KwaZulu Natal Consumer Protector and Another v Wosiyane Cold Rooms CC and Another (KZNCT03/2025) [2025] ZANCT 28 (13 May 2025)
The Tribunal found that the Defendants failed to deliver the cold-room as per the agreement and did not refund the payment, despite repeated promises. This conduct breached Section 4(5)(a) and Section 19(2) of the Consumer Protection Act. The Tribunal declared the conduct prohibited, cancelled the sale agreement, ordered a refund of R20,000.00 plus interest at the prime overdraft rate, and imposed an administrative penalty of R15,000.00. The orders are to be executed within 15 days. The matter was unopposed, and the evidence presented by the applicants was accepted in full.
- Citation
- [2025] ZANCT 28
- Parties
- Applicant: KwaZulu Natal Consumer Protector; Applicant: Lindokuhle Sangweni; Respondent: Wosiyane Cold Rooms CC; Respondent: Matthews Bongani Chemane
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2025
- Case Number
- KZNCT03/2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The Defendants are declared to have engaged in prohibited conduct, the sale agreement is cancelled, and the Defendants are ordered to refund the applicant and pay an administrative penalty.
- Judges
- B. Dumisa, N. Cawe, S. Mbhele
- Legal Topics
- Consumer Protection Act, Prohibited Conduct, Refund Claim, Contract Cancellation, Administrative Penalty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KwaZulu Natal Consumer Protector
Applicant
Lindokuhle Sangweni
Applicant
Wosiyane Cold Rooms CC
Respondent
Matthews Bongani Chemane
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendants breached the Consumer Protection Act by failing to deliver goods and refund payment.
- 2 Whether the Defendants' conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under Section 4 and Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act.
- 3 What sanctions and remedies are appropriate under the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Defendants failed to deliver the cold-room as per the agreement and did not refund the payment, despite repeated promises. This conduct breached Section 4(5)(a) and Section 19(2) of the Consumer Protection Act. The Tribunal declared the conduct prohibited, cancelled the sale agreement, ordered a refund of R20,000.00 plus interest at the prime overdraft rate, and imposed an administrative penalty of R15,000.00. The orders are to be executed within 15 days. The matter was unopposed, and the evidence presented by the applicants was accepted in full.
Court Disposition
Application granted. The Defendants are declared to have engaged in prohibited conduct, the sale agreement is cancelled, and the Defendants are ordered to refund the applicant and pay an administrative penalty.
Orders
- The Defendants are declared to have engaged in prohibited conduct in contravention of Section 4(5)(a) and Section 19(2) of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008.
- The sale agreement and all subsequent agreements between the Second Plaintiff and the Defendants are cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment