Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 330

Mashilo v Lemmer and Others (Variation) (33669/2021)

Mashilo v Lemmer and Others (Variation) (33669/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 330 (12 April 2024)

The High Court varied an earlier order under Rule 42(1)(b) to correct patent errors in the judgment and order, including respondent references and the operative relief.

  • Variation Of Judgment
  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 42
  • Patent Error Correction
  • Civil-procedure
  • Rule-42
  • Variation-of-judgment
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZALMPPHC 96

Mathabatha v Kgomeswana and Others - Review (REV142/23)

Mathabatha v Kgomeswana and Others - Review (REV142/23) [2023] ZALMPPHC 96 (16 October 2023)

High Court review of a magistrate’s altered order: the court held the magistrate went beyond correcting a patent error and set aside the proceedings and orders.

  • Review Of Magistrates Orders
  • Patent Error Correction
  • Striking Off Vs Dismissal
  • Ultra Vires Action
  • Review-of-magistrates-orders
  • Patent-error-correction
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2022] ZASCA 161

LA Group (Pty) Ltd v Stable Brands (Pty) Ltd and Another (650/2020)

LA Group (Pty) Ltd v Stable Brands (Pty) Ltd and Another (650/2020) [2022] ZASCA 161 (25 November 2022)

The Supreme Court of Appeal amended its earlier trade mark order to correct a patent error in the registration number from 2013 to 2014.

  • Trade Mark Registration
  • Rectification Of Register
  • Patent Error Correction
  • Trade-mark-registration
  • Rectification-of-register
  • Patent-error-correction
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2018] ZALCC 14

Mazizini Community and Others v Minister for Rural Development and Land Reform and Others (LCC23/2007)

Mazizini Community and Others v Minister for Rural Development and Land Reform and Others (LCC23/2007) [2018] ZALCC 14 (3 August 2018)

The applications for leave to appeal were dismissed as there was no reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion on the factual findings or legal issues raised. The first plaintiff failed to produce evidence meeting the statutory threshold for restitution. The first defendant's proposed model for land allocation was not pleaded or claimed as relief and was not compatible with the parties before the court. Default judgment was properly granted against defendants who failed to defend the action, in accordance with Rule 58. The omission of Farm 243 from the order was…

  • Restitution Of Land Rights Act
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Default Judgment
  • Costs Order
  • Patent Error Correction
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2011] ZALCJHB 112

Erasmus v Minister of Safety and Security and Another (JR1122/09)

Erasmus v Minister of Safety and Security and Another (JR1122/09) [2011] ZALCJHB 112 (8 December 2011)

The Labour Court varied its earlier judgment to correct a patent spelling error, replacing “inoperable” with “inoperative” in paragraph [29].

  • Variation Of Judgment
  • Patent Error Correction
  • Variation-of-judgment
  • Patent-error-correction
  • Labour-court
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.