Gewu v Mbanzeni and Another (25136/2019) [2020] ZAGPJHC 21 (31 January 2020)

Gewu v Mbanzeni and Another (25136/2019) [2020] ZAGPJHC 21 (31 January 2020)

The court found that the written agreement entitled the applicant to forty percent of the shares in the second respondent, effective from the date of signature. The references to resignation and joining the company related only to the timing of registration, not to the vesting of shareholding rights. The applicant had resigned from his previous employment and joined the second respondent, thereby fulfilling any conditions that might have existed. The alleged further conditions regarding conduct and company growth were interpreted as ongoing shareholder duties, not suspensive conditions. The applicant was entitled to ancillary relief as a shareholder, including access to financial...

Citation
[2020] ZAGPJHC 21
Parties
Applicant: Howard Cengani Gewu; Respondent: Andile Moses Mbanzeni; Respondent: Wax Engineering and Consultants (Pty) Ltd
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
31 January 2020
Case Number
25136/2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Specific Performance and Ancillary Relief
Outcome
Application granted in part; applicant awarded specific performance and ancillary relief as a shareholder, with costs.
Judges
L R Adams
Legal Topics
Share Transfer, Specific Performance, Company Share Register, Rei Vindicatio, Prescription Act, Shareholder Rights
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Share Transfer Specific Performance Company Share Register Rei Vindicatio Prescription Act Shareholder Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Howard Cengani Gewu

Applicant

Andile Moses Mbanzeni

Respondent

Wax Engineering and Consultants (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Specific Performance and Ancillary Relief

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to the transfer of forty percent shares in the second respondent pursuant to the written agreement.
  2. 2 Whether the agreement contained suspensive conditions that were not fulfilled by the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to ancillary relief including access to company documents and financial statements.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the written agreement entitled the applicant to forty percent of the shares in the second respondent, effective from the date of signature. The references to resignation and joining the company related only to the timing of registration, not to the vesting of shareholding rights. The applicant had resigned from his previous employment and joined the second respondent, thereby fulfilling any conditions that might have existed. The alleged further conditions regarding conduct and company growth were interpreted as ongoing shareholder duties, not suspensive conditions. The applicant was entitled to ancillary relief as a shareholder, including access to financial...

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; applicant awarded specific performance and ancillary relief as a shareholder, with costs.

Orders

  • The first and second respondents shall, within thirty days, transfer forty percent of the shares in the second respondent into the name of the applicant and do all things necessary to effect the transfer.
  • The first and second respondents or their authorised representative shall, within thirty days, issue the share certificate for the forty percent shareholding in favour of the applicant.