L.A.M. and Another v E.M. and Another (Leave to Appeal) (2025/066517) [2025] ZAGPJHC 684 (7 July 2025)
The court found that the order regarding the matrimonial home was interim and not appealable, as it did not have final effect nor did the respondents demonstrate exceptional circumstances. The orders concerning the trust were based on uncontested facts, including the removal of the fifth respondent as trustee and the second applicant's locus standi as sole trustee. The respondents' interpretation of the notice of motion was rejected as opportunistic and unsupported by the affidavits. The costs order was upheld, as the first respondent's conduct justified the award despite the applicants' limited success. The court concluded that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal nor...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPJHC 684
- Parties
- Applicant: L[...] A[...] M[...]; Applicant: L[...] A[...] M[...] NO; Respondent: E[...] M[...]; Respondent: E[...] M[...] NO
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 July 2025
- Case Number
- 2025/066517
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Main Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including counsel's fees on scale B.
- Judges
- Liebenberg
- Legal Topics
- Interim Relief, Appealability of Orders, Trust Management, Costs Award, Matrimonial Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L[...] A[...] M[...]
Applicant
L[...] A[...] M[...] NO
Applicant
E[...] M[...]
Respondent
E[...] M[...] NO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Main Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interim order regarding the matrimonial home is appealable.
- 2 Whether the orders relating to the trust and its assets are susceptible to appeal.
- 3 Whether the costs order granted against the first respondent is open to appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the order regarding the matrimonial home was interim and not appealable, as it did not have final effect nor did the respondents demonstrate exceptional circumstances. The orders concerning the trust were based on uncontested facts, including the removal of the fifth respondent as trustee and the second applicant's locus standi as sole trustee. The respondents' interpretation of the notice of motion was rejected as opportunistic and unsupported by the affidavits. The costs order was upheld, as the first respondent's conduct justified the award despite the applicants' limited success. The court concluded that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal nor...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including counsel's fees on scale B.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs, including counsel's fees on scale B.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment