Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Elvis and Another v Registrar of Deeds Pretoria and Others (49/2011B) [2025] ZALCC 31 (28 July 2025)
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the underlying order was interim, not finally determinative, and the dispute had become moot after 30 days.
L.A.M. and Another v E.M. and Another (Leave to Appeal) (2025/066517) [2025] ZAGPJHC 684 (7 July 2025)
Leave to appeal was dismissed with costs. The court found no appeal lay against an interim matrimonial-home order, the trust orders were unassailable, and the costs order was justified.
South African Tourism Board v Letsema Consulting and Advisory (Pty) Ltd and Others (64334/2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 395 (22 April 2025)
The High Court granted Letsema leave to appeal against a legality-review remedy, finding arguable issues about profits, reasonable expenses, appealability, and costs.
Dell v Demajistre and Others (Reasons) (A187/2024) [2025] ZAGPPHC 206 (12 March 2025)
The High Court held that an order striking a matter from the roll is not final and therefore not appealable. The appeal was not entertained and the matter was removed from the roll.
LI Feng Textiles and Others v Bank of Taiwan Incorporated in Republic Of China (t/a as Bank of Taiwan South Africa Branch) and Another (A068332/2024) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1301 (24 December 2024)
The High Court held that the appeal was not competent because the order was not final or appealable, and dismissed the appeal with costs.
Kotze v Oosthuizen and Another (Appeal) (CIV APP FB11/2024) [2024] ZANWHC 285 (13 November 2024)
The court found that the order granted by the court a quo did not amount to a final eviction order. The appellant retained the right to occupy the residential portion of the farm pending the outcome of eviction proceedings, which had not yet been instituted. The order merely confirmed the respondents' rights as owners to access and use the property, excluding the residential area. The court held that PIE was not applicable at this stage, as no eviction proceedings were underway. The appeal was dismissed on the basis that the order was not final and did not affect the appellant's rights to occ…
Source excerpt
Scania Finance Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd v Mathafeng Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (Leave to Appeal) (65023/2020) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1162 (12 November 2024)
The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal against a provisional winding-up order, finding no reasonable prospects of success.
Mdluli v National Housing Finance Corporation (Application for Leave to Appeal) (J841/2024) [2024] ZALCJHB 385 (3 October 2024)
The Labour Court dismissed leave to appeal after striking an urgent application off the roll, holding the order was not appealable because it was not final.
Lynx Investment (Pty) Ltd and Another v Picnoord Kitchen (Pty) Ltd and Another (Application for Leave to Appeal) (2024/052019) [2024] ZAGPJHC 928 (18 September 2024)
The court found that the interim mandatory interdict reinstating the respondent was not appealable as it did not finally determine the rights of the parties nor dispose of substantial relief. The order was procedural, aimed at preserving or restoring the status quo pending the final determination of the parties' rights. The applicants' conduct in executing the judgment before the expiry of the period for noting an appeal deprived the respondents of the protection afforded by the suspension rule and amounted to interference with the administration of justice. The interests of justice did not d…
Source excerpt
Dinah N.O and Another v Iginla and Others (063768/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 914 (10 September 2024)
The High Court dismissed leave to appeal against confirmation of an interim interdict, holding the order was not final and the property had not yet transferred.
Explore more
