Kilimanjaro Sakhumnotho Consortium (Pty) Ltd v Main Street 87 Proprietary Limited (LM130Sep15) [2015] ZACT 103 (19 November 2015)
- Citation
- [2015] ZACT 103
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Yasmin Carrim, Andiswa Ndoni, Anton Roskam
- Case number
- LM130Sep15
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Yasmin Carrim, Andiswa Ndoni, Anton Roskam
- Case number
- LM130Sep15
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that although both merging parties are active in the oil and gas market, there is no geographic overlap as the acquiring firm's interests were only in Libya and Nigeria, which have since been abandoned. The target firm operates in South Africa and neighbouring countries. The Commission's analysis was accepted, concluding that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Furthermore, the transaction does not raise any public interest concerns, including employment. The Tribunal therefore approved the merger unconditionally.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The large merger between Kilimanjaro Sakhumnotho Consortium (Pty) Ltd and Main Street 87 Proprietary Limited is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
Kilimanjaro Sakhumnotho Consortium (Pty) Ltd
Applicant Counsel: Ahmore Burger-SmidtMain Street 87 Proprietary Limited
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Large Merger Review / Approval Reasons
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger will substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including adverse effects on employment.
- 03
Whether there is a horizontal or geographic overlap between the merging parties.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The acquiring group argued that the transaction aligns with its investment focus in oil and gas markets and will introduce new BEE shareholders into Total South Africa (Pty) Ltd. The Consortium has no other business activities and its interests in oil blocks in Nigeria and Libya have been abandoned. The transaction is not expected to affect competition or employment negatively.
- Respondent
- The target group submitted that its shareholders wish to exit institutional shareholding and focus on investments with greater operational control. They confirmed that the transaction will not adversely affect employment and raises no other public interest concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
Public interest factors, including employment, must be considered in merger assessments.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that although both merging parties are active in the oil and gas market, there is no geographic overlap as the acquiring firm's interests were only in Libya and Nigeria, which have since been abandoned. The target firm operates in South Africa and neighbouring countries. The Commission's analysis was accepted, concluding that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Furthermore, the transaction does not raise any public interest concerns, including employment. The Tribunal therefore approved the merger unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the abandonment of interests in Libya and Nigeria by Sakhumnotho does not affect the competition analysis.
- No adverse effect on employment was confirmed by the merging parties.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
- The large merger between Kilimanjaro Sakhumnotho Consortium (Pty) Ltd and Main Street 87 Proprietary Limited is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM130Sep15
In the matter between:
Kilimanjaro Sakhumnotho Consortium (Pty) Ltd
Primary Acquiring Firm And
Main Street 87 Proprietary Limited
Primary Target Firm
Panel
: Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)
: Andiswa Ndoni {Tribunal Member)
: Anton Roskam (Tribunal Member)
Heard on
: 28 October 2015
Order issued
:on 28 October 2015
Reasons issued on :19 November 2015
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 28 October 2015, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") unconditionally approved the large merger between Kilimanjaro
Sakhumnotho Consortium ("Consortium") and Main Street 87 Proprietary Limited (Main Street").
[2] The reasons for approving the transaction follow.
Parties to the transaction
[3] The primary acquiring firm is the Consortium, a firm incorporated in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa ("RSA"). The Consortium is jointly controlled by Kilimanjaro Capital Proprietary Limited ("KiliCap") and Mpilo Oil & Gas Proprietary Limited ("Mpilo O&G"). KiliCap is controlled by Shira Holdings Proprietary Limited ("Shira Holdings"). Shira Holdings is not controlled by any firm. Mpilo O&G is controlled by Sakhumnotho Oil & Gas (Pty) Ltd ("Sakhumnotho O&G"). Sakhumnotho O&G is controlled by Sakhumnotho Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd ("Sakhumnotho Group"). Sakhumnotho Group is controlled by the Sipho Mseleku Trust. The Consortium has been established solely for this transaction and thus conducts no business activities. Mpilo O&G and KiliCap have no other business operations outside of this transaction. Shira Holdings is a 100% black owned and managed investment holding company and its only investment is in KiliCap. The Sakhumnotho Group has various investments in a wide range of sectors such as financial services, mining and resources, oil and gas, property aviation and manufacturing amongst others. Although at the time of the merger filing Sakhumnotho O&G held shareholding interests in Natural Resources Corporation South Africa ("NCRSA") and Oil of Africa, during the hearing the merging parties brought to our attention that Sakhumnotho has abandoned their interests in these oil blocks and no longer holds such interests in Nigeria and Libya.[1] Sakhumnotho also has an interest in Nu Fuel Proprietary Limited ("Nu Fuel"}, a firm that is active in the production of pyrolysis oil, solid residue, and low-grade carbon black.
[4] The primary target firm is Main Street, a private firm incorporated in accordance with the laws of RSA Main Street is controlled by TOSACO Proprietary Limited ("TOSACO"). TOSACO is controlled by Calulo Energy Investments Proprietary Limited ("Calulo Energy Investments"). Calulo Energy Investments is controlled by Calulo Energy Proprietary Limited ("Calulo Energy"). Calulo Energy is controlled by Calulo Petrochemicals Proprietary Limited ("Calulo Investments"). Although Main Street does not control any firm, its sole business activity is to hold 25% shares in Total South Africa (Pty) Ltd (''TSA"). TSA operates in the petroleum industry in South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Lesotho and Swaziland.
Proposed transaction and rationale
[5] The proposed transaction will facilitate an exit of the existing BEE shareholders Total South Africa (Pty) Ltd ("TSA")
and introduce a new consortium of BEE shareholders into the shareholding structure of TSA. Through the proposed transaction, the
Consortium intends to acquire 91.8% of shareholding in Main Street from TOSACO. Post-merger, the Consortium will control Main Street and indirectly jointly control TSA.
[6] The acquiring group submits that the proposed transaction is in line with its investment focus in the oil and gas markets. The target group on the other hand submits that its shareholders have taken a decision to focus on building controlling positions in investments with greater operational control and on exiting an institutional shareholding.
Competition assessment
[7] The Competition Commission ("Commission") considered the activities of the merging parties and found that there is a horizontal overlap, as both merging parties are active in the broad oil and gas market. TSA is active in South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Lesotho and Swaziland. The firms in which the acquiring firm has interests are only active in Libya and Nigeria. The Commission concluded that there is no geographic overlap arising from the proposed transaction, and decided not to assess the overlap any further. As mentioned in paragraph 3 above, the interests of Sakhumnotho in Libya and Nigeria have been abandoned. We are of the view that this does not impact on the Commission's analysis of the proposed transaction and thus agree with the Commission that the proposed transaction will not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.
Public interest
[8] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will not have any adverse effect on employment in South Africa. [2]
[9] The proposed transaction raises no other public interest concerns.
CONCLUSION
[10] We agree with the Commission's finding that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. We therefore approve the proposed transaction without conditions.
19 November 2015
DATE
_______
Ms Yasmin Carrim
Ms Andiswa Ndoni and Ms Anton Roskam concurring
Tribunal Researcher: Caroline Sserufusa
For the merging parties: Ahmore Burger-Smidt of Werksmans Attorneys
For the Commission: Thato Mkhize
[1] See page 4 of the Transcript of the hearing.
[2] See pages 76 of the merger record
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.