Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Ellerine Bros (Pty) Ltd and Another v FHP Managers (Pty) Ltd (019430) [2014] ZACT 69 (31 October 2014)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets. The merging parties' combined post-merger market share in Grade A office properties in Sandton and Environs would remain low, and significant competition from other property groups would persist. The transaction would not alter the market structure for speciality entertainment centres, as there was no overlap in retail properties outside Newpark. No public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal therefore approved the transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The acquisition by Ellerine Bros (Pty) Ltd and Ellwain Investments (Pty) Ltd of FHP Managers (Pty) Ltd’s 25% interest in Newpark Towers (Pty) Ltd is approved unconditionally.

02

Material facts

Parties

Ellerine Bros (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Vani Chetty

Ellwain Investments (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Vani Chetty

FHP Managers (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Seema Nunkoo

Amounts and remedies

  • Post Merger Market Share (grade a Office Properties, Sandton and Environs): 3.5
  • Pre Merger Shareholding of Each Acquiring Firm in Newpark (%): 23.86
  • Post Merger Shareholding of Each Acquiring Firm in Newpark (%): 36.36

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Approval / Reasons for Decision

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The acquiring firms argued that the transaction would enhance their respective property portfolios and that their increased shareholding in Newpark would not alter the competitive dynamics, as they already held significant interests in the company. They submitted that the transaction would not result in any material change to market structure or competition.
Respondent
The Commission submitted that the transaction would result in a horizontal overlap in Grade A office properties and retail properties, but the merged entity's market share would remain low and competition from other large property groups would persist. The Commission found no overlap in retail properties classified as speciality entertainment centres and concluded that the transaction would not affect market structure or raise public interest concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations must be assessed in merger proceedings, including the effect on employment and the ability of small businesses to compete.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets. The merging parties' combined post-merger market share in Grade A office properties in Sandton and Environs would remain low, and significant competition from other property groups would persist. The transaction would not alter the market structure for speciality entertainment centres, as there was no overlap in retail properties outside Newpark. No public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal therefore approved the transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the considerable amount of vacant Grade A office space in the Sandton node, which further mitigates any potential anti-competitive effects.
  • The Tribunal accepted that the acquiring firms were merely increasing their shareholding in Newpark, rather than introducing a new competitive dynamic.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

  • The acquisition by Ellerine Bros (Pty) Ltd and Ellwain Investments (Pty) Ltd of FHP Managers (Pty) Ltd’s 25% interest in Newpark Towers (Pty) Ltd is approved unconditionally.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2014] ZACT 69

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: 019430

In the matter between:

ELLERINE BROS. (PTY) LTD

and

ELLWAIN INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD..........................................................Primary Acquiring Firms

And

FHP MANAGERS (PTY) LTD

in respect of its 25% interest in

NEWPARK TOWERS (PTY) LTD...........................................................................Primary Target Firm

Panel: Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)

: Anton Roskam (Tribunal Member)

: Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 15 October 2014

Order Issued on: 15 October 2014

Reasons Issued on: 31 Octobér 2014

Reasons for Decision

Approval

[1] On 15 October 2014, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved the acquisition by Ellerine Bros. (Pty) Ltd and Ellwain Investments (Pty) Ltd of FHP Managers (Pty) Ltd.’s 25 % Interest in Newpark Towers (Pty) Ltd.

[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to transaction

Primary acquiring firm

[3] The primary acquiring firms are Ellerine Bros. (Pty) Ltd (“Ellerine Bros”) and Ellwain Investments (Pty) Ltd (“Ellwain”) (collectively referred to as the “Acquiring Firms”). The Acquiring firms are investment companies with property portfolios comprising of Retail and Office space in Gauteng. Ellerine Bros is jointly controlled by the Eric Ellerine Trust and the Sidney Ellerine Trust. Ellwain is jointly controlled by the following firms:

• Oxiana Limited (“Oxiana”);

• Argon Holdings Limited (“Argon Holdings”);

• Eric Ellerine Family Trust;

• Sidney Ellerine Family Trust; and

• Drawood Trust.

Oxiana, Argon Holdings and Drawood Trust do not own any firms in South Africa. Ellerine Bros and Ellwain jointly control Newpark Towers (Pty) Ltd (“Newpark”) together with FHP Managers (Pty) Ltd, Mr B D Van Wyk and Renlia Developments (Pty) Ltd.

Primary target firm

[4] The primary target firm is FHP Managers, in respect of its 25% interest in Newpark. Newpark is a property investment company that currently owns two office properties, classified as Grade A and B, situated in the Sandton and Johannesburg CBDs, as well as a specialist entertainment centre located in the Sandton CBD. FHP Managers is 100% controlled by the Standard Bank Group Limited. FHP Managers and Newpark do not control any other firms.

Proposed Transaction and Rationale

[5] The Acquiring Firms each own 23.86% of the shares and claims in Newpark. In terms of the Sale of Shares Agreement, the Acquiring Firms shall each acquire 12.5% of the shares and claims in Newpark from FHP Managers. Following the implementation of the proposed transaction, the Acquiring Firms will each hold 36.36% in Newpark.

[6] The Acquiring Firms submit, as a rationale for the transaction, that they seek to enhance their respective property portfolios.

Relevant Market and Impact on Competition

[7] An assessment of the merging parties’ activities found that the proposed transaction results in a horizontal overlap in respect of Grade A office properties and retail properties. With respect to Grade A office property, the merging parties will have a combined post-merger market share of between 1.5% and 3.5% in the Sandton and Environs node with an accretion of between 0.5% and 2%. The merged entity will still face competition from other large property groups such as Growthpoint, Annuity, Investec, Redefine as well as many other players in the market. Furthermore, there is a considerable amount of vacant Grade A office space in this node. The Tribunal further accepts that nothing will change in this market as the Acquiring Firms already have a pre-merger shareholding in Newpark, and through this transaction, are merely seeking to increase their respective shareholding in this regard.

[8] With respect to retail property, we find that there is no overlap between the retail properties owned by the merging parties outside of Newpark, as none of the Acquiring Firm’s retail properties are classified as speciality entertainment centres. Therefore the proposed transaction is unlikely to change the market structure of the market for the provision of speciality entertainment centres.

Conclusion

[11] In light of the above we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transactions. Accordingly we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally.

31 October 2014

DATE

Ms Yasmin Carrim

Andiswa Ndoni and Anton Roskam concurring

Tribunal Researcher: Derrick Bowles

For the merging parties: Vani Chetty - Baker & McKenzie

For the Commission: Seema Nunkoo assisted by Xolela Nokele

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.