Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v Singapore Airlines Ltd (45/CR/Apr12) [2012] ZACT 38; [2012] 2 CPLR 245 (CT) (15 May 2012)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that Singapore Airlines, through its local representatives, engaged in discussions with competitors regarding air fare rates and price increases for flights from South Africa to the Far East, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. Singapore Airlines admitted liability, cooperated with the Commission, and agreed to pay an administrative penalty equivalent to 7.56% of its passenger turnover out of South Africa for the 2009/2010 financial year, not exceeding the statutory maximum. The Tribunal was satisfied that the settlement agreement, including undertakings regarding future compliance and cooperation, was appropriate and in accordance with the Act. The Tribunal confirmed the consent order as proposed by the parties, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Singapore Airlines relating to the conduct under investigation.

Court disposition

Consent order confirmed; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings between the Commission and Singapore Airlines concluded.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Singapore Airlines is confirmed as a consent order.
  • Singapore Airlines shall pay an administrative penalty of R25,106,692.00 to the Competition Commission within 30 calendar days of confirmation of this order.
  • Singapore Airlines shall deliver a copy of its compliance programme to the Commission within 60 days of confirmation of this order.
  • Singapore Airlines undertakes to refrain from future contraventions of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act.
  • The administrative penalty shall be paid into the Commission's bank account and subsequently into the National Revenue Fund in compliance with section 59(4) of the Act.
  • All proceedings between the Commission and Singapore Airlines relating to the conduct under case number 2008Jan3474 are concluded.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant Counsel: Khotso Modise

Singapore Airlines Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Rosalind Lake

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 25,106,692
  • Penalty as Percentage of Passenger Turnover (2009/2010): ZAR 7.56

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Settlement Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that local representatives of Singapore Airlines participated in discussions with Cathay Pacific, Malaysian Airlines, and South African Airways regarding air fare rates and price increases for flights from South Africa to the Far East. These discussions occurred during 2004, 2005, and up to February 2006, and related to market fare levels and increases. The Commission submitted that this conduct contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act, which prohibits price-fixing between competitors. The Commission sought confirmation of the settlement agreement, which included an administrative penalty and undertakings regarding future conduct and compliance.
Respondent
Singapore Airlines admitted that its local representatives engaged in market fare discussions with competitors, thereby contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The respondent cooperated with the Commission's investigation, provided information and assistance, and agreed to implement and review its compliance programme. Singapore Airlines accepted the administrative penalty and undertook to refrain from future contraventions, deliver its compliance programme to the Commission, and assist in proceedings against other respondents.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended

    Section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act prohibits agreements between competitors to fix prices, which constitutes cartel conduct.

  2. 02

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended

    Section 58(1)(b) read with section 49D of the Competition Act empowers the Tribunal to confirm consent orders based on settlement agreements between the Commission and respondents.

  3. 03

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended

    Section 59(2) and (3) of the Competition Act provides for the imposition of administrative penalties not exceeding 10% of annual turnover for prohibited practices.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that Singapore Airlines, through its local representatives, engaged in discussions with competitors regarding air fare rates and price increases for flights from South Africa to the Far East, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. Singapore Airlines admitted liability, cooperated with the Commission, and agreed to pay an administrative penalty equivalent to 7.56% of its passenger turnover out of South Africa for the 2009/2010 financial year, not exceeding the statutory maximum. The Tribunal was satisfied that the settlement agreement, including undertakings regarding future compliance and cooperation, was appropriate and in accordance with the Act. The Tribunal confirmed the consent order as proposed by the parties, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Singapore Airlines relating to the conduct under investigation.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal notes the importance of effective compliance programmes in preventing future contraventions of competition law.
  • Cooperation by respondents in investigations and proceedings is a relevant factor in determining the appropriateness of settlement agreements and penalties.
  • The administrative penalty imposed is within the statutory limits and reflects the seriousness of cartel conduct.

Court disposition

Consent order confirmed; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings between the Commission and Singapore Airlines concluded.

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Singapore Airlines is confirmed as a consent order.
  • Singapore Airlines shall pay an administrative penalty of R25,106,692.00 to the Competition Commission within 30 calendar days of confirmation of this order.
  • Singapore Airlines shall deliver a copy of its compliance programme to the Commission within 60 days of confirmation of this order.
  • Singapore Airlines undertakes to refrain from future contraventions of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act.
  • The administrative penalty shall be paid into the Commission's bank account and subsequently into the National Revenue Fund in compliance with section 59(4) of the Act.
  • All proceedings between the Commission and Singapore Airlines relating to the conduct under case number 2008Jan3474 are concluded.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2012] ZACT 38

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC

OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: 45/CR/Apr12 014977

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission …..........................................................................................................Applicant

And

Singapore Airlines Ltd …..................................................................................................................Respondent

Panel : N Manoim (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal Member) and A Wessels (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 15 May 2012

Decided on: 15 May 2012

Order The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and the respondent, annexed hereto marked "A". Presiding Member N Manoim Concurring: Y Carrim and A Wessels

Order

The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and the respondent, annexed hereto marked "A".

Presiding Member

N Manoim

Concurring: Y Carrim and A Wessels

IN THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD IN PRETORIA) CT Case No: CC Case No: 2008Jan3474 In the matter between:

THE

COMPETITION COMMISSION …......................................................................................Applicant And

SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS LIMITED (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED …................First Respondent

SINGAPORE

AIRLINES LIMITED …..........................................................................Second Respondent

MALAYSIAN

AIRLINES ….............................................................................................Third Respondent

IN THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD IN PRETORIA)

CT Case No:

CC Case No: 2008Jan3474

In the matter between:

THE

COMPETITION COMMISSION …......................................................................................Applicant

SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS LIMITED (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED …................First Respondent

SINGAPORE

AIRLINES LIMITED …..........................................................................Second Respondent

MALAYSIAN

AIRLINES ….............................................................................................Third Respondent

FILING

SHEET

DOCUMENT FILED: 1.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMPETITION COMMISSION AND SINGAPORE

AIRLINES

DATED at

PRETORIA on this 19th Day of April 2012. Competition Commission 1st Floor, Mulayo, the Dti Campus, 77 Melntjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria Tel: 012 394 3281 Fax: 012 394 4281 E-mail: KhotsoM(g>compcom.co.za Ref: Khotso Modise TO:

THE

REGISTRAR OF THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 3rd Floor, Mulayo (Block C) The Dti Campus 77 Meintjies Street Sunnyside Pretoria | Tel: 012 394 3355 Fax: 012 394 0169 E-mail: Leratom(5>,comptrib.co.za/ ctsa@comptrib.co.za AND TO: Norton Rose South Africa Attorneys for the Second Respondent 15 Alice Lane Sandton Johannesburg 2196 T: 011 685 8941 F: 011 301 3200 E-mail: rosalind.lake@nortonrQse.com rosalind.lake@nortonrQse.com Ref: Rosalind Lake

FILING

SHEET

DOCUMENT FILED:

1.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMPETITION COMMISSION AND SINGAPORE

AIRLINES

DATED at

PRETORIA on this 19th Day of April 2012.

Competition Commission

1st Floor, Mulayo, the Dti Campus, 77 Melntjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria

Tel: 012 394 3281

Fax: 012 394 4281

E-mail: KhotsoM(g>compcom.co.za

Ref: Khotso Modise

TO:

THE

REGISTRAR OF

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 3rd Floor, Mulayo (Block C)

The Dti Campus

77 Meintjies Street

Sunnyside

Pretoria |

Tel: 012 394 3355 Fax: 012 394 0169

E-mail: Leratom(5>,comptrib.co.za/ ctsa@comptrib.co.za

AND TO: Norton Rose South Africa

Attorneys for the Second Respondent

15 Alice Lane Sandton Johannesburg 2196

T: 011 685 8941 F: 011 301 3200

E-mail: rosalind.lake@nortonrQse.com rosalind.lake@nortonrQse.com Ref: Rosalind Lake

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

HELD

AT PRETORIA CT Case No: CC Case No. 2008Jan3474 In the matter between:

THE

COMPETITION COMMISSION ….........................................................Applicant and

SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED …......................First Respondent

SINGAPORE

AIRLINES LIMITED …................................................Second Respondent

MALAYSIAN

AIRLINES …..............................................................Third Respondent

AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND SINGAPORE AIRLINES ON THE TERMS OF AN APPROPRIATE ORDER IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D OF THE COMPETITION ACT NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED The Commission and Singapore Airlines hereby agree that application be made to the Tribunal to have this Agreement confirmed as a consent order as provided for in terms of section 58(1 )(b) as read with section 49D of the Act.

1. Definitions 1.1. For the purposes of this agreement the following definitions shall apply: 1.1.1. "Act* means the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended. 1.1.2. "this Agreement" means the agreement set out herein, duly signed by the Commissioner and Singapore Airlines. 1.1.3. "Singapore Airlines" means Singapore Airlines Limited, a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of Singapore with its registered South African office at 257 Oxford Road, lllovo, Johannesburg 1.1.4. "CLP" means the Commission's Corporate Leniency Policy. 1.1.5. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng. 1.1.6. "Commissioner" means the Competition Commissioner of South Africa, the Chief Executive Officer of the Commission appointed by the Minister of Trade and Industry in terms of section 22 of the Act. 1.1.7. "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act. 1.1.8. "Complaint" means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner under case number 2008Jan3474 in relation to a possible contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i)of theAcf. 1.1.9. "the Republic" means the Republic of South Africa.

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

HELD

AT PRETORIA

CC Case No. 2008Jan3474

THE

COMPETITION COMMISSION ….........................................................Applicant

and

SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED …......................First Respondent

SINGAPORE

AIRLINES LIMITED …................................................Second Respondent

MALAYSIAN

AIRLINES …..............................................................Third Respondent

AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND SINGAPORE AIRLINES ON THE TERMS OF AN APPROPRIATE ORDER IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D OF THE COMPETITION ACT NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED

The Commission and Singapore Airlines hereby agree that application be made to the Tribunal to have this Agreement confirmed as a consent order as provided for in terms of section 58(1 )(b) as read with section 49D of the Act.

1. Definitions

1.1. For the purposes of this agreement the following definitions shall apply:

1.1.1. "Act* means the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended.

1.1.2. "this Agreement" means the agreement set out herein, duly signed by the Commissioner and Singapore Airlines.

1.1.3. "Singapore Airlines" means Singapore Airlines Limited, a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of Singapore with its registered South African office at 257 Oxford Road, lllovo, Johannesburg

1.1.4. "CLP" means the Commission's Corporate Leniency Policy.

1.1.5. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

1.1.6. "Commissioner" means the Competition Commissioner of South Africa, the Chief Executive Officer of the Commission appointed by the Minister of Trade and Industry in terms of section 22 of the Act.

1.1.7. "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act.

1.1.8. "Complaint" means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner under case number 2008Jan3474 in relation to a possible contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i)of theAcf.

1.1.9. "the Republic" means the Republic of South Africa.

2. Background 2.1. On the 16 January 2008 the Commissioner initiated a complaint against SAA, Singapore Airlines and Malaysian Airlines for their involvement with Cathay Pacific in a cartel to fix air fare increases on both economy and business class flights into and out of South Africa to the Far East Asia. 2.2. The Commission has concluded its investigation and a decision has been taken that the matter be referred to the Tribunal for adjudication. 2.3. Singapore Airlines has engaged the Commission in settlement negotiations which have culminated in this settlement agreement.

3. Commission's findings Upon completion of its investigation into the Complaint, the Commission found that local representatives of Singapore Airlines in South Africa had engaged in the following conduct: 3.1. Engaged in discussions regarding air fare rates or prices in South Africa with Cathay Pacific, Malaysian Airlines and South African Airways on occasions during 2004, 2005 and ending February 2006. 3.2. The discussions related to market fare levels and increases on certain market fares for flights out of South Africa to South East Asia, Hong Kong and China. 3.3. Local representatives of Singapore Airlines in South Africa relied on the content of these discussions among other considerations to determine fares and gain knowledge on competitor activities and price movements in the above stated routes. 3.4. This conduct is in contravention of section 4(1 )(b)(i) of the Act.

4. Admission of Liability Local representatives of the Respondent engaged in market fare discussions which the Respondent admits contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act, as set out in the Commission's Findings in paragraph 3 above.

5. Agreement concerning future conduct 5.1. Singapore Airlines has cooperated with the Commission in its investigation of the matter and has provided information that significantly assisted the Commission in concluding its investigation. Singapore Airlines has also undertaken to provide the Commission with witnesses, evidence and assist in the referral proceedings against other respondents that the Commission elects to prosecute. 5.2. The conduct that is the subject of this investigation has ceased and Singapore Airlines undertakes that it will in future refrain from engaging in conduct which may contravene section 4(1 )(b)(i) of the Act 5.3. Singapore Airlines already has a competition (aw compliance programme in place that dates from late 2005 / early 2006, and which it is in the process of reviewing. Singapore undertakes to ensure that this compliance programme incorporates corporate governance which is designed to ensure that all employees, managers and directors of Singapore Airlines do not engage in any contraventions of the Act and in particular section 4{1)(b}(i) of the Act. 5.4. Singapore Airlines undertakes to deliver a copy of this compliance programme to the Commission within a period of 60 days after this settlement agreement with the Commission is confirmed by the Tribunal. 6, Administrative penalty 6.1. In terms of section 58(1)(a)(iii) of the Act read with

section 59(1 )(a), 59(2) and (3) of the Act, and in order to settle the matter Singapore Airlines agrees to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R25 106 692-00 (Twenty-Five Million One Hundred and Six Thousand, Six Hundred and Ninety-Two Rand). 6.2. The above amount is equivalent to 7.56 % of Singapore Airlines' passenger turnover out of South Africa during the financial year 2009/2010 and does not exceed 10% of Singapore Airlines' annual turnover out of South Africa in the same year. 6.3. Singapore Airlines will pay the amount set out in paragraph 6.1 above to the Commission within 30 calendar days from the date of confirmation of this Agreement by the Tribunal. 6.4. The penalty amount is to be paid into the bank account of the Commission. The Commission's banking details are as follows: Bank: ABSA Bank Name of Account: The Competition Commission Fees Branch Name: Pretoria Branch Code: 323345 Account Number: 4050778576

2. Background

2.1. On the 16 January 2008 the Commissioner initiated a complaint against SAA, Singapore Airlines and Malaysian Airlines for their involvement with Cathay Pacific in a cartel to fix air fare increases on both economy and business class flights into and out of South Africa to the Far East Asia.

2.2. The Commission has concluded its investigation and a decision has been taken that the matter be referred to the Tribunal for adjudication.

2.3. Singapore Airlines has engaged the Commission in settlement negotiations which have culminated in this settlement agreement.

3. Commission's findings

Upon completion of its investigation into the Complaint, the Commission found that local representatives of Singapore Airlines in South Africa had engaged in the following conduct:

3.1. Engaged in discussions regarding air fare rates or prices in South Africa with Cathay Pacific, Malaysian Airlines and South African Airways on occasions during 2004, 2005 and ending February 2006.

3.2. The discussions related to market fare levels and increases on certain market fares for flights out of South Africa to South East Asia, Hong Kong and China.

3.3. Local representatives of Singapore Airlines in South Africa relied on the content of these discussions among other considerations to determine fares and gain knowledge on competitor activities and price movements in the above stated routes.

3.4. This conduct is in contravention of section 4(1 )(b)(i) of the Act.

4. Admission of Liability

Local representatives of the Respondent engaged in market fare discussions which the Respondent admits contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act, as set out in the Commission's Findings in paragraph 3 above.

5. Agreement concerning future conduct

5.1. Singapore Airlines has cooperated with the Commission in its investigation of the matter and has provided information that significantly assisted the Commission in concluding its investigation. Singapore Airlines has also undertaken to provide the Commission with witnesses, evidence and assist in the referral proceedings against other respondents that the Commission elects to prosecute.

5.2. The conduct that is the subject of this investigation has ceased and Singapore Airlines undertakes that it will in future refrain from engaging in conduct which may contravene section 4(1 )(b)(i) of the Act

5.3. Singapore Airlines already has a competition (aw compliance programme in place that dates from late 2005 / early 2006, and which it is in the process of reviewing. Singapore undertakes to ensure that this compliance programme incorporates corporate governance which is designed to ensure that all employees, managers and directors of Singapore Airlines do not engage in any contraventions of the Act and in particular section 4{1)(b}(i) of the Act.

5.4. Singapore Airlines undertakes to deliver a copy of this compliance programme to the Commission within a period of 60 days after this settlement agreement with the Commission is confirmed by the Tribunal.

6, Administrative penalty

6.1. In terms of section 58(1)(a)(iii) of the Act read with section 59(1 )(a), 59(2) and (3) of the Act, and in order to settle the matter Singapore Airlines agrees to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R25 106 692-00 (Twenty-Five Million One Hundred and Six Thousand, Six Hundred and Ninety-Two Rand).

6.2. The above amount is equivalent to 7.56 % of Singapore Airlines' passenger turnover out of South Africa during the financial year 2009/2010 and does not exceed 10% of Singapore Airlines' annual turnover out of South Africa in the same year.

6.3. Singapore Airlines will pay the amount set out in paragraph 6.1 above to the Commission within 30 calendar days from the date of confirmation of this Agreement by the Tribunal.

6.4. The penalty amount is to be paid into the bank account of the Commission. The Commission's banking details are as follows:

Bank: ABSA Bank

Name of Account: The Competition Commission Fees

Branch Name: Pretoria

Branch Code: 323345

Account Number: 4050778576

6.5. The Commission will pay the penalty amount into the National Revenue Fund in compliance with section 59(4) of the Act 7. Full and final settlement This Agreement is entered into in full and final settlement and upon confirmation thereof as a consent order by the Tribunal concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Singapore Airlines relating to Singapore's involvement in the conduct that is the subject of the Commission's investigation under case number: 2008Jan3474. Dated and signed at ILLOVO on this the 12 day of MARCH 2012 Signature Name: Capacity:

FOR

THE COMMISSION Dated and signed at PRETORIA on this the 15 day of MARCH 2012 Shan Ramburuth Commissioner Competition Commission of South Afica

6.5. The Commission will pay the penalty amount into the National Revenue Fund in compliance with section 59(4) of the Act

7. Full and final settlement

This Agreement is entered into in full and final settlement and upon confirmation thereof as a consent order by the Tribunal concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Singapore Airlines relating to Singapore's involvement in the conduct that is the subject of the Commission's investigation under case number: 2008Jan3474.

Dated and signed at ILLOVO on this the 12 day of MARCH 2012

Signature

Name:

Capacity:

FOR

THE COMMISSION

Dated and signed at PRETORIA on this the 15 day of MARCH 2012

Shan Ramburuth

Commissioner

Competition Commission of South Afica

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.