Kunene Rampala Inc. v North West Province Department of Education and Sport and Development (460/2022) [2023] ZASCA 120 (15 September 2023)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the addendum to the service level agreement was concluded in breach of section 217 of the Constitution and the applicable public procurement prescripts, including the Public Finance Management Act and Treasury Regulations. The transaction value exceeded the threshold requiring an open tender, which was not followed. The addendum unlawfully increased the scope, duration, and fees of the contract without competitive bidding. The Department was entitled to raise the invalidity of the addendum in its plea, and the court could declare the contract invalid and unlawful without a collateral challenge, as justice required. The appellant's request for a just...
- Citation
- [2023] ZASCA 120
- Parties
- Appellant: Kunene Rampala Inc.; Respondent: North West Province Department of Education and Sport Development
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2023
- Case Number
- 460/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the North West Division, Mahikeng
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Mbatha, Mothle, Hughes, Matojane, Mali
- Legal Topics
- Public Procurement, Constitution Section 217, Collateral Challenge, Contract Invalidity, Treasury Regulations, Just and Equitable Remedy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kunene Rampala Inc.
Appellant
North West Province Department of Education and Sport Development
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the North West Division, Mahikeng
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the addendum to the service level agreement was concluded in contravention of section 217 of the Constitution, the Public Finance Management Act, and National Treasury Regulations.
- 2 Whether the contract could be declared invalid and unlawful without a collateral challenge or counter-application for review.
- 3 Whether a just and equitable remedy under section 172(1)(b) of the Constitution was available to the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the addendum to the service level agreement was concluded in breach of section 217 of the Constitution and the applicable public procurement prescripts, including the Public Finance Management Act and Treasury Regulations. The transaction value exceeded the threshold requiring an open tender, which was not followed. The addendum unlawfully increased the scope, duration, and fees of the contract without competitive bidding. The Department was entitled to raise the invalidity of the addendum in its plea, and the court could declare the contract invalid and unlawful without a collateral challenge, as justice required. The appellant's request for a just...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment