Diageo Africa B.V v Newshelf 1167 t/a United National Breweries SA (021196) [2015] ZACT 143 (28 May 2015)
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction, involving Diageo acquiring the remaining 50% of UNB, would not alter the competitive structure of the affected markets, as Diageo already held a significant shareholding. The presence of other competitors, such as SAB and Distillers, and the non-homogenous nature of the products, made coordination unlikely. The Commission's investigation revealed no evidence that the merger would facilitate coordinated effects or enable unilateral price increases. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that there would be no adverse impact on employment or other public interest concerns. The Tribunal concurred with the Commission's assessment and...
- Citation
- [2015] ZACT 143
- Parties
- Applicant: Diageo Africa B.V; Respondent: Newshelf 1167 t/a United National Breweries SA
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2015
- Case Number
- 021196
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Approval / Decision
- Outcome
- Merger unconditionally approved.
- Judges
- Yasmin Carrim, Mondo Mazwai, Anton A Roskam
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Coordinated Effects, Public Interest, Market Structure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Diageo Africa B.V
Applicant
Newshelf 1167 t/a United National Breweries SA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 2 Whether the merger would facilitate coordinated effects among competitors.
- 3 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including adverse impact on employment.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction, involving Diageo acquiring the remaining 50% of UNB, would not alter the competitive structure of the affected markets, as Diageo already held a significant shareholding. The presence of other competitors, such as SAB and Distillers, and the non-homogenous nature of the products, made coordination unlikely. The Commission's investigation revealed no evidence that the merger would facilitate coordinated effects or enable unilateral price increases. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that there would be no adverse impact on employment or other public interest concerns. The Tribunal concurred with the Commission's assessment and...
Court Disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The proposed transaction between Diageo Africa B.V and Newshelf 1167 t/a United National Breweries SA is approved unconditionally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment