Gumede and Others v Master of the High Court, Pietermaritzburg and Others (4315/2024P) [2025] ZAKZPHC 22 (26 February 2025)
The court found that the Master of the High Court acted outside the powers conferred by the Trust Property Control Act and the Trust Deed in appointing both the independent trustees (second and third applicants) and the new trustees (second to eleventh respondents). The Trust Deed did not authorise the Master to appoint independent trustees, nor did the Act provide for such appointments or for the extension of trustees' terms in the manner done. The purported appointments and authorisations were not based on lawful appointment as trustees. Consequently, the decision to appoint the new trustees on 20 February 2024 was unlawful and must be set aside. The application for reinstatement of the...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAKZPHC 22
- Parties
- Applicant: Dumisani Zakhele Gumede; Applicant: Xolani Maqhawe Zondo N.O; Applicant: Bongolwethu Precious Nota N.O; Respondent: Master of the High Court, Pietermaritzburg; Respondent: Bongumusa Joseph Mfeka; Respondent: Solani Norah Zulu; Respondent: Sipho Vusumuzi Mlungungwana; Respondent: Muziwenkosi Mkanene Mkwanazi; Respondent: Themba Eric Msweli; Respondent: Bhekinkosi Coshi Mfekayi; Respondent: Thembinkosi Almon Mlungwana; Respondent: Caleb Mthokozweni Msweli; Respondent: Bonginkosi Ishmael Ndlovu; Respondent: Loveness Silindile Mfekayi; Respondent: Minister of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2025
- Case Number
- 4315/2024P
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; appointment of trustees on 20 February 2024 reviewed and set aside; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Mngadi
- Legal Topics
- Trust Property Control Act, Appointment and Removal of Trustees, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, Locus Standi, Trust Deed Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dumisani Zakhele Gumede
Applicant
Xolani Maqhawe Zondo N.O
Applicant
Bongolwethu Precious Nota N.O
Applicant
Master of the High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Respondent
Bongumusa Joseph Mfeka
Respondent
Solani Norah Zulu
Respondent
Sipho Vusumuzi Mlungungwana
Respondent
Muziwenkosi Mkanene Mkwanazi
Respondent
Themba Eric Msweli
Respondent
Bhekinkosi Coshi Mfekayi
Respondent
Thembinkosi Almon Mlungwana
Respondent
Caleb Mthokozweni Msweli
Respondent
Bonginkosi Ishmael Ndlovu
Respondent
Loveness Silindile Mfekayi
Respondent
Minister of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master of the High Court lawfully appointed and removed trustees of the Western Shores Communal Property Trust.
- 2 Whether the appointments and removals complied with the Trust Property Control Act and the Trust Deed.
- 3 Whether the applicants have locus standi to demand appointment or reinstatement as trustees.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Master of the High Court acted outside the powers conferred by the Trust Property Control Act and the Trust Deed in appointing both the independent trustees (second and third applicants) and the new trustees (second to eleventh respondents). The Trust Deed did not authorise the Master to appoint independent trustees, nor did the Act provide for such appointments or for the extension of trustees' terms in the manner done. The purported appointments and authorisations were not based on lawful appointment as trustees. Consequently, the decision to appoint the new trustees on 20 February 2024 was unlawful and must be set aside. The application for reinstatement of the...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; appointment of trustees on 20 February 2024 reviewed and set aside; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The appointment of trustees of Western Shores Communal Property Trust on 20 February 2024, the 2nd to 11th Respondents, is hereby reviewed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment