Jaltech Structuring (Pty) Ltd v Impact Empowerment Ventures (Pty) Ltd (031028/2023; 031035/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 111 (10 February 2025)
The applicant established its claim on a prima facie basis, supported by the settlement agreement and the respondents' admission of indebtedness. The respondents failed to provide evidence that the debt is bona fide disputed on reasonable grounds. The court found that the respondents are commercially insolvent, as they cannot pay their debts as and when they fall due. The respondents' defences of privilege, breach of engagement, FAIS registration, duress, and disputed debt were rejected for lack of factual and legal foundation. The requirements for a final winding-up order under section 344(f) and section 345(1)(a) of the Companies Act, read with item 9 of Schedule 5 of the 2008 Companies...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPJHC 111
- Parties
- Applicant: Jaltech Structuring (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Impact Empowerment Ventures (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Impact Investment Management
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2025
- Case Number
- 031028/2023; 031035/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Application / Final Order
- Outcome
- Both applications for the winding up of the respondents are granted. Both respondents are placed into final winding-up in the hands of the Master of the High Court. Costs of both applications are to be costs in the winding-up of both respondents.
- Judges
- T E Joyini
- Legal Topics
- Company Liquidation, Commercial Insolvency, Settlement Agreement, Disputed Debt, Bona Fide Dispute, Costs in Liquidation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jaltech Structuring (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Impact Empowerment Ventures (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Impact Investment Management
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Application / Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents are unable to pay their debts as and when they fall due.
- 2 Whether the applicant's claim is bona fide disputed on reasonable grounds.
- 3 Whether the settlement agreement constitutes a valid and enforceable debt.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant established its claim on a prima facie basis, supported by the settlement agreement and the respondents' admission of indebtedness. The respondents failed to provide evidence that the debt is bona fide disputed on reasonable grounds. The court found that the respondents are commercially insolvent, as they cannot pay their debts as and when they fall due. The respondents' defences of privilege, breach of engagement, FAIS registration, duress, and disputed debt were rejected for lack of factual and legal foundation. The requirements for a final winding-up order under section 344(f) and section 345(1)(a) of the Companies Act, read with item 9 of Schedule 5 of the 2008 Companies...
Court Disposition
Both applications for the winding up of the respondents are granted. Both respondents are placed into final winding-up in the hands of the Master of the High Court. Costs of both applications are to be costs in the winding-up of both respondents.
Orders
- Both applications for the winding up of the respondents (case numbers 031028/2023 and 031035/2023) are granted.
- Both respondents are placed into final winding-up in the hands of the Master of the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment