Emfuleni Local Municipality v SAMWU obo Mdluli and Others (JR2106/19) [2025] ZALCJHB 172 (5 May 2025)
The court found that the delay in filing the review application was minimal and adequately explained, with good prospects of success, thus condonation was granted. The review application was reinstated as the period for filing the record only commenced upon receipt of the complete record, and both parties participated in the reconstruction process. The Rule 11 application for dismissal failed as the Applicant was not at fault for the incomplete record and acted diligently once reconstruction was possible. On the merits, the arbitrator's award was found to be unreasonable and disconnected from the evidence, as the transferred employees were not promoted but retained their salary levels....
- Citation
- [2025] ZALCJHB 172
- Parties
- Applicant: Emfuleni Local Municipality; Respondent: SAMWU obo Mdluli and Others; Respondent: Commissioner MM Legodi N.O; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2025
- Case Number
- JR2106/19
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review, Condonation, Rule 11 and Reinstatement Applications
- Outcome
- Review application upheld; arbitration award set aside and substituted with a finding that the Applicant did not commit unfair labour practice; cross-review dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- N Tshisevhe
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Labour Practice, Condonation, Review of Arbitration Award, Practice Manual Time Limits, Reinstatement of Review, Rule 11 Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emfuleni Local Municipality
Applicant
SAMWU obo Mdluli and Others
Respondent
Commissioner MM Legodi N.O
Respondent
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review, Condonation, Rule 11 and Reinstatement Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether condonation should be granted for the late filing of the review application.
- 2 Whether the review application should be reinstated after being deemed withdrawn due to incomplete record filing.
- 3 Whether the Rule 11 application for dismissal of the review application should succeed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the delay in filing the review application was minimal and adequately explained, with good prospects of success, thus condonation was granted. The review application was reinstated as the period for filing the record only commenced upon receipt of the complete record, and both parties participated in the reconstruction process. The Rule 11 application for dismissal failed as the Applicant was not at fault for the incomplete record and acted diligently once reconstruction was possible. On the merits, the arbitrator's award was found to be unreasonable and disconnected from the evidence, as the transferred employees were not promoted but retained their salary levels....
Court Disposition
Review application upheld; arbitration award set aside and substituted with a finding that the Applicant did not commit unfair labour practice; cross-review dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Condonation for the late filing of the review application is granted.
- The review application is reinstated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment