Kunogqala Local Residents and Others v Ab Xuma Local Municipality and Another (4146/2023) [2025] ZAECMHC 4 (6 February 2025)
The court found that the respondents, as the local municipality, have a clear and unambiguous constitutional and statutory duty to construct and maintain municipal roads, including the Nogqala access road. The respondents' prolonged failure to act, despite repeated requests and consultations, constituted an ongoing violation of the Constitution, specifically the rights to access education, dignity, and basic municipal services. The respondents' reliance on budgetary constraints was rejected as insufficient justification for non-performance, given the constitutional imperative for diligent and timely fulfilment of obligations. The court held that the applicants are entitled to a mandatory...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAECMHC 4
- Parties
- Applicant: Kunogqala Local Residents; Applicant: Nowanathi Mxuxumba; Applicant: Nojikile Makhamba; Applicant: Asakhe Makhamba; Applicant: Ngcawe Ntsheqane; Applicant: Nobutnti Ntsheqane; Applicant: Lulamile Tsheqane; Respondent: AB Xuma Local Municipality; Respondent: The Municipal Manager, AB Xuma Local Municipality
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 February 2025
- Case Number
- 4146/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Opposed Motion
- Outcome
- Application granted. Mandatory order issued compelling respondents to construct Nogqala Road and report on progress. Costs awarded against first respondent.
- Judges
- A.S Zono
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Service Delivery, Mandamus, Constitutional Obligations, Local Government Roads, Right to Dignity, Access to Education
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kunogqala Local Residents
Applicant
Nowanathi Mxuxumba
Applicant
Nojikile Makhamba
Applicant
Asakhe Makhamba
Applicant
Ngcawe Ntsheqane
Applicant
Nobutnti Ntsheqane
Applicant
Lulamile Tsheqane
Applicant
AB Xuma Local Municipality
Respondent
The Municipal Manager, AB Xuma Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Opposed Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents have a constitutional and statutory duty to construct the Nogqala access road and complete the Nogqala bridge.
- 2 Whether the respondents' prolonged failure to construct the road and bridge constitutes a violation of constitutional rights, including access to education and dignity.
- 3 Whether budgetary constraints justify the municipality's failure to perform its legal obligations.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents, as the local municipality, have a clear and unambiguous constitutional and statutory duty to construct and maintain municipal roads, including the Nogqala access road. The respondents' prolonged failure to act, despite repeated requests and consultations, constituted an ongoing violation of the Constitution, specifically the rights to access education, dignity, and basic municipal services. The respondents' reliance on budgetary constraints was rejected as insufficient justification for non-performance, given the constitutional imperative for diligent and timely fulfilment of obligations. The court held that the applicants are entitled to a mandatory...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Mandatory order issued compelling respondents to construct Nogqala Road and report on progress. Costs awarded against first respondent.
Orders
- The respondents are directed to forthwith take all steps necessary to commence with and finish Nogqala Road that connects applicants’ village to the road to Ngcobo and Ugie Towns.
- The respondents are directed to report to the applicants through their legal representatives within one hundred and eighty (180) days of the steps already taken, and steps to be taken within ninety (90) days after the lapse of one hundred and eighty (180) days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment