Davids and Another v M & Y Tombstones and Granite Works (Pty) Ltd (NCT/267544/2023/75(1)(b)) [2024] ZANCT 43 (27 September 2024)
The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide the contracted service in a manner and quality that consumers are generally entitled to expect, as required by section 54(1)(b)-(c) of the Consumer Protection Act. The respondent delivered a single-tier tombstone made with inferior materials instead of the agreed four-tier granite tombstone, and the structure has deteriorated rapidly. The respondent did not oppose the application, and under Rule 13(5), the applicants' allegations are deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the applicants suffered financial and emotional prejudice and are entitled to a refund of R46,000.00, representing a reasonable portion of the price paid,...
- Citation
- [2024] ZANCT 43
- Parties
- Applicant: Nandipha Davids; Applicant: Wayne Davids; Respondent: M & Y Tombstones and Granite Works (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2024
- Case Number
- NCT/267544/2023/75(1)(b)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application for Redress Under Section 75(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act
- Outcome
- Application granted. The respondent is ordered to refund the applicants R46,000.00 within ten business days. No cost order is made.
- Judges
- C Sassman, N Maseti, MC Peenze
- Legal Topics
- Consumer Protection Act, Quality of Goods and Services, Supplier Liability, Refund Entitlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nandipha Davids
Applicant
Wayne Davids
Applicant
M & Y Tombstones and Granite Works (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application for Redress Under Section 75(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent provided services in a manner and quality that persons are generally entitled to expect under section 54(1)(b)-(c) of the Consumer Protection Act.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to a refund for the defective and non-conforming tombstone supplied by the respondent.
- 3 Whether the respondent's conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under the Consumer Protection Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide the contracted service in a manner and quality that consumers are generally entitled to expect, as required by section 54(1)(b)-(c) of the Consumer Protection Act. The respondent delivered a single-tier tombstone made with inferior materials instead of the agreed four-tier granite tombstone, and the structure has deteriorated rapidly. The respondent did not oppose the application, and under Rule 13(5), the applicants' allegations are deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the applicants suffered financial and emotional prejudice and are entitled to a refund of R46,000.00, representing a reasonable portion of the price paid,...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The respondent is ordered to refund the applicants R46,000.00 within ten business days. No cost order is made.
Orders
- The respondent has contravened sections 54(1)(b) and (c) of the Consumer Protection Act.
- The respondent's contravention is declared prohibited conduct.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment