Kwazulu-Natal Consumer Tribunal and Another v Khabelimsongo Construction (Pty) Ltd (KZNCT12/2022) [2022] ZACONAF 17 (29 November 2022)

Kwazulu-Natal Consumer Tribunal and Another v Khabelimsongo Construction (Pty) Ltd (KZNCT12/2022) [2022] ZACONAF 17 (29 November 2022)

The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to deliver the contracted goods and did not provide credible evidence for the alleged looting incident. The respondent's conduct constituted a breach of contract and prohibited conduct under the Consumer Protection Act. The parties negotiated and signed a settlement...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] ZACONAF 17
Parties
Applicant: Kwazulu-Natal Consumer Tribunal; Applicant: Nceba Dlamini; Respondent: Khabelimsongo Construction (Pty) Ltd
Court
Consumer Affairs Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
KZNCT12/2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure / Settlement Order After Hearing
Outcome
Settlement agreement confirmed and made an order of the Tribunal; terms enforceable; no order as to costs.
Judges
B Dumisa, P Dabideen, N Nursoo
Legal Topics
Consumer Protection Act, Settlement Agreement, Contract Termination, Refund Claim, Tribunal Enforcement
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Consumer Protection Act Settlement Agreement Contract Termination Refund Claim Tribunal Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kwazulu-Natal Consumer Tribunal

Applicant

Nceba Dlamini

Applicant

Khabelimsongo Construction (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Procedure / Settlement Order After Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the respondent breached the agreement by failing to deliver the detergent mixer machines as contracted.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under the Consumer Protection Act.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to a refund of the deposit paid for undelivered goods.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to deliver the contracted goods and did not provide credible evidence for the alleged looting incident. The respondent's conduct constituted a breach of contract and prohibited conduct under the Consumer Protection Act. The parties negotiated and signed a settlement agreement, which provided for delivery of the machines or, failing that, a refund of the deposit. The Tribunal was satisfied that the settlement agreement resolved the dispute and, in accordance with the parties' request and statutory provisions, made the agreement an order of the Tribunal. The Tribunal confirmed that the terms of the settlement agreement are enforceable and that...

Court Disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed and made an order of the Tribunal; terms enforceable; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement dated 8 November 2022 is confirmed and made an order of the KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Tribunal.
  • Should the respondent fail to deliver the machines, the full deposit of R21,840 becomes immediately due and payable to the applicant, with interest at the prescribed rate.