Datacentrix (Pty) Ltd v South African National Parks and Others (041563/2024) [2025] ZAGPPHC 325 (11 April 2025)
The court found that the tender documents, when read as a whole, required bidders to submit audited or independently reviewed annual financial statements for the most recent three years. Gijima Holdings (Pty) Ltd failed to comply with this requirement, submitting only two years of audited statements, while other bidders were disqualified for similar infractions. The court held that SANParks acted inconsistently and unfairly by allowing Gijima to proceed to the next phase despite non-compliance. The purported amendments to the tender requirements after the closing date were invalid and not properly published. The decision to award the tender to Gijima was not in accordance with the...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPPHC 325
- Parties
- Applicant: Datacentrix (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: South African National Parks; Respondent: Gijima Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Reikemetse Projects CC; Respondent: Wire Speed Systems (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: NEC XON Systems (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Try Lil Bytes-Themolo JV; Respondent: Business Connexion (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2025
- Case Number
- 041563/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment After Main Review Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted; decision to award tender set aside; applicant to continue services for twelve months; costs awarded against first and second respondents.
- Judges
- M.P. Motha
- Legal Topics
- Public Procurement, Mandatory Tender Requirements, Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Fairness in Tender Process, Bid Disqualification, Interpretation of Tender Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Datacentrix (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
South African National Parks
Respondent
Gijima Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Reikemetse Projects CC
Respondent
Wire Speed Systems (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
NEC XON Systems (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Try Lil Bytes-Themolo JV
Respondent
Business Connexion (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment After Main Review Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second respondent's failure to submit audited annual financial statements for three years constituted non-compliance with a mandatory tender requirement.
- 2 Whether the second respondent's failure to submit a Linux Professional Institute certificate constituted non-compliance with a mandatory tender requirement.
- 3 Whether SANParks applied the mandatory requirements consistently to all bidders.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the tender documents, when read as a whole, required bidders to submit audited or independently reviewed annual financial statements for the most recent three years. Gijima Holdings (Pty) Ltd failed to comply with this requirement, submitting only two years of audited statements, while other bidders were disqualified for similar infractions. The court held that SANParks acted inconsistently and unfairly by allowing Gijima to proceed to the next phase despite non-compliance. The purported amendments to the tender requirements after the closing date were invalid and not properly published. The decision to award the tender to Gijima was not in accordance with the...
Court Disposition
Application granted; decision to award tender set aside; applicant to continue services for twelve months; costs awarded against first and second respondents.
Orders
- The first respondent's decision to award the tender GNP-005-23 to the second respondent is reviewed and set aside.
- The applicant is directed to continue to deliver the current services to SANParks for a period of twelve months from the date of judgment on the same terms and conditions as set out in the agreement concluded in February 2019 pursuant to the award of bid number GNP-008-18 to the applicant mutatis mutandis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment