Giant Leap Workspace Specialists (Pty) Ltd v Scoin Trading (Pty) Ltd t/a The South African Gold Coin Exchange (2014/37464) [2016] ZAGPJHC 321 (23 November 2016)
The court held that the interpretation advanced by the defendant regarding the non-variation clause is not the only possible interpretation. The clause anticipates amplification of the agreement, and it is plausible that a new contract could be concluded without strict compliance with the non-variation clause. The validity of the second contract, being partly written and partly oral, is not so remote as to be implausible and should be determined at trial. Regarding the alleged vagueness and embarrassment, the court found that the pleadings, read as a whole and with a common-sense approach, are sufficiently clear for the defendant to know the case it must meet. Any lack of itemisation or...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPJHC 321
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Giant Leap Workspace Specialists (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Scoin Trading (Pty) Ltd t/a The South African Gold Coin Exchange
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2016
- Case Number
- 2014/37464
- Procedural Posture
- Exception Application / Exception to Particulars of Claim; Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Exception dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- M Olivier
- Legal Topics
- Exception to Particulars of Claim, Non Variation Clause, Contractual Amendment, Quantum of Claim, Vague and Embarrassing Pleading
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Giant Leap Workspace Specialists (Pty) Ltd
Plaintiff
Scoin Trading (Pty) Ltd t/a The South African Gold Coin Exchange
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Exception Application / Exception to Particulars of Claim; Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's particulars of claim disclose a cause of action in light of the non-variation clause.
- 2 Whether the particulars of claim are vague and embarrassing due to lack of itemisation of deductions.
- 3 Whether the second contract, partly written and partly oral, is valid despite not being signed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the interpretation advanced by the defendant regarding the non-variation clause is not the only possible interpretation. The clause anticipates amplification of the agreement, and it is plausible that a new contract could be concluded without strict compliance with the non-variation clause. The validity of the second contract, being partly written and partly oral, is not so remote as to be implausible and should be determined at trial. Regarding the alleged vagueness and embarrassment, the court found that the pleadings, read as a whole and with a common-sense approach, are sufficiently clear for the defendant to know the case it must meet. Any lack of itemisation or...
Court Disposition
Exception dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The exception is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment