Competition Commission v T.RAD Company Limited (CO112Sep20) [2020] ZACT 69 (21 September 2020)
- Citation
- [2020] ZACT 69
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Tembinkosi Bonakele
- Case number
- CO112Sep20
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Tembinkosi Bonakele
- Case number
- CO112Sep20
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and T.RAD Company Limited. Although T.RAD did not admit liability for contravening section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act, the Commission accepted this position due to the insignificant effects of T.RAD's conduct in South Africa. The agreement included T.RAD's undertaking to pay an administrative penalty of R500,000, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme, and refrain from future contraventions. The Tribunal found that the consent agreement resolved all issues arising from the Commission's investigation and was appropriate for confirmation as an order.
Court disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; compliance undertakings accepted.
Orders
- T.RAD Company Limited shall pay an administrative penalty of R500,000 to the Competition Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the consent agreement.
- T.RAD shall prepare and circulate a statement summarizing the consent agreement to its employees, managers, and directors within 14 days of confirmation.
- T.RAD shall refrain from engaging in conduct in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act in future.
- T.RAD shall continue and monitor its competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days of confirmation.
- All compliance reports and proof of payments shall be forwarded to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
- This agreement constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission's investigation into T.RAD under case no. 2014Nov0676.
02
Material facts
Parties
Competition Commission
ApplicantT.RAD Company Limited
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Administrative Penalty: ZAR 500,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Consent Order / Confirmation of Consent Agreement
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether T.RAD Company Limited and Denso engaged in cartel conduct in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act.
- 02
Whether the effects of T.RAD's conduct in South Africa warranted an admission of liability and administrative penalty.
- 03
Whether the consent agreement should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Competition Commission alleged that T.RAD and Denso entered into agreements and/or engaged in concerted practices to fix prices, divide markets, and tender collusively in respect of requests for quotations for automotive components supplied to original equipment manufacturers. The Commission concluded that these actions constituted contraventions of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act, and sought confirmation of a consent agreement imposing an administrative penalty and compliance undertakings.
- Respondent
- T.RAD Company Limited did not admit liability for contravening section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act, arguing that the effects of its conduct in South Africa were insignificant. Nevertheless, T.RAD agreed to the terms of the consent agreement, including payment of an administrative penalty and implementation of compliance measures, to resolve the matter fully and finally.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act 89 of 1998
Section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act prohibits agreements between competitors involving price fixing, market division, or collusive tendering.
- 02
Competition Act 89 of 1998
Section 49D allows the Commission and a respondent to enter into a consent agreement, which may be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- 03
Competition Act 89 of 1998
Section 58(1)(a)(iii) and 58(1)(b) empower the Tribunal to confirm consent agreements and impose administrative penalties.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and T.RAD Company Limited. Although T.RAD did not admit liability for contravening section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act, the Commission accepted this position due to the insignificant effects of T.RAD's conduct in South Africa. The agreement included T.RAD's undertaking to pay an administrative penalty of R500,000, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme, and refrain from future contraventions. The Tribunal found that the consent agreement resolved all issues arising from the Commission's investigation and was appropriate for confirmation as an order.
Obiter and limits
- The Commission did not insist on an admission of liability due to the limited impact of T.RAD's conduct in South Africa.
- The administrative penalty imposed does not exceed 10% of T.RAD's turnover for the 2017 financial year.
- T.RAD is required to circulate the consent agreement to its employees, managers, and directors, and submit its compliance programme to the Commission.
Court disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; compliance undertakings accepted.
- T.RAD Company Limited shall pay an administrative penalty of R500,000 to the Competition Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the consent agreement.
- T.RAD shall prepare and circulate a statement summarizing the consent agreement to its employees, managers, and directors within 14 days of confirmation.
- T.RAD shall refrain from engaging in conduct in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act in future.
- T.RAD shall continue and monitor its competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days of confirmation.
- All compliance reports and proof of payments shall be forwarded to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
- This agreement constitutes full and final settlement of the Commission's investigation into T.RAD under case no. 2014Nov0676.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Order
IN THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD IN PRETORIA)
CT Case No:CO112Sep20
CC Case No: 2014Nov0676
In the matter between:
THE
COMPETITION COMMISSION
Applicant
And
T.RAD
COMPANY LIMITED
Respondent
CONSENT
AGREEMENT
CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D AS READ WITH SECTIONS 58(1)(a)(iii) and 58(1) (b) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND T.RAD COMPANY LIMITED, IN RESPECT OF CONTRAVENTIONS OF SECTION 4(1)(b) (ii) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998.
Preamble
The Competition Commission and T.RAD Company Limited ("T.RAD") hereby agree that application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 49D read with section 58(1)(a)(iii) and 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, as amended, in respect of contraventions of section 4(1)(b) (ii) of the Act, on the terms set out below.
1. Definitions
For the purposes of this Consent Agreement, the following definitions shall apply:
1.1. "Act" means the Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, as amended;
1.2. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;
1.3. "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of the Commission, appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act;
1.4. "Complaint" means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner in terms of section 498(1) of the Act under case number 2014Nov0676;
1.5. "Consent Agreement'' means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and T.RAD;
1.6. "Denso" means Denso Corporation ("Denso") a company incorporated under the company laws of Japan, with its principal place of business situated at 1-1, Showa Kariya, Aichi 448-8661, Japan
1.7. "T.RAD" means TRAD Company Limited (including its subsidiaries) a company incorporated under the company laws of Japan with its principal place of business situated at 3-25-3 Yoyogi, Shibuya - Ku, Tokyo 151 -0053, Japan.
1.8. "Parties" means the Commission and T.RAD and Denso;
1.9. "Respondents" means T.RAD and Denso;
1.10. "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at Mulayo building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.
2. COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION
AND FINDINGS
2.1. The Competition Commission of South Africa ("the Commission") has received information that suggests that T.RAD and Denso allegedly concluded a general agreement and/or were party to concerted practices to fix prices that they would quote to original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"), divide markets and tender collusively in respect of Requests for Quotations ("RFQs") in the market for the manufacture and supply of Exhaust gas recirculation, Oil coolers, Radiators (for vehicles and motorcycles) and cooling fans, lntercooler and Automatic transmission fluid warmers to OEMs, in respect of 46 alleged cartel instances, outside of South Africa, in contravention of sections 4(1)(b)(i), 4(1)(b)(ii) and 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act. .
2.2. After investigation, the Commission concluded that T.RAD and Denso colluded in respect of forty-six (46) instances as listed in the attached Annexure T1.
2.3. The Commission further concluded that the conduct outlined above between T.RAD and Denso constitutes price fixing, division of markets and collusive tendering in contravention of sections 4(1)(b)(i),(ii) and (ii) of the Act.
3.
ADMISSION
3.1 T.RAD does not admit that it contravened section 4(1)(b) of the Act. The Commission did not insist on the admission of liability due to the insignificant nature of the effects of T.RAD conduct in South Africa.
4
FUTURE
CONDUCT
T.RAD agrees to:
4.1 prepare and circulate a statement summarizing the contents of this Consent Agreement to its employees, managers and directors within fourteen (14) days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal;
4.2 refrain from engaging in conduct in contravention of section 4 (1)(b) of the Act in future;
4.3 continue with and monitor its existing competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that its employees, management, directors and agents do not engage in future contraventions of the Act. In particular, this compliance programme includes mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring of any contravention of competition legislation, including the Act;
4.4 submit a copy of such complianc programme to the Commission within sixty (60) days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order by the Tribunal; and
4.5 undertakes henceforth to engage in competitive practices.
5
ADMINISTRATIVE PE
ALTY
5.1 T.RAD agrees and undertakes to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R500 000.00 (Five Hundred Thousand Rands). This amount does not exceed 10% of T.RAD's turnover for the 2017 financial year.
5.2 T.RAD shall pay the abovementioned amount to the Commission within 30 days from the date of confirmation of this consent agreement as an order of the Tribunal.
5.3 The administrative penalty must be paid into the Commission's bank account which is as follows:
Name: The Competition Commission Bank: Absa Bank, Pretoria
Account Number: [….]
Branch Code: 632005 Ref: 2014Nov0676
5.4 The administrative penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with the provisions of section 59(4) of the Act.
6
COMPLIANCE
All compliance reports and proof of payments relating to this matter shall be forwarded to the Commission at CartelSettlements@compcom.co.za.
7.
FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT
This agreement, upon confirmation as an order of the Tribunal, is entered into in full and final settlement in respect of the Commission's
investigation into the activities of T.RAD under case no. 2014Nov0676 and concludes all proceedings between the Commission and T.RAD.
Dated and signed at T.RAD Co., Ltd. on 20th of August, 2020
Tembinkosi Bonakele
Commissioner
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.