Jaltech Structuring (Pty) Ltd v Impact Empowerment Ventures (Pty) Ltd (031028/2023; 031035/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 111 (10 February 2025)

Jaltech Structuring (Pty) Ltd v Impact Empowerment Ventures (Pty) Ltd (031028/2023; 031035/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 111 (10 February 2025)

The applicant established its claim on a prima facie basis, supported by the settlement agreement and the respondents' admission of indebtedness. The respondents failed to provide evidence that the debt is bona fide disputed on reasonable grounds. The court found that the respondents are commercially insolvent, as they cannot pay their debts as and when they fall due. The respondents' defences of privilege, breach of engagement, FAIS registration, duress, and disputed debt were rejected for lack of factual and legal foundation. The requirements for a final winding-up order under section 344(f) and section 345(1)(a) of the Companies Act, read with item 9 of Schedule 5 of the 2008 Companies...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPJHC 111
Parties
Applicant: Jaltech Structuring (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Impact Empowerment Ventures (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Impact Investment Management
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 February 2025
Case Number
031028/2023; 031035/2023
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Application / Final Order
Outcome
Both applications for the winding up of the respondents are granted. Both respondents are placed into final winding-up in the hands of the Master of the High Court. Costs of both applications are to be costs in the winding-up of both respondents.
Judges
T E Joyini
Legal Topics
Company Liquidation, Commercial Insolvency, Settlement Agreement, Disputed Debt, Bona Fide Dispute, Costs in Liquidation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 27 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jaltech Structuring (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Impact Empowerment Ventures (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Impact Investment Management

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Winding Up Application / Final Order

  1. 1 Whether the respondents are unable to pay their debts as and when they fall due.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's claim is bona fide disputed on reasonable grounds.
  3. 3 Whether the settlement agreement constitutes a valid and enforceable debt.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant established its claim on a prima facie basis, supported by the settlement agreement and the respondents' admission of indebtedness. The respondents failed to provide evidence that the debt is bona fide disputed on reasonable grounds. The court found that the respondents are commercially insolvent, as they cannot pay their debts as and when they fall due. The respondents' defences of privilege, breach of engagement, FAIS registration, duress, and disputed debt were rejected for lack of factual and legal foundation. The requirements for a final winding-up order under section 344(f) and section 345(1)(a) of the Companies Act, read with item 9 of Schedule 5 of the 2008 Companies...

Court Disposition

Both applications for the winding up of the respondents are granted. Both respondents are placed into final winding-up in the hands of the Master of the High Court. Costs of both applications are to be costs in the winding-up of both respondents.

Orders

  • Both applications for the winding up of the respondents (case numbers 031028/2023 and 031035/2023) are granted.
  • Both respondents are placed into final winding-up in the hands of the Master of the High Court.