Incorporated General Insurance Ltd. v Harris (41/84) [1984] ZASCA 38 (29 March 1984)

Incorporated General Insurance Ltd. v Harris (41/84) [1984] ZASCA 38 (29 March 1984)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court erred in awarding damages based on the value of the bus's component parts rather than its market value as a whole. The evidence established that the fair market value of the damaged bus after the collision, as at December 1975, was R4,250.00. The court found that Kellerman's evidence, as a knowledgeable buyer, was credible and justified this valuation. The respondent was unable to provide better evidence due to the appellant's sale of the bus, but the available evidence was sufficient for the court to assess damages. The appeal was allowed, and the damages award was reduced to R4,250.00.

Citation
[1984] ZASCA 38
Parties
Appellant: Incorporated General Insurance Limited; Respondent: Benedict Harris
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 March 1984
Case Number
41/84
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Damages Award
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Damages award reduced.
Judges
Rabie, Jansen, Smuts
Legal Topics
Insurance Contract, Assessment of Damages, Market Value, Breach of Contract
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Insurance Contract Assessment of Damages Market Value Breach of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Incorporated General Insurance Limited

Appellant

Benedict Harris

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Damages Award

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the fair market value of the damaged bus after the collision as at December 1975.
  2. 2 Was the trial court correct in awarding damages based on the value of component parts rather than the bus as a whole.
  3. 3 Did the plaintiff provide sufficient evidence to establish the market value of the bus in its damaged condition.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court erred in awarding damages based on the value of the bus's component parts rather than its market value as a whole. The evidence established that the fair market value of the damaged bus after the collision, as at December 1975, was R4,250.00. The court found that Kellerman's evidence, as a knowledgeable buyer, was credible and justified this valuation. The respondent was unable to provide better evidence due to the appellant's sale of the bus, but the available evidence was sufficient for the court to assess damages. The appeal was allowed, and the damages award was reduced to R4,250.00.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Damages award reduced.

Orders

  • The judgment of the court a quo is altered to read: Judgment for plaintiff in the amount of R4,250.00 with costs of suit.
  • Appellant is awarded costs of appeal.