Sayers v Snaid and Morris Incorporated (130616/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 665 (8 July 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
130616/2023
Judge
Engelbrecht
The High Court granted a final winding-up order, finding the respondent unlawfully misrepresented liability for fees and pursued inflated execution against a creditor.
Firstrand Bank Ltd trading inter alia as First National Bank v Dr Bongani Investments 066 CC (2037/2023) [2025] ZALMPPHC 69 (2 April 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
2037/2023
Judge
Makoti
The High Court ordered the final liquidation of a close corporation after finding it commercially insolvent and rejecting lis alibi pendens and service objections.
Ackerman v Kalon Venture Partners Limited (2022/050857) [2025] ZAGPJHC 267 (13 March 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2022/050857
Judge
Dlamini
The High Court dismissed an application to place a company into provisional liquidation on just and equitable grounds, finding the case unsupported and self-serving.
Firstrand Bank Ltd trading inter alia as First National Bank v Dr Bongani Investments 066 CC (2037/2023) [2025] ZALMPPHC 41 (11 March 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
2037/2023
Judge
Makoti
The court found that the respondent was commercially insolvent, as evidenced by its failure to pay debts as they became due and its own admission of substantial outstanding indebtedness. The respondent's intermittent payments did not demonstrate commercial solvency. Statutory service requirements were met, and the points in limine raised by the respondent, including lis alibi pendens and alleged abuse of process, were dismissed as lacking merit. The court held that, in line with prevailing authority, a creditor is entitled to a winding-up order where the respondent is unable to discharge its…
Meisel and Another v Sweet Sue Investments CC and Another (2020/7700) [2025] ZAGPJHC 168 (20 February 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2020/7700
Judge
Raubenheimer
The High Court granted final winding up of a close corporation after finding an irretrievable deadlock between equal members and compliance with service requirements.
De Sa Miranda v True Ruby Trading 1035 CC and Another (20548/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 430; [2025] 1 All SA 645 (WCC) (30 December 2024)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
20548/2023
Judge
P Farlam
The court found that the applicant had been excluded from the management and information of True Ruby for an extended period, had not received his share of income, and that the second respondent's assertion that the applicant was no longer entitled to his membership interest was not credible. The evidence, including the Association Agreement, financial statements, and the conduct of the second respondent, supported the applicant's version that trust and confidence between the members had irretrievably broken down. The court held that, in the absence of viable alternative remedies and given th…
Business Partners Limited v Companies and Intellectual Properties Commission of South Africa and Others (14388/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 402 (29 November 2024)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
14388/2024
Judge
Andrews
The court found that Don Mo Property (Pty) Ltd was unable to pay its debts as envisaged in section 344 of the Companies Act, read with section 345(1)(c), due to breaches of loan agreements, failure to file annual returns, and non-payment of municipal rates and taxes. The directors lacked authority to oppose the liquidation application on behalf of Don Mo, as no shareholder resolution was passed as required by the Memorandum of Incorporation. The Badenhorst rule was applied, and the court determined that the debts were not bona fide disputed on reasonable grounds. The directors' mismanagement…
Tyrus Limited v Affinity Enterprise Capital (Pty) Ltd (D5007/2023) [2024] ZAKZDHC 59 (23 August 2024)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
D5007/2023
Judge
Z P Nkosi
The High Court granted a provisional liquidation order against Affinity Enterprise Capital (Pty) Ltd, rejecting arguments that repayment depended on the sale of CAMS software.