Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 74

K2021544474 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd v Kwatani Global (Pty) Ltd (LM052Aug21)

K2021544474 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd v Kwatani Global (Pty) Ltd (LM052Aug21) [2021] ZACT 74 (14 October 2021)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved Sandvik SRP’s acquisition of Kwatani Global, finding no substantial competition concerns but imposing a BEE shareholding condition.

  • Large Merger
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Bee Shareholding
  • Employment Effects
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 19

Unitrans Automotive Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Cedar Isle Auto (Pty) Ltd (LM147Jan20)

Unitrans Automotive Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Cedar Isle Auto (Pty) Ltd (LM147Jan20) [2020] ZACT 19 (29 April 2020)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Unitrans’ acquisition of Cedar Isle Auto, finding low combined market shares and no adverse public-interest effects.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Bee Shareholding
  • Smmes And Hdis
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2015] ZACT 103

Kilimanjaro Sakhumnotho Consortium (Pty) Ltd v Main Street 87 Proprietary Limited (LM130Sep15)

Kilimanjaro Sakhumnotho Consortium (Pty) Ltd v Main Street 87 Proprietary Limited (LM130Sep15) [2015] ZACT 103 (19 November 2015)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved the large merger between Kilimanjaro Sakhumnotho Consortium and Main Street 87 Proprietary Limited.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Public Interest
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Bee Shareholding
  • Petroleum Industry
  • Large-merger-review
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2015] ZACT 8

Ethos Private Equity Fund VI v TP Hentiq 6128 (Pty) Ltd (019935)

Ethos Private Equity Fund VI v TP Hentiq 6128 (Pty) Ltd (019935) [2015] ZACT 8 (20 January 2015)

The Tribunal found that the relevant markets for non-OEM automotive aftermarket parts were fragmented, with many competitors and no significant market power held by the merging parties. The overlap between the parties was further reduced by a recent transaction involving TiAuto. The Tribunal agreed with the merging parties that imposing a BEE-related undertaking was not justified, as none of the statutory factors under section 12A(3)(c) were present. The merger did not raise public interest concerns and was unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition. Accordingly, the merger was a…

  • Large Merger Review
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Public Interest Considerations
  • Bee Shareholding
  • Section 12a Competition Act
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.