L v H and Another (2205/2016)
L v H and Another (2205/2016) [2018] ZAKZDHC 61 (28 November 2018)
The court found that the applicant, as co-holder of full parental rights and responsibilities, had made out a case for the relief sought. The evidence showed prior agreement between the parties regarding the surname change and the inclusion of the applicant's particulars on the birth certificate. The court held that the best interests of the child standard required recognition of both parents and that a double-barrelled surname would not prejudice the child but rather affirm his identity and rights. The court rejected the respondent's jurisdictional argument, finding that in the absence of th…
Source excerpt
- Change Of Surname
- Parental Responsibilities And Rights
- Best Interests Of Child
- Births And Deaths Registration Act
- Unabridged Birth Certificate