G. J. L and Another v Road Accident Fund (A118/2023)
G. J. L and Another v Road Accident Fund (A118/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 232 (19 March 2025)
The appeal succeeded because the court a quo misdirected itself by disregarding unchallenged expert evidence that established a clear loss of earning capacity for the minor appellant. The correct approach is to compare the probable pre-injury and post-injury earning scenarios, applying appropriate contingency deductions (20% pre-injury, 30% post-injury) as supported by the evidence. The court a quo erred by awarding an arbitrary lump sum unrelated to the actuarial calculations and by requiring a level of certainty beyond the civil standard of proof. The evidence established a loss of R4,802,8…
Source excerpt
- Loss Of Earning Capacity
- Contingency Deductions
- Road Accident Fund Act
- Assessment Of Damages