L v H and Another (2205/2016) [2018] ZAKZDHC 61 (28 November 2018)
The court found that the applicant, as co-holder of full parental rights and responsibilities, had made out a case for the relief sought. The evidence showed prior agreement between the parties regarding the surname change and the inclusion of the applicant's particulars on the birth certificate. The court held that the best interests of the child standard required recognition of both parents and that a double-barrelled surname would not prejudice the child but rather affirm his identity and rights. The court rejected the respondent's jurisdictional argument, finding that in the absence of the mother's consent, the court could dispense with such consent and order the Director General to...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAKZDHC 61
- Parties
- Applicant: L; Respondent: H; Respondent: Director General: Home Affairs
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2018
- Case Number
- 2205/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Opposed Application
- Outcome
- Application granted. The court ordered the first respondent to cooperate in the completion of forms for the alteration of the minor child's surname and the inclusion of the applicant's particulars on the unabridged birth certificate. The Director General was authorized and directed to effect the changes. No order as...
- Judges
- Henriques
- Legal Topics
- Change of Surname, Parental Responsibilities and Rights, Best Interests of Child, Births and Deaths Registration Act, Unabridged Birth Certificate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L
Applicant
H
Respondent
Director General: Home Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Opposed Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is in the best interests of the minor child for his surname to be altered to include that of his father, resulting in a double-barrelled surname.
- 2 Whether the applicant's particulars should be reflected on the minor child's unabridged birth certificate.
- 3 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to order the alteration of the minor child's surname under section 25(2) of the Births and Deaths Registration Act in the absence of the mother's consent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, as co-holder of full parental rights and responsibilities, had made out a case for the relief sought. The evidence showed prior agreement between the parties regarding the surname change and the inclusion of the applicant's particulars on the birth certificate. The court held that the best interests of the child standard required recognition of both parents and that a double-barrelled surname would not prejudice the child but rather affirm his identity and rights. The court rejected the respondent's jurisdictional argument, finding that in the absence of the mother's consent, the court could dispense with such consent and order the Director General to...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The court ordered the first respondent to cooperate in the completion of forms for the alteration of the minor child's surname and the inclusion of the applicant's particulars on the unabridged birth certificate. The Director General was authorized and directed to effect the changes. No order as...
Orders
- The first respondent is directed to sign and fill in all relevant details in the prescribed forms for the insertion of the applicant's particulars in the child's birth registration and for the alteration of the child's surname.
- The Director General: Home Affairs is authorized and directed to insert the applicant's particulars into the Birth Register and to amend the minor child's surname to 'Harvey-Lurie' in the Population Register.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment