Coughlan N.O. v Road Accident Fund (977/08) [2013] ZAWCHC 212 (6 June 2013)
The court found that foster care grants are paid to foster parents to enable them to comply with their obligations to the child, and the child has no direct claim to the grant. The grant is not automatically triggered by the death of the breadwinner but rather by the need for care, which may exist independently of the death. The foster care grant is distinct from a child support grant, both in its purpose and administration. The foster care grant lapses upon the death of the foster parent, not the child, and is not paid directly to the child. The court held that, in the circumstances of this case, the foster care grant is a collateral benefit (res inter alios acta) and should not be...
- Citation
- [2013] ZAWCHC 212
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Wayne Coughlan N.O.; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 June 2013
- Case Number
- 977/08
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Judgment Delivered After Hearing on Deductibility of Foster Grants From Damages for Loss of Support
- Outcome
- The court held that foster care grants are res inter alios acta and are not deductible from damages for loss of support. The defendant is ordered to pay the proven damages to the plaintiff and the costs of the application.
- Judges
- Henney
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Support, Foster Care Grant, Res Inter Alios Acta, Assessment of Damages, Social Assistance Act, Road Accident Fund Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wayne Coughlan N.O.
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment Delivered After Hearing on Deductibility of Foster Grants From Damages for Loss of Support
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether foster care grant payments received by foster parents should be deducted from damages awarded for loss of support following the death of a breadwinner.
- 2 Whether such foster grants constitute res inter alios acta and are therefore non-deductible from patrimonial damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that foster care grants are paid to foster parents to enable them to comply with their obligations to the child, and the child has no direct claim to the grant. The grant is not automatically triggered by the death of the breadwinner but rather by the need for care, which may exist independently of the death. The foster care grant is distinct from a child support grant, both in its purpose and administration. The foster care grant lapses upon the death of the foster parent, not the child, and is not paid directly to the child. The court held that, in the circumstances of this case, the foster care grant is a collateral benefit (res inter alios acta) and should not be...
Court Disposition
The court held that foster care grants are res inter alios acta and are not deductible from damages for loss of support. The defendant is ordered to pay the proven damages to the plaintiff and the costs of the application.
Orders
- It is ordered that the child foster grants are res inter alios acta.
- The defendant is ordered to pay the proven damages to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment