Knipe and Others v Kameelhoek (Pty) Ltd t/a Schaapplaats 978 (Pty) Ltd and Another (A252/2011) [2012] ZAFSHC 160 (30 August 2012)
The court found that the companies are domestic family companies where a relationship of mutual trust and confidence among shareholders was contemplated. The evidence established that such a relationship is no longer possible due to serious disputes, discord, and exclusion of Carol from management. The breakdown was not wrongfully caused by Carol, as she had agreed to the sale of the farms and relinquishment of hunting rights for the greater good, and the allegations of fabrication were not supported by the evidence. The companies are solvent, and Carol's application as shareholder falls under section 81(1)(d)(iii) of the Companies Act. The court held that the just and equitable ground...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAFSHC 160
- Parties
- Appellant: Moira Elizabeth Knipe & 17 Others; Respondent: Kameelhoek (Pty) Ltd / Schaapplaats 978 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: The Master of the Free State High Court
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2012
- Case Number
- A252/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Liquidation Applications; Full Court Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; provisional liquidation orders granted for both companies.
- Judges
- Ebrahim, Van der Merwe, Molefe
- Legal Topics
- Just and Equitable Winding Up, Domestic Company Disputes, Section 81 Companies Act, Shareholder Oppression, Provisional Liquidation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moira Elizabeth Knipe & 17 Others
Appellant
Kameelhoek (Pty) Ltd / Schaapplaats 978 (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
The Master of the Free State High Court
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Liquidation Applications; Full Court Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the companies should be provisionally liquidated on the just and equitable ground under section 81(1)(d)(iii) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008.
- 2 Whether the breakdown of trust and confidence among shareholders justifies winding up.
- 3 Whether Carol, as shareholder, is wrongfully responsible for the breakdown in relations.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the companies are domestic family companies where a relationship of mutual trust and confidence among shareholders was contemplated. The evidence established that such a relationship is no longer possible due to serious disputes, discord, and exclusion of Carol from management. The breakdown was not wrongfully caused by Carol, as she had agreed to the sale of the farms and relinquishment of hunting rights for the greater good, and the allegations of fabrication were not supported by the evidence. The companies are solvent, and Carol's application as shareholder falls under section 81(1)(d)(iii) of the Companies Act. The court held that the just and equitable ground...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; provisional liquidation orders granted for both companies.
Orders
- Both appeals succeed with costs.
- The orders of the court a quo are set aside and replaced with provisional liquidation orders for both companies.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment