Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 11

South African Gas Development Company SOC Ltd and Another v Republic of Mozambique Pipeline Investments Company (Pty) Ltd (LM116Nov21)

South African Gas Development Company SOC Ltd and Another v Republic of Mozambique Pipeline Investments Company (Pty) Ltd (LM116Nov21) [2022] ZACT 11 (5 January 2022)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a merger in which iGas and CMG each increased their stake in ROMPCO from 25% to 40%.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Market Structure
  • Public Interest
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Employment Effects
  • Large-merger-review
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 76

Standard Bank Group Limited v Liberty Holdings Limited (LM073Sep21)

Standard Bank Group Limited v Liberty Holdings Limited (LM073Sep21) [2021] ZACT 76 (9 December 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Standard Bank Group Limited’s merger to acquire the remaining Liberty Holdings shares and obtain sole control.

  • Large Merger
  • Market Structure
  • Public Interest
  • Regulatory Approval
  • Large-merger
  • Competition-tribunal
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 55

Digital Infrastructure Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Metro Fibre Networx (Pty) Ltd (LM038Jul21)

Digital Infrastructure Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Metro Fibre Networx (Pty) Ltd (LM038Jul21) [2021] ZACT 55 (26 August 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between Digital Infrastructure Investment Holdings and Metro Fibre Networx, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Public Interest
  • Market Structure
  • Bee Ownership
  • Fibre Networks
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 17

Afrique Pet Food (Pty) Ltd ("Afrique") v The Dry Pet Food Business of PhilAfrica Foods (Pty) Ltd (LM177Dec20)

Afrique Pet Food (Pty) Ltd ("Afrique") v The Dry Pet Food Business of PhilAfrica Foods (Pty) Ltd (LM177Dec20) [2021] ZACT 17 (24 March 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Afrique Pet Food’s acquisition of the dry pet food business of Philafrica Foods, finding no competition or public-interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Employment Transfer
  • No Retrenchments
  • Market Structure
  • Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 10

Lereko Capital (Pty) Ltd v Andru Mining (Pty) Ltd (LM179Jan21)

Lereko Capital (Pty) Ltd v Andru Mining (Pty) Ltd (LM179Jan21) [2021] ZACT 10 (24 February 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Lereko Capital’s acquisition of negative control over Andru Mining, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Negative Control
  • Market Structure
  • Public Interest
  • Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 26

Univeler PLC v Unilever N.V. (LM060Jul20)

Univeler PLC v Unilever N.V. (LM060Jul20) [2020] ZACT 26 (28 August 2020)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Unilever PLC’s merger with Unilever N.V., finding it was an internal reorganisation with no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Internal Reorganisation
  • Public Interest
  • Market Structure
  • Employment Effects
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 1

Investec Asset Management SA Group Limited v Investec Asset Management Holding (Pty) Ltd (LM1270ct19)

Investec Asset Management SA Group Limited v Investec Asset Management Holding (Pty) Ltd (LM1270ct19) [2020] ZACT 1; [2020] 1 CPLR 358 (CT) (9 January 2020)

The Competition Tribunal approved Investec’s large merger unconditionally, finding no horizontal or vertical overlap and no employment or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Demerger
  • Public Interest
  • Market Structure
  • Employment Effects
  • Large-merger
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2019] ZACT 7

African Equity Empowerment Investment Limited v SAAB Grintek Technologies (Pty) Ltd (LM233Jan19)

African Equity Empowerment Investment Limited v SAAB Grintek Technologies (Pty) Ltd (LM233Jan19) [2019] ZACT 7 (18 February 2019)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved AEEI’s acquisition of control over SAAB Grintek Technologies, finding no horizontal or vertical overlaps and no public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest
  • Market Structure
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
  • Public-interest
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2018] ZACT 39

Thebe Renewable Energy Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd vPhembani Solar Energy 1 (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM273Jan18)

Thebe Renewable Energy Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd vPhembani Solar Energy 1 (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM273Jan18) [2018] ZACT 39 (13 April 2018)

The Competition Tribunal approved Thebe Renewable’s acquisition of several renewable energy project companies, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest
  • Market Structure
  • Renewable Energy Projects
  • Merger-control
  • Public-interest
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 4

Kagiso Capital (Pty) Ltd v Kagiso Tiso Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM192Jan17)

Kagiso Capital (Pty) Ltd v Kagiso Tiso Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM192Jan17) [2017] ZACT 4; [2017] 1 CPLR 342 (CT) (13 February 2017)

The Competition Tribunal approved Kagiso Capital’s acquisition of an additional 21.3% stake in Kagiso Tiso Holdings, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest
  • Market Structure
  • Black Economic Empowerment
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.