Daimler Truck AG v Ukuvela Holdings Proprietary Limited (LM002Apr20) [2020] ZACT 23; [2020] 1 CPLR 345 (CT) (15 June 2020)
- Citation
- [2020] ZACT 23
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- E Daniels, A Ndoni, F Tregenna
- Case number
- LM002Apr20
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- E Daniels, A Ndoni, F Tregenna
- Case number
- LM002Apr20
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of Daimler Truck AG and Ukuvela Holdings, as Daimler does not compete with Ukuvela in the manufacture and supply of cast iron engine blocks for trucks. The vertical relationship, where Atlantis supplies engine blocks to Daimler, was assessed for input and customer foreclosure risks. The evidence showed that Atlantis has primarily supplied Daimler Trucks since 2015, and other truck manufacturers were in the run-out phase, reducing their purchases. The merged entity would be constrained by other suppliers in the upstream market, and no customers or competitors raised objections. The Commission's analysis found no public interest concerns relating to employment, small businesses, historically disadvantaged individuals, or local production. The Tribunal agreed with the Commission's findings and concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or raise public interest concerns. The merger was therefore approved unconditionally.
Court disposition
The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction between Daimler Truck AG and Ukuvela Holdings Proprietary Limited is approved without conditions.
- No public interest conditions are imposed.
02
Material facts
Parties
Daimler Truck AG
Applicant Counsel: A I. TzarevskiUkuvela Holdings Proprietary Limited
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Application / Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger between Daimler Truck AG and Ukuvela Holdings Proprietary Limited is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns under the Competition Act.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Daimler Truck AG argued that the acquisition would not result in any horizontal overlap, as no Daimler entity competes with Ukuvela in the manufacture and supply of cast iron engine blocks for trucks. The parties submitted that Atlantis has sold the majority of its output to Daimler Trucks since 2015, and other truck manufacturers supplied by Atlantis were in the run-out phase of their product lines, resulting in declining volumes. They contended that the transaction would not lead to input or customer foreclosure and that no public interest concerns arise.
- Respondent
- The Competition Commission argued that there is no horizontal overlap and identified a vertical relationship, as Atlantis supplies cast iron engine blocks to Daimler. The Commission assessed the risk of input and customer foreclosure and found that the merged entity would be constrained by other suppliers in the upstream market. The Commission also found that no third-party suppliers would be affected and that customers raised no objections. The Commission concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially lessen competition or raise public interest concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or if it raises significant public interest concerns.
- 02
Competition Commission Guidelines on the Assessment of Vertical Mergers
Vertical integration is assessed for potential input or customer foreclosure, but such concerns must be substantiated by evidence of market power and incentive to foreclose.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of Daimler Truck AG and Ukuvela Holdings, as Daimler does not compete with Ukuvela in the manufacture and supply of cast iron engine blocks for trucks. The vertical relationship, where Atlantis supplies engine blocks to Daimler, was assessed for input and customer foreclosure risks. The evidence showed that Atlantis has primarily supplied Daimler Trucks since 2015, and other truck manufacturers were in the run-out phase, reducing their purchases. The merged entity would be constrained by other suppliers in the upstream market, and no customers or competitors raised objections. The Commission's analysis found no public interest concerns relating to employment, small businesses, historically disadvantaged individuals, or local production. The Tribunal agreed with the Commission's findings and concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or raise public interest concerns. The merger was therefore approved unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the absence of objections from customers and competitors further supports the conclusion that the transaction does not raise competition concerns.
- The Tribunal observed that the long-term supply agreement between Daimler and Atlantis predates the merger and does not alter the competitive dynamics in the relevant markets.
Court disposition
The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
- The proposed transaction between Daimler Truck AG and Ukuvela Holdings Proprietary Limited is approved without conditions.
- No public interest conditions are imposed.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM002Apr20
In the matter between
Daimler Truck AG
Primary Acquiring Firm
And
Ukuvela Holdings Proprietary Limited
Primary Target Firm
Panel: Mr E Daniels (Presiding Member)
: Ms A Ndoni (Tribunal Member)
: Prof. F Tregenna (Tribunal Member)
Heard on: 27 May 2020 Order
Issued on: 27 May 2020
Reasons Issued on: 15 June 2020
REASONS
FOR DECISION
Approval
[1] On 27 May 2020, the Tribunal unconditionally approved the proposed transaction in terms of which Daimler Truck AG (“Daimler Truck”) is acquiring control over Ukuvela Holdings Proprietary Limited (“Ukuvela Holdings”).
[2] The reasons for the approval of the proposed transaction follow.
Parties to the transaction
[3] The primary acquiring firm is Daimler Truck, a public company incorporated in terms of German Laws. Daimler truck is controlled by Daimler AG (“Daimler”). Daimler has direct as well as indirect control over numerous firms such as Mercedes - Benz South Africa Limited, Sandown Motor Holding Proprietary Limited, and Daimler Trucks and Busses South Africa Proprietary Limited. Daimler is not controlled by any firm.
[4] The Daimler Group develops, manufactures and distributes products and services in the automotive sector, on a global scale. Daimler Truck is in charge of the group’s global business in relation to the manufacturing and distribution of trucks and busses.
[5] The target firm, Ukuvela Holdings Proprietary Limited (“Ukuvela Holding”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ardan Livvey Investors B.V. (“Ardan Livvey”). Ardan Livvey is a limited liability company incorporated in accordance with laws of the Netherlands. Ukuvela Holdings controls Atlantis Foundries Proprietary Limited (Atlantis) and Ukuvela Properties Proprietary Limited (“Ukuvela Properties”).
[6] Ukuvela Holdings, through Atlantis, operates a metal foundry which manufactures and sells iron engine blocks for heavy duty trucks.
[7] Atlantis formed part of the Daimler group until 2015 when it was aquired by Neue Halberg-Guss GmbH. Subsequent to this acquisition, a long-term supply agreement was concluded between Daimler and Atlantis, in terms of which Atlantis would supply Daimler with cast iron engine blocks for trucks.
Proposed transaction
[8] Daimler Truck’s intention is to acquire 100% of the issued share capital of Ukuvela Holdings from Ardan Livvey. Post-merger, Daimler Truck will wholly own and control Ukuvela Holdings and its subsidiaries.
Impact on competition
[9] The Competition Commission (Commission) found no horizontal overlap in the activities of the merging parties due to the fact that no entity from the Daimler Group is in a position to compete with Ukuvela in the manufacture and supply of cast iron engine blocks for trucks.
Vertical Assessment
[10] The Commission identified a vertical overlap as Ukuvela, through Atlantis, supplies cast iron engine blocks for trucks to the Daimler group. In its assessment, the Commission therefore assessed the upstream market for the manufacture and supply of cast iron engine blocks, as well as the downstream market for the manufacture of trucks.
Input foreclosure
[11] With regard to input foreclosure, the Commission questioned Atlantis’ ability and incentive to deny customers’ access to Atlantis by exclusively dealing with the Daimler Group, and whether this would substantially lessen competition. The Commission found that the merged entity will be constrained by other suppliers in the upstream market. Furthermore, the Parties submit that Atlantis has been selling a majority of its output to Daimler Trucks, since 2015. The remaining truck manufacturers that were supplied by Atlantis were in the run- out phase of their respective product lines and, therefore, the volume of products supplied by Atlantis to them continued to decrease. The Commission therefore found that a foreclosure strategy by the merged entity is unlikely to raise significant concerns. The Commission further found that customers, inter alia, CA Components raised no concerns/objections regarding the proposed transaction.
[12] Based on the information above, the Commission is of the view that the proposed transaction is unlikely to raise input foreclosure concerns.
Customer foreclosure
[13] The Commission found that Atlantis is the only supplier of cast iron engine blocks to the Daimler Group. As a result, no third-party suppliers will be affected by this transaction. In light of the above, the Commission found that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially lessen or prevent competition in the relevant markets. We find no reason to disagree with the Commission.
Public interest
[14] Subsequent to the Commission’s analysis of the proposed transaction’s potential effect on employment, small businesses or firms owned by historically disadvantaged individuals, local production and other public interest considerations, the Commission found there to be no public interest concerns.
Conclusion
[15] In view of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.
15 June 2020
Date
_____
Mr Enver Daniels
Ms Andiswa Ndoni and Prof. Fiona Tregenna concurring.
Tribunal Case Manager : Camilla Mathonsi and Kgothatso Kgobe
For the Merging Parties : A I. Tzarevski
For the Commission : R Molotsi and T Masithulela
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.