De Jager N.O and Another v Armaments Corporation of South Africa Limited t/a ARMSCOR (3113/2013) [2015] ZAECGHC 83 (1 September 2015)
The court held that the liquidators lawfully elected not to continue performance of the partially completed contracts and that the defendant, through its representative, agreed to pay the certified value of the work done and spares supplied. Regarding the BEE retention, the court found that the transfer of 25% members' interest to a black shareholder constituted compliance with the contractual BEE requirements within the stipulated period. Therefore, the defendant's entitlement to withhold and forfeit 10% of the invoice values fell away. The plaintiffs were entitled to judgment for the amounts claimed, interest, and costs.
- Citation
- [2015] ZAECGHC 83
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Werner de Jager N.O; Plaintiff: Hombakazi Ncediwe Bulube N.O; Defendant: Armaments Corporation of South Africa Limited t/a ARMSCOR
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 September 2015
- Case Number
- 3113/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Judgment After Consolidated Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs in both consolidated cases; defendant ordered to pay the claimed amounts, interest, and costs.
- Judges
- Pickering
- Legal Topics
- Liquidation, Executory Contracts, Bee Compliance, Contractual Damages, Interest on Judgment, Costs of Suit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Werner de Jager N.O
Plaintiff
Hombakazi Ncediwe Bulube N.O
Plaintiff
Armaments Corporation of South Africa Limited t/a ARMSCOR
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Consolidated Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the liquidators are entitled to payment for partially completed work and spares supplied prior to liquidation.
- 2 Whether the defendant was entitled to withhold and forfeit 10% of invoice values for alleged non-compliance with BEE contractual requirements.
- 3 Whether the transfer of 25% members' interest to a black shareholder constituted compliance with the BEE clause.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the liquidators lawfully elected not to continue performance of the partially completed contracts and that the defendant, through its representative, agreed to pay the certified value of the work done and spares supplied. Regarding the BEE retention, the court found that the transfer of 25% members' interest to a black shareholder constituted compliance with the contractual BEE requirements within the stipulated period. Therefore, the defendant's entitlement to withhold and forfeit 10% of the invoice values fell away. The plaintiffs were entitled to judgment for the amounts claimed, interest, and costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs in both consolidated cases; defendant ordered to pay the claimed amounts, interest, and costs.
Orders
- Defendant is ordered to pay to plaintiffs the sum of R419,489.37 under case no 3113/2013.
- Defendant is ordered to pay to plaintiffs the sum of R157,811.24 under case no 3113/2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment