Dipula Property Fund (Pty) Ltd v Asakhe Realty Investment (42/LM/May11) [2011] ZACT 46 (7 July 2011)
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction between Dipula Property Fund and Asakhe Realty Investment, including the related internal restructuring transactions, does not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in any relevant market. The post-merger market shares in the affected product and geographic markets are too low to raise competition concerns. Furthermore, the transaction does not negatively impact employment or raise any other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.
- Citation
- [2011] ZACT 46
- Parties
- Applicant: Dipula Property Fund (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Asakhe Realty Investment
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 July 2011
- Case Number
- 42/LM/May11
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Control / Approval of Proposed Merger
- Outcome
- Merger approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Merle Holden
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Market Share Analysis, Public Interest, Property Investment, Sale Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dipula Property Fund (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Asakhe Realty Investment
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Approval of Proposed Merger
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger between Dipula Property Fund and Asakhe Realty Investment is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction between Dipula Property Fund and Asakhe Realty Investment, including the related internal restructuring transactions, does not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in any relevant market. The post-merger market shares in the affected product and geographic markets are too low to raise competition concerns. Furthermore, the transaction does not negatively impact employment or raise any other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.
Court Disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment