Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
8 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2025] ZAMPMBHC 63

Premier of Mpumalanga v CAJV (Pty) Ltd and Another (Review) (5503/2023)

Premier of Mpumalanga v CAJV (Pty) Ltd and Another (Review) (5503/2023) [2025] ZAMPMBHC 63 (25 July 2025)

The High Court partly granted a self-review of Mpumalanga procurement contracts, set aside unlawful tender decisions, and ordered just and equitable relief on payments.

  • Public Procurement Irregularity
  • Self Review By Organ Of State
  • Condonation For Delay
  • Unlawful Contract Award
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
  • Legal Practice Act Fee Sharing
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2025] ZANWHC 123

Batumile Investments (Pty) Ltd v Rustenburg Local Municipality and Others (M247/2023)

Batumile Investments (Pty) Ltd v Rustenburg Local Municipality and Others (M247/2023) [2025] ZANWHC 123 (23 July 2025)

A tender review was dismissed after the validity period expired, the applicant had not exhausted internal remedies, and the court found the matter moot.

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Failure To Award Tender
  • Exhaustion Of Internal Remedies
  • Mootness
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2025] ZAECMHC 61

Hlamandana and Another v Premier, Eastern Cape Provincial Government and Others (Leave to Appeal) (2227/2023)

Hlamandana and Another v Premier, Eastern Cape Provincial Government and Others (Leave to Appeal) (2227/2023) [2025] ZAECMHC 61 (8 July 2025)

The court found that the applicants' grounds for leave to appeal were without merit. The remittal order was justified under Section 8(1)(c)(i) of PAJA and Section 172(1)(b) of the Constitution, which empower courts to grant just and equitable remedies, including remittal for reconsideration by the administrator. The applicants' argument that the remittal was not sought by any party was rejected, as the relief sought was broad enough to encompass such an order. The court held that the fourth respondent was lawfully appointed and the proceedings were still extant, thus he was not functus offici…

  • Remittal Of Administrative Action
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
  • Judicial Review
  • Punitive Costs
  • Statutory Interpretation
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2025] ZAGPJHC 629

City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd and Others (2023/095869)

City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd and Others (2023/095869) [2025] ZAGPJHC 629 (24 June 2025)

Leave to appeal was dismissed in a municipal rates-policy review, with the court finding no reasonable prospects of success or other compelling reason.

  • Public Participation
  • Rates Policy Review
  • Best Interests Of Child
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
  • Municipal Powers
  • Section 172 Constitution
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2025] ZAECMKHC 53

SKG Africa (Pty) Ltd v South African Local Government Association and Another (3641/2023)

SKG Africa (Pty) Ltd v South African Local Government Association and Another (3641/2023) [2025] ZAECMKHC 53 (19 June 2025)

The court reviewed SALGA’s procurement decision after finding it failed to evaluate all of SKG Africa’s multiple bids and ordered a fresh tender process.

  • Public Procurement
  • Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Bid Evaluation
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
  • Costs Award
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2025] ZAST 8

Special Investigating Unit v Helicopter and Airplane Logistical Operations (Pty) Ltd and Others (GP07/2023)

Special Investigating Unit v Helicopter and Airplane Logistical Operations (Pty) Ltd and Others (GP07/2023) [2025] ZAST 8 (5 June 2025)

The Tribunal found that the procurement process for the award and extension of the contract to the joint venture was materially irregular and unlawful. The advertised tender period was changed from 12 months to 3 years after bid closure, limiting competition and violating transparency and fairness. Committee members were not properly appointed in writing, and the construction component failed to comply with CIDB registration and advertising requirements. The contract extension was unauthorised and not approved by the Accounting Officer. These irregularities contravened section 217 of the Cons…

  • Public Procurement
  • Irregular Award Of Tender
  • Self Review
  • Construction Industry Development Board
  • Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 459

African Exploration and Mining and Finance Corporation (SOC) Limited v LME Plant Hire (Pty) Ltd (060853/2023)

African Exploration and Mining and Finance Corporation (SOC) Limited v LME Plant Hire (Pty) Ltd (060853/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 459 (30 April 2025)

Leave to appeal was dismissed, and the court corrected a clerical error in the contract amount under Rule 42, replacing R133,684,170 with R136,684,170.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
  • Clerical Error Variation
  • Contractual Dispute
  • Procurement Irregularity
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2025] ZALMPPHC 85

ML Nkosi Electrical Contractors CC and Another v Ba-Phalaborwa Local Municipality (Appeal) (HCAA40/2023)

ML Nkosi Electrical Contractors CC and Another v Ba-Phalaborwa Local Municipality (Appeal) (HCAA40/2023) [2025] ZALMPPHC 85 (25 April 2025)

The court found that the award of Tender 06/2012 to the appellants was unlawful and invalid due to procedural irregularities and non-compliance with statutory and constitutional procurement requirements. Despite the respondent's delay in instituting self-review proceedings, the importance of upholding the rule of law and legality outweighed the delay. Both parties had performed under the contract, and there was no evidence of fraud or bad faith by the appellants. The court held that, although the contract must be declared invalid, justice and equity require that the appellants not be deprived…

  • Municipal Tender Review
  • Unlawful Contract
  • Delay In Self Review
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
  • Section 172 Constitution
  • Public Procurement Irregularities
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 395

South African Tourism Board v Letsema Consulting and Advisory (Pty) Ltd and Others (64334/2021)

South African Tourism Board v Letsema Consulting and Advisory (Pty) Ltd and Others (64334/2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 395 (22 April 2025)

The High Court granted Letsema leave to appeal against a legality-review remedy, finding arguable issues about profits, reasonable expenses, appealability, and costs.

  • Just And Equitable Remedy
  • Public Procurement Review
  • Section 172 Constitution
  • Appealability Of Orders
  • Costs Award
  • No Profit Principle
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 287

Minister of Home Affairs and Another v Lawyers for Human Rights and Others (14238/21)

Minister of Home Affairs and Another v Lawyers for Human Rights and Others (14238/21) [2025] ZAGPPHC 287 (20 March 2025)

The High Court extended a suspended declaration of invalidity over blocked identity numbers, dismissed a challenge to its authority, and ordered costs against the applicants.

  • Declaration Of Invalidity
  • Extension Of Suspension
  • Fair Administrative Action
  • Identity Document Blocking
  • Rule Of Law
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.