Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

General Atlantic Partners, LP v Actis Holdings S.A.L.R (Luxembourg) (LM002Apr24) [2024] ZACT 29 (4 July 2024)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger does not raise competition concerns and will not have a negative impact on public interest. The Competition Commission recommended approval, and no objections were raised. Accordingly, the merger is approved under section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act, and a Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued.

Court disposition

Merger approved; Merger Clearance Certificate to be issued.

Orders

  • The merger between General Atlantic Partners, LP and Actis Holdings S.A.L.R (Luxembourg) is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

02

Material facts

Parties

General Atlantic Partners, LP

Applicant

Actis Holdings S.A.L.R (Luxembourg)

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Final Determination

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant submitted that the merger meets all requirements under the Competition Act and does not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The transaction is not expected to result in negative public interest effects.
Respondent
The respondent did not oppose the merger and confirmed that the transaction complies with the Competition Act. No adverse effects on competition or public interest were identified.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 1998, section 16(2)(a)

    A merger may be approved if it does not substantially prevent or lessen competition, or if any such effect can be justified on public interest grounds.

  2. 02

    Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a)

    The Tribunal must issue a Merger Clearance Certificate upon approval of a merger.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger does not raise competition concerns and will not have a negative impact on public interest. The Competition Commission recommended approval, and no objections were raised. Accordingly, the merger is approved under section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act, and a Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal notes the efficiency of the merger review process and the cooperation of the parties in providing all necessary information.

Court disposition

Merger approved; Merger Clearance Certificate to be issued.

  • The merger between General Atlantic Partners, LP and Actis Holdings S.A.L.R (Luxembourg) is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2024] ZACT 29

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No.: LM002Apr24

In the matter between: General Atlantic Partners, LP Primary Acquiring Firm And Actis Holdings S.A.L.R (Luxembourg) Primary Target Firm

Panel: M Mazwai (Presiding Member) A Kessery (Tribunal Member) T Vilakazi (Tribunal Member) Heard on: 02 July 2024 Decided on: 04 July 2024

ORDER

Further to the recommendation of the Competition Commission in terms of section 14A(1)(b) of the Competition Act, 1998 ("the Act") the Competition Tribunal orders that-

1. the merger between the abovementioned parties be approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Act; and

2. a Merger Clearance Certificate be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

Presiding Member

04 July 2024

Ms Mondo Mazwai

Date

Concurring: Adv Anisa Kessery and Prof Thando Vilakazi

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Competition Tribunal Rules

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.