Erasmus v Minister of Safety and Security and Another (JR1122/09) [2011] ZALCJHB 112 (8 December 2011)

Erasmus v Minister of Safety and Security and Another (JR1122/09) [2011] ZALCJHB 112 (8 December 2011)

The court identified a patent spelling error in paragraph [29] of the judgment delivered on 7 December 2011. To ensure the judgment accurately reflects the court's intention, the word ‘inoperable’ is replaced with ‘inoperative’. This correction is made in accordance with the court's inherent power to vary its own...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] ZALCJHB 112
Parties
Applicant: Marinda Erasmus; Respondent: Minister of Safety and Security; Respondent: Commissioner of the South African Police Services
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
JR1122/09
Procedural Posture
Variation Application / Variation of Judgment
Outcome
The judgment is varied to correct a patent spelling error.
Judges
Robert Lagrange
Legal Topics
Variation of Judgment, Patent Error Correction
Civil Procedure Variation of Judgment Patent Error Correction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marinda Erasmus

Applicant

Minister of Safety and Security

Respondent

Commissioner of the South African Police Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Variation Application / Variation of Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there is a patent spelling error in the judgment handed down on 7 December 2011.
  2. 2 Whether the judgment should be varied to correct the error.

Ratio Decidendi

The court identified a patent spelling error in paragraph [29] of the judgment delivered on 7 December 2011. To ensure the judgment accurately reflects the court's intention, the word ‘inoperable’ is replaced with ‘inoperative’. This correction is made in accordance with the court's inherent power to vary its own orders to correct patent errors.

Court Disposition

The judgment is varied to correct a patent spelling error.

Orders

  • The word ‘inoperable’ in paragraph [29] of the judgment handed down on 7 December 2011 is replaced with ‘inoperative’.