Shepstone and Wylie Attorneys v De Witt N.O. and Others (CCT 171/23)
Shepstone and Wylie Attorneys v De Witt N.O. and Others (CCT 171/23) [2025] ZACC 14 (1 August 2025)
The Constitutional Court held that the Supreme Court of Appeal misapplied and misstated the law regarding trustee decision-making. The Trust Deed, as interpreted, allowed for decisions to be made at a quorate meeting of two trustees, provided reasonable notice was given to all trustees. The requirement for unanimity applied only to specific powers, such as conducting business in a commercial sense (item 26 of the appendix), and not to all trustee decisions. The resolution to execute the deed of suretyship was validly passed at a properly convened meeting, and the subsequent signing by two tru…
Source excerpt
- Trust Deed Interpretation
- Suretyship Authorisation
- Majority Vs Unanimity
- Resolution Validity
- Trustee Powers