Faure v S (A250/2017) [2021] ZAWCHC 166 (20 August 2021)

Faure v S (A250/2017) [2021] ZAWCHC 166 (20 August 2021)

The appeal was dismissed because the evidence of two independent witnesses, both friendly with the appellant, established that he confessed to the robbery and murder. Their evidence was corroborated by the appellant's own admissions and circumstances surrounding the crime. The magistrate's findings on credibility and rejection of the appellant's version were supported by the record. The appellant failed to establish substantial and compelling circumstances to justify a lesser sentence, given the brutality of the murder, lack of remorse, and absence of exceptional personal circumstances. The prescribed sentence of life imprisonment was appropriate.

Citation
[2021] ZAWCHC 166
Parties
Appellant: Ryan Faure; Respondent: The State
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 August 2021
Case Number
A250/2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.
Judges
Bozalek, Le Roux
Legal Topics
Murder, Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances, Minimum Sentencing Legislation, Credibility of Witnesses, Confession Evidence
Criminal Law Murder Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances Minimum Sentencing Legislation Credibility of Witnesses Confession Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ryan Faure

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's conviction for murder was supported by evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
  2. 2 Whether the magistrate erred in accepting the evidence of key witnesses regarding the appellant's confession.
  3. 3 Whether substantial and compelling circumstances existed to justify a sentence less than life imprisonment.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the evidence of two independent witnesses, both friendly with the appellant, established that he confessed to the robbery and murder. Their evidence was corroborated by the appellant's own admissions and circumstances surrounding the crime. The magistrate's findings on credibility and rejection of the appellant's version were supported by the record. The appellant failed to establish substantial and compelling circumstances to justify a lesser sentence, given the brutality of the murder, lack of remorse, and absence of exceptional personal circumstances. The prescribed sentence of life imprisonment was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal against the appellant's conviction for murder and the sentence of life imprisonment is dismissed.
  • The conviction and sentence are confirmed.