreement to all its members and board of directors within 60 business days.
  • All reports and proof of payment shall be submitted to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
  • This consent agreement constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission’s investigation under case number 2016MAR0077.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2021] ZACT 105

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: CR010Apr19/SA134Dec21

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission Applicant

And

K.F Computers CC Respondent

Panel: Y Carrim (Presiding Member)

E Daniels (Tribunal Member)

I Valodia (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 08 December 2021

Decided on: 08 December 2021

Settlement Agreement

The Tribunal hereby confirms the settlement agreement as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission And K.F Computers CC annexed hereto.

Presiding Member Ms Yasmin Carrim

Concurring: Mr Enver Daniels and Mr Imraan Valodia

Date: 08 December 2021

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

CT CASE NO: CR010APR19 CC

CASE NO: 2016MAR0077

COMPETITION

COMMISSION OF SA Applicant

K.F

COMPUTERS CC

Respondent

CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D READ WITH SECTION 58(1) (b) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND K.F COMPUTERS CC, IN RESPECT OF A CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4(1)(b)(iii) OF THE COMPETITION ACT 89 OF 1998

Preamble

The Competition Commission (“Commission”) and K.F Computers CC (“K.F Computers”) hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 49D read with section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act no. 89 of 1998, as amended (“the Act”), in respect of a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act.

1.

DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this consent agreement the following definitions shall apply

1.1. “Act” means the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended.

1.2. “K.F Computers CC” means a close corporation duly registered in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its registered place of business situated at 23 Le Mistral, Woodburn Road, Morningside, Sandton.

1.3. “SAAB Grintek Defense (Pty) Ltd” means a private company duly registered and incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at No. 1 Shelanti Avenue, Lyttelton Office Park, Sandton.

1.4. “Commission” means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

1.5. “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of the Competition Commission (the Commissioner) in terms of section 24(1) of the Act.

1.6. “Consent Agreement” means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and K.F Computers.

1.7. “State Information Technology Agency” means a state-owned company duly registered in terms of the South African Company Laws, with its principal place of business at 459 Tsitsa Street, Erasmuskloof, Pretoria.

1.8. “SITA Tender” means tender issued by the State Information Technology Agency under tender number: RFB1366/2015 for the provision of services in support of the South African Air Force’s Ground Command Control System and the Current Intelligence System.

1.9. “Parties” means the Commission and K.F Computers.

1.10. “Tribunal” means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at the 1st Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

2. COMMISSION’S INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS

2.1. On 4 March 2016, the Commission received a complaint from the State Information Technology Agency (“SITA”) in terms of section 49B(2)(b) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended (“the Act”). The SITA alleged that K.F Computers and SAAB colluded when tendering for the Ground Command and Control System (“GCCS”) and the Current Intelligence System (“CURIS”) Tender.

2.2. The SITA Tender was for the provision of services in support of the South African Air Force’s (“SAAF”) GCCS and CURIS.

2.3. This complaint was investigated under case number 2016MAR0077.

2.4. The Commission’s investigation found that on or about January 2016, SAAB assisted K.F Computers in completing its tender documents and in turn SAAB’s pricing for the tender was higher than K.F Computers in order to ensure that K.F Computers wins the tender.

2.5. The conduct between K.F Computers and SAAB amounts to collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act.

3.

ADMISSION

3.1. K.F Computers does not admit that it has acted in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act as described in paragraph 2 above.

3.2. The Commission has agreed to enter into the Consent Agreement without admission of liability with K.F Computers based on the following factors:

3.2.1 K.F Computers is a small firm;

3.2.2 Given the small size of K.F Computers as well as the small size of the tender, the Commission does not consider it worthy to engage in protracted and costly litigation with K.F Computers;

3.2.3 K.F Computers has never contravened the Act before.

4. CO-OPERATION

4.1. K.F Computers has provided full and expeditious co-operation to the Commission concerning the prohibited practice.

5.

AGREEMENT REGARDING FUTURE CONDUCT

5.1. K.F Computers undertakes to refrain from engaging in any anti-competitive conduct in contravention of the Act in future.

5.2. K.F Computers will develop, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that all its members and board of directors do not engage in future contraventions of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme will include mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring and detection of any contraventions of the Act.

5.3. K.F Computers shall circulate a statement summarising the contents of this Consent Agreement to all its members and board of directors within 60 (sixty) business days from the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement by the

6.

ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY

6.1. K.F Computers agrees that it is liable to pay an administrative penalty of R32 135 (Thirty-Two Thousand, One Hundred and Thirty-Five Rand). This amount does not exceed 10% of K.F Computer’s annual turnover for the financial year ending February 2016

6.2. K.F Computers will pay R32 135 (Thirty-Two Thousand, One Hundred and Thirty-Five Rand) to the Commission in two (2) equal monthly instalments after the confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

6.3. The payment shall be made into the Commission’s bank account, details of which are as follows:

Bank name: [….]

Branch name: [….]

Account holder: [….]

Account number: [….]

Account type: [….]

Branch Code: [….]

Reference: [….]

6.4. The penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

7.

MONITORING

7.1. K.F Computers undertakes to submit a copy of the compliance programme referred to in clause 5.2 to the Commission within 60 calendar days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order to the Tribunal.

7.2. All reports in relation to conditions set out in this agreement, including but not limited to compliance programmes, proof of payment(s) etc, shall be submitted to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.

8.

FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT

8.1. This Consent Agreement is entered into in full and final settlement of the Commission’s investigation under case number: 2016MAR0077 and upon confirmation as an order of the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and K.F Computers relating to the conduct that is the subject of the Commission’s investigation under case number: 2016MAR0077.

Tembinkosi Bonakele

Commissioner

Dated and signed at PRETORIA on the 03 Day of December 2021

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.