Competition Commission v Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd (CR087Mar10/SA253Feb19) [2019] ZACT 19 (13 March 2019)
- Citation
- [2019] ZACT 19
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, A Ndoni, I Valodia
- Case number
- CR087Mar10/SA253Feb19
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, A Ndoni, I Valodia
- Case number
- CR087Mar10/SA253Feb19
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd admitted to participating in price fixing arrangements with other maize millers between 1999 and 2006, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The Tribunal found that the settlement agreement, which included admissions of liability, undertakings for future compliance, and payment of an administrative penalty, was consistent with the requirements of the Act. The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd in respect of the conduct described in the complaint.
Court disposition
Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed and undertakings for future compliance accepted.
Orders
- The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty in the total amount of R1,320,819.00, with half payable within 10 days and the balance in 12 equal instalments.
- Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
- Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd shall cooperate with the Commission in the prosecution of remaining respondents.
02
Material facts
Parties
Competition Commission
ApplicantParamount Mills (Pty) Ltd
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Administrative Penalty Total: ZAR 1,320,819
- First Instalment: ZAR 660,409.56
- Monthly Instalment: ZAR 55,034.12
03
Procedural history
Posture
Settlement Application / Order Confirming Settlement Agreement
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Did Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd contravene section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act by engaging in price fixing of milled white maize products?
- 02
Is the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd compliant with the requirements of the Competition Act?
- 03
Is Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd liable for an administrative penalty under section 59 of the Competition Act?
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Competition Commission argued that Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd, along with other maize millers, participated in meetings and telephone discussions between 1999 and 2007 to fix prices, create uniform price lists, and coordinate the timing of price increases for milled white maize products. The Commission submitted that this conduct contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act and warranted the imposition of an administrative penalty. The Commission sought confirmation of the settlement agreement, which included admissions of liability and undertakings for future compliance.
- Respondent
- Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act by participating in price fixing and exchanging pricing information with competitors between 1999 and 2006. Paramount agreed to cooperate with the Commission in prosecuting other respondents, to implement a competition law compliance programme, and to pay an administrative penalty as set out in the settlement agreement. Paramount asserted that the conduct had ceased and that its current majority shareholder, Paramount Holdings Limited, was not involved in the collusive conduct.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act 89 of 1998
Section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act prohibits agreements between competitors to directly or indirectly fix prices or trading conditions.
- 02
Competition Act 89 of 1998
Section 59(1)(a) of the Competition Act empowers the Tribunal to impose administrative penalties for prohibited practices.
- 03
Competition Act 89 of 1998
Settlement agreements may be confirmed as orders of the Tribunal under section 27(1)(d) of the Competition Act.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd admitted to participating in price fixing arrangements with other maize millers between 1999 and 2006, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The Tribunal found that the settlement agreement, which included admissions of liability, undertakings for future compliance, and payment of an administrative penalty, was consistent with the requirements of the Act. The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd in respect of the conduct described in the complaint.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal notes that Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd has undertaken to implement a competition law compliance programme to prevent future contraventions.
- The settlement agreement is entered into in full and final settlement of the complaint and concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd regarding the conduct in question.
Court disposition
Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed and undertakings for future compliance accepted.
- The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty in the total amount of R1,320,819.00, with half payable within 10 days and the balance in 12 equal instalments.
- Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
- Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd shall cooperate with the Commission in the prosecution of remaining respondents.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Order
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL
REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: CR087Mar10/SA253Feb19
In the matter between:
The Competition Commission
Applicant
And
Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Panel: Y Carrim (Presiding Member)
A Ndoni (Tribunal Member)
I Valodia (Tribunal Member)
Heard on: 13 March 2019
Decided on: 13 March 2019
Settlement Agreement
The Tribunal hereby confirms the settlement agreement as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd annexed hereto marked "A".
_____
Presiding Member
Ms Yasmin Carrim
13 March 2019
Date
Concurring: Ms Andiswa Ndoni and Prof. lmraan Valodia
IN
THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
(HELD IN PRETORIA)
CC Case No: 2007Mar2844
CT Case No: CR087Mar10/SA253Feb19
In the matter between
THE
COMPETITION
COMMISSION
Applicant
PARAMOUNT MILLS (PTY)
LTD
Respondent
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 27(1)(d) READ WITH SECTIONS 58(1)(a)(iii) AND 59(1)(a) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 89 OF 1998), AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND PARAMOUNT MILLS (PTY) LTD IN RESPECT OF ALLEGED CONTRAVENTIONS
OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998.
1.
PREAMBLE
The Competition Commission ("the Commission") and Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd ("Paramount") hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal ("the Tribunal") for the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 27(1)(d) read with sections 58(1)(a)(iii) and 59(1)(a) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended ("the Act") on the terms set out below:
2.
DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this Settlement Agreement the following definitions shall apply:
2.1 "Act" means the Competition Act1 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended;
2.2 "Affected turnover" means turnover for the sale of white maize meal for human consumption for the financial year ending in 2007;
2.3 "Blinkwater Milling" means Blinkwater Mills (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated as such in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at 57 Walter Sisulu Street, Middelburg, Mpumalanga;
2.4 "Bothaville" means Bothaville Milling (Pty) Ltd t/a Thuso Mills, a company duly incorporated as such in accordance with the applicable laws of
the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at 10th Avenue, lndustria Site, Bothaville, Free State Province;
2.5 "Brenner" means Brenner Mills (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa,
with its principal place of business at 980 Park Street, Arcadia, Pretoria, Gauteng;
2.6 "Carolina Mills" means Carolina Mills (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at 27 Voortrekker Street, Carolina, Mpumalanga Province;
2.7 "CLP" means the Commission's Corporate Leniency Policy in Government Gazette number: 31064 of 2008;
2.8 "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;
2.9 "Complaint" means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner in terms of section 498(1) of the Act under CC case number: 2007Mar2844 and CT
case number: 15/CR/MAR10;
2.10 "Days" means business days;
2.11 "Foodcorp" rneans Foodcorp (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at 415 Mitchell Street, Pretoria West, Gauteng;
2.12 "Godrich" means Godrich Milling (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa,
with its principal place of business at Lanham Street, Extension Bronkhorstspruit, Mpumalanga Province;
2.13 "Kalel" means Kale! Mills, now t/a lsizwe Mills (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic
of South Africa, whose last known business address was at 32 Watt Street, lndustrial Area, Middelburg, Mpumalanga;
2.14 "Keystone" means Keystone Milling (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa,
with its principal place of business at 47 Lucas Street, Rustenburg, North West Province;
2.15 "NTK Business" means the maize milling business of NTKLA which was acquired from NTK Kooperasie in 2003;
2.16 "NTK Kooperasie" means the cooperative known as NTK Kooperasie or Northern Transvaal Cooperative Limited, which operated the NTK Business prior to 2003;
2.17 "NTKLA" means NTK Limpopo Agri (Proprietary) Limited, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic
of South Africa under registration number: 1980/008381/06, with its principal place of business at 84 Limpopo Street, Modimolle, Limpopo Province;
2.18 "Paramount" means Paramount Mills (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa,
with its principal place of business at 4 Royan Road, Gately East London, Eastern cape;
2.19 "Paramount Holdings Limited" means Paramount Holding Limited, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of Bermuda, with registration number: 48029;
2.20 "Parties" means the Commission and Paramount;
2.21 "Pioneer" means Pioneer Foods (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa,
with its principal place of business at 32 Markstraat, Paarl, Cape Town, Western Cape;
2.22 "Premier" means Premier Foods (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa,
with its principal place of business at 1 Joint Street, lsando, Johannesburg, Gauteng;
2.23 ''Pride Milling" means Pride Milling (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at Ground Floor, Block C, Futuram Office Park, 117 Lenchen Avenue, Centurion, Pretoria, Gauteng;
2.24 "Progress Millingn means AM Alberts (Pty) Ltd, trading as Progress Milling, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at No. 1 20th Street, lndustria Polokwane, Limpopo Province;
2.25 "Respondents" means all the firms that are cited in the complaint referral;
2.26 "Seaboard Corporation" means a public company incorporated in Delaware with company number 0405526, with its registered office is at 9000 West 57th Street, Suite 300, Shawnee Mission, KS 66202, United States of America;
2.27 "Settlement Agreement" means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Paramount;
2.28 "Tiger'' means Tiger Brands Limited, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at 301O William Nicol Drive, Bryanston, Johannesburg, Gauteng;
2.29 "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal
place of business at 3rct Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;
2.30 "TWK" means TWK Milling, the milling business of TWK Agri (Pty) Ltd;
2.31 "TWK Agri" means TWK Agri (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at 31a Market St, Piet Retief, Mpumalanga Province;
2.32 "Westra" means Westra Milling (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa,
with its principal place of business at Stasia Straat, Christiana, Northern Cape.
3. BACKGROUND AND THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATIONS
AND FINDINGS
3.1 On or about 14 March 2007, the Commission initiated a complaint against Tiger, Pioneer, Foodcorp, Pride Milling and Progress Milling in the maize milling industry, under CC case number: 2007Mar2844. The initiation was subsequently amended to include other players in the maize milling industry namely, Bothaville, Godrich, TWK, Keystone, Westra, Carolina Mills, Brenner, Paramount, NTK Milling (Pty) Ltd, Kalel, and Blinkwater. The complaint was initiated after the Commission had received a corporate leniency application from Premier in 2007, which was corroborated by a further corporate leniency application by Tiger in the same year.
3.2 The Commission's investigation revealed that at various stages during the period 1999 to 2007 the respondents were involved in price fixing of white milled maize in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act in that various representatives of the firms cited as respondents engaged in the following conduct:
3.2.1 Attended various meetings and held telephone discussions in which they reached agreements in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act, and in such meetings and telephone discussions, the respondents, inter alia, agreed:
3.2.1.1 To fix the prices of milled white maize products;
3.2.1.2 To create uniform price lists for wholesale, retail and general trade customers; and
3.2.1.3 To the timing of the price increases and implementation thereof.
3.2.2 The agreements concluded at these meetings were used to secure coordination at both regional and national levels, and were mutually reinforcing.
3.3 During the above period, representatives of Paramount attended a number of these meetings and engaged in telephone conversations with Paramount's competitors (being millers of white maize products) at which they agreed to:
3.3.1 Directly fix the selling price of milled white maize products;
3.3.2 Directly fix dates on which such agreed price increments were to be implemented; and
3.3.3 Exchanged information about their pricing structures.
3.4 This conduct constitutes price fixing and fixing of trading conditions in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act.
3.5 Through these price fixing arrangements, Paramount and its competitors prevented and/ or limited price competition amongst themselves in relation to pricing of milled white maize meal products.
3.6 Prior to 2013, JRB Investments Limited was the majority shareholder in Paramount Mills.
3.7 On 28 August 2013 JRB Investments Limited sold a portion of its shareholding in Paramount Mills to Paramount Holdings Limited. Paramount Holdings Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Seaboard Corporation. The Seaboard Corporation and Paramount Holdings Limited had no interest in Paramount Mills prior to 28 August 2013. Paramount Holdings Limited did not exist prior to 2013, and was specifically established to hold shares in Paramount Mills on behalf of the Seaboard Corporation. Currently, Paramount Holdings Limited is the largest shareholder in Paramount Mills.
3.8 The Seaboard Corporation, does not admit liability on the part of itself, its subsidiaries, affiliates and related companies as they were not a party to the abovementioned collusive conduct and did not have any direct or indirect interest
4.
ADMISSION OF LIABILITY
4.1 Paramount admits that it contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act in that during the period between 1999 to 2006, it agreed with its competitors in the white maize milling market to directly and indirectly fix the selling price of milled white maize products,
agreed on the dates upon which these prices were to be implemented, and exchanged information about their pricing structures.
5.
FUTURE CONDUCT
5.1 Paramount confirms that the conduct referred to above has ceased, and it agrees to fully cooperate with the Commission in the prosecution of the remaining respondents under the Complaint referral. This cooperation includes, but is not limited to:
5.1.1 Providing such documentary evidence in its possession or under its control concerning the alleged contraventions contained in the Settlement Agreement, as well as to assist the Commission in the prosecution of the alleged contraventions covered by the Settlement Agreement;
5.2 Paramount further agrees and undertakes to:
5.2.1 Prepare and circulate a statement summarising the content of this Settlement Agreement to its managers and directors within 14 (fourteen) days of the date of confirmation of this Settlement Agreement as an order of the Tribunal;
5.2.2 Develop, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that its employees, management, directors and agents do not engage in future contraventions of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme should include mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring of any contravention of the Act; and
5.2.3 Submit a copy of such compliance programme outlined above to the Commission within 60 (sixty) days of the date of confirmation of the Settlement Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.
6.
ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY
6.1. Having regard to the provisions of sections 58(1)(a)(iii) read with sections 59(1)(a), 59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, Paramount accepts that it is liable to pay an administrative penalty.
6.2. The parties have agreed that Paramount will pay an administrative penalty in the total amount of R1 320 819.00 (one million, three hundred and twenty thousand, eight hundred and nineteen Rand), being 3% of Paramount's affected turnover for the 2007 financial year.
6.3. Paramount will pay half of the administrative penalty in the amount of R660 409.56 (Six hundred and sixty thousand, four hundred and nine Rand, and fifty six cents) within 10 (ten) days of the confirmation of this Consent Order as an order of the Tribunal. The balance will be paid in 12 equal instalments in the amount of R55 034.12 (fifty five thousand and thirty four Rand, twelve cents), and the last instalment will be paid on or before 31 January 2020.
6.4. The penalty must be paid into the Commission's bank account which is as follows:
Bank name: Absa Bank
Branch name: ABS COMM PUBL NR
Account holder: The Competition Commission
Account number: […]
Account type: Current Account Branch Code: 638056
Reference: Case number 2007Mar2844/ Paramount
6.5. The penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.
7.
FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT
This agreement is entered into in full and final settlement of the complaint set out in paragraph 3 above, and upon confirmation as an order of the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Paramount in respect of the conduct
contemplated under the Commission's complaint case number: 2007Mar2844.
Dated and signed at East London on the 30 day of January 2019
_____
Paramount
Name in Full: Johannes Gert Hendrik Comrink
Authority: Director
For the Commission
Dated and signed at PRETORIA on the 12 day of February 2019
____
Tembinkosi Bonakele
The Commissioner: Competition Commission
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.