Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 74

Government Employees Pension Fund duly represented by the Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited v Shenge Property Group Proprietary Limited (LM089SEP23)

Government Employees Pension Fund duly represented by the Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited v Shenge Property Group Proprietary Limited (LM089SEP23) [2023] ZACT 74 (7 December 2023)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved GEPF’s 49% acquisition of Shenge Property Group, finding no substantial competition concerns or public interest harm.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Public Interest Assessment
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Hdp Ownership
  • Employment Transfer
  • Property Investment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 17

Units on Park Street v WBHO Construction (LM181Feb23)

Units on Park Street v WBHO Construction (LM181Feb23) [2023] ZACT 17 (26 April 2023)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger involving WBHO Construction’s sale of an undivided share in a student accommodation property business.

  • Merger Control
  • Property Investment
  • Student Accommodation
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
  • Property-investment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2018] ZACT 59

Sanlam Life Insurance Limited v Ingenuity Property Investment (Pty) Ltd in respect of five immovable properties and letting enterprises situated in Century City (LM063May18)

Sanlam Life Insurance Limited v Ingenuity Property Investment (Pty) Ltd in respect of five immovable properties and letting enterprises situated in Century City (LM063May18) [2018] ZACT 59 (13 August 2018)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Sanlam Life’s acquisition of five Century City properties and letting enterprises from Ingenuity Property Investment.

  • Merger Control
  • Property Investment
  • Public Interest
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 32

Redefine Properties Limited v Cirano Investments 300 (Pty) Ltd (LM213Feb17)

Redefine Properties Limited v Cirano Investments 300 (Pty) Ltd (LM213Feb17) [2017] ZACT 32; [2017] 1 CPLR 369 (CT) (12 April 2017)

The Competition Tribunal approved Redefine Properties’ acquisition of a further 17.31% share in the Galleria property, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Market Definition
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Public Interest
  • Property Investment
  • Employment Effects
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 5

Amdec Investments (Pty) Ltd v Culemborg Investment Properties (Pty) Ltd (LM184Dec16)

Amdec Investments (Pty) Ltd v Culemborg Investment Properties (Pty) Ltd (LM184Dec16) [2017] ZACT 5; [2017] 1 CPLR 206 (CT) (26 January 2017)

The Competition Tribunal approved Amdec’s acquisition of Culemborg unconditionally, finding no market overlap, no lessening of competition, and no public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Substantial Lessening Of Competition
  • Public Interest
  • Property Investment
  • Merger-control
  • Substantial-lessening-of-competition
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2014] ZACT 69

Ellerine Bros (Pty) Ltd and Another v FHP Managers (Pty) Ltd (019430)

Ellerine Bros (Pty) Ltd and Another v FHP Managers (Pty) Ltd (019430) [2014] ZACT 69 (31 October 2014)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Ellerine Bros and Ellwain’s acquisition of FHP Managers’ 25% interest in Newpark Towers, finding no substantial competition concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Property Investment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2014] ZACT 103

SA Retail Properties (Pty) Ltd v AFHCO Holdings (018762)

SA Retail Properties (Pty) Ltd v AFHCO Holdings (018762) [2014] ZACT 103 (16 July 2014)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved SA Retail Properties' acquisition of AFHCO Holdings, finding no substantial competition harm or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Property Investment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2014] ZACT 11

SA Retail Properties (Pty) Ltd v AFHCO Holdings (018762)

SA Retail Properties (Pty) Ltd v AFHCO Holdings (018762) [2014] ZACT 11 (16 July 2014)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved SA Retail’s acquisition of AFHCO Holdings, finding no substantial lessening of competition or public interest concern.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Property Investment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2014] ZACT 93

AFHCO Proprietary Limited v 120 End Street Property Investments Proprietary Limited (018820)

AFHCO Proprietary Limited v 120 End Street Property Investments Proprietary Limited (018820) [2014] ZACT 93 (16 July 2014)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved AFHCO’s acquisition of the remaining 50% shareholding in 120 End Street Property Investments.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Property Investment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2014] ZACT 42

Growpoint Properties Ltd v Tiber Property Group (Pty) Ltd (018143)

Growpoint Properties Ltd v Tiber Property Group (Pty) Ltd (018143) [2014] ZACT 42 (5 March 2014)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Growthpoint Properties Ltd’s acquisition of Tiber Property Group after finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Property Investment
  • Retail And Office Space
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.