G K obo M K v Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health (2795/2015) [2019] ZAFSHC 70 (6 June 2019)
The court found that the applicant's claim in her personal capacity had prescribed under section 11 of the Prescription Act, as she failed to exercise reasonable care to acquire knowledge of the debtor and the facts, and her inaction led to the late institution of proceedings. Condonation for late notice in respect of this claim could not be granted, as the debt was extinguished and the Act does not revive prescribed debts. In respect of the claim in her representative capacity as mother and guardian of M, a minor, prescription had not run due to section 13(1) of the Prescription Act. The applicant provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay, given her background and lack of legal...
- Citation
- [2019] ZAFSHC 70
- Parties
- Applicant: G K obo M K; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 June 2019
- Case Number
- 2795/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Condonation for Late Notice Under S3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act
- Outcome
- Condonation for late service of notice granted only in relation to the claim in applicant's representative capacity as mother and guardian of M; condonation refused for the claim in applicant's personal capacity.
- Judges
- Meintjes, AJ
- Legal Topics
- Prescription Act, Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Organs of State, Condonation, Minor Claims, Late Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G K obo M K
Applicant
Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Condonation for Late Notice Under S3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's claim in her personal capacity has prescribed under the Prescription Act.
- 2 Whether condonation should be granted for late service of notice in terms of section 3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act.
- 3 Whether the claim in the applicant's representative capacity as mother and guardian of a minor has prescribed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's claim in her personal capacity had prescribed under section 11 of the Prescription Act, as she failed to exercise reasonable care to acquire knowledge of the debtor and the facts, and her inaction led to the late institution of proceedings. Condonation for late notice in respect of this claim could not be granted, as the debt was extinguished and the Act does not revive prescribed debts. In respect of the claim in her representative capacity as mother and guardian of M, a minor, prescription had not run due to section 13(1) of the Prescription Act. The applicant provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay, given her background and lack of legal...
Court Disposition
Condonation for late service of notice granted only in relation to the claim in applicant's representative capacity as mother and guardian of M; condonation refused for the claim in applicant's personal capacity.
Orders
- Condonation for late service of notice in terms of section 3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act, 40/2002, is granted only in relation to the claim in applicant's representative capacity as mother and natural guardian of M.
- Condonation for late service of notice in relation to the claim in applicant's personal capacity is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment